Forty Five Years of Anticoagulant Rodenticides — Past, Present and Future Trends

Forty Five Years of Anticoagulant Rodenticides — Past, Present and Future Trends

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Proceedings of the Fifteenth Vertebrate Pest Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings Conference 1992 collection March 1992 FORTY FIVE YEARS OF ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES — PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS Malcolm R. Hadler Sorex Limited Alan P. Buckle Research & Development Manager, ICI Public Health Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc15 Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Hadler, Malcolm R. and Buckle, Alan P., "FORTY FIVE YEARS OF ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES — PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS" (1992). Proceedings of the Fifteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 1992. 36. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc15/36 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings collection at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Fifteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 1992 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FORTY FIVE YEARS OF ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES — PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS MALCOLM R. HADLER, Managing Director, Sorex Limited, Widnes, Cheshire, WA8 8TJ, UK ALAN P. BUCKLE, Research & Development Manager, ICI Public Health, Fernhurst, Haslcmere, Surrey, GU27 3JE, UK ABSTRACT: The anticoagulant rodenticides were discovered in the 1940s and their advantages of efficacy and safety quickly resulted in their use dominating the practice of rodent control in temperate countries. However, the development of resistance to the early compounds within a decade stimulated research culminating in the invention of anew class of anticoagu- lant, the second generation compounds, active against resistant strains but also overall far more potent than those previously available. A novel baiting strategy, pulsed baiting, was developed to make full use of this valuable characteristic. Pulsed baiting has enabled the use of second generation anticoagulants in situations where early products were of limited value, particularly in tropical agriculture. The future of this highly-successful group of compounds is reviewed in relation to resistance and the difficulty and cost of developing further rodenticides. Proc. 15th Vertebrate Pest Conf. (J. E. Borrecco & R. E. Marsh, Editors) Published at University of Calif., Davis. 1992 INTRODUCTION this should be it is necessary to understand the mode of action Few modern pesticide groups have such long a history of of anticoagulants. successful use as the anticoagulant rodenticides. Their origin When the carcass of an anticoagulated rodent is analysed, lies in the discovery that dicoumarin was the active agent by far the largest residue of anticoagulant is found in the liver, responsible for a haemorrhagic condition found in the USA the site of action. Within the liver, Vitamin K is utilised to in cattle that had been fed spoiled sweet clover hay (Link drive the production of blood clotting factors II, VII, IX & X 1944). by the gamma-carboxylation of glutamic acid residues of pre- Early interest in anticoagulants was concentrated upon cursor proteins. Concomitant with this reaction, the active their therapeutic use for the treatment of thrombosis. Workers form of vitamin K, a hydroquinone (KHj), is converted to an at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation were respon- inactive 2,3-epoxide. Some of this is excreted but the major- sible for the isolation of dicoumarin and for the synthesis of a ity is reactivated by an epoxide reductase enzyme. The reacti- number of analogues in an attempt to increase the potency vated vitamin recycles and represents the major source of of the parent compound. The 42nd member of this series, vitamin K in the clotting factor synthesis cycle. Small losses subsequently called warfarin, proved to be the most active. are replaced from extraneous sources, gut bacteria and from food (Fig. 1). The rodenticidal potential of these compounds seems to have been recognised independently in the USA and in the UK. According to Mills (1955), Link noted that warfarin "might make a good exterminating agent" following the ob- servation that laboratory rodents died of haemorrhage. In the UK, workers researching dicoumarin had made a similar ob- servation. When contacted by a pest controller who was un- able to obtain rodenticides due to post-war shortages, they handed over a sample for trial. The first controlled trials be- ing carried out in London in 1946-47. The unpublished reports of these trials and O'Connor (1948) indicate that the significant advantages of anticoagu- lants over previously available rodenticides were recognised remarkably quickly. In an eighteen-month period, the foun- dations were laid upon which all subsequent developments took place. Dicoumarin was introduced as a commercial rodenticidc in the UK in 1949 and warfarin was registered for sale in the USA in 1950. Because of its greater potency, warfarin superseded dicoumarin and very rapidly became the domi- nant rodenticide, a position it was to retain on a world scale for many years. THE MODE OF ACTION OF ANTICOAGULANTS The anticoagulants represented a significant advance be- cause they overcame nearly all of the negative aspects of their Figure 1. The relationship between the metabolism and the physiological action of Vitamin K . (After Park 1982). predecessors, the acute poisons. In order to understand why 1 149 All available anticoagulants seem to share the same site toms is such that the rodent does not recognise their relation- of action; they block the epoxide reductase enzyme ship. In addition, the effect itself is relatively painless in most (Silverman 1980). The recycling of activated vitamin K is cases. Bait shyness does not occur, prebaiting is unnecessary, therefore stopped and there is insufficient incoming vitamin and compared to most other toxicants, anticoagulants may be K to maintain the carboxylation reaction. The production of considered relatively humane (Rowsell et al. 1979). clotting factors is critically reduced and eventually, when the Furthermore, a practical treatment was available in the supply of factors already present has degraded, the clotting event of accidental ingestion and, because of their potency, mechanism fails and haemorrhaging begins. even the earliest could be used at concentrations more appro- Because the mechanism is common to them all, there is priately measured in parts per million (ppm), and therefore no significant difference in the time to death between antico- palatability was inherently far less of a problem than it had agulants once the enzyme is blocked. What can differ is the been with the fast-acting products. time taken to achieve this. Also, once more because of their common mode of action, the anticoagulants do not differ in THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTICOAGULANTS the sites at which the lethal haemorrhages occur. Commercial anticoagulant rodenticides are either indane- The treatment of poisoning in the case of an accident is diones or hydroxycoumarins, with the exception of one also common to all compounds. The synthesis of clotting thiocoumarin. Following the introduction of warfarin, a num- factors can be restarted by the addition of appropriate amounts ber of compounds were developed during the nineteen fifties of Vitamin K4. Frequent administration is necessary until the and these are now collectively known as the "first generation anticoagulant has cleared. Different anticoagulants require anticoagulants." Principal amongst these were the different treatment periods dependent upon their half-lives at hydroxycoumarins, coumachlor (1951), coumafuryl (1953) the site of action, varying from some hours for warfarin to and coumatetralyl (1956). Amongst the indane-diones were several weeks for the more potent products (Anon. 1988, diphacinone (1952) and chlorophacinone (1961). Pindone MacKintoshetal. 1988). was first developed as an insecticide and its rodenticidal properties were not utilised until 1953. A common feature of THE ADVANTAGES OF ANTICOAGULANTS the first generation compounds is that they are chronic toxi- With an understanding of the mode of action of antico- cants: they are more potent if administered in small daily agulants, it is worth reviewing the advantages that were so doses than if given as a single dose. For example the acute quickly recognised by the early workers. These were, and still oral LD50 in rats of warfarin is variously quoted at between are, the reasons why the anticoagulant group of rodenticides 10-20 mg/kg (Lund 1982) and 323 mg/kg (Hagan and came to dominate the practice of rodent control. Radom-ski 1953). The sub-acute oral LD50 by contrast is Prior to the introduction of anticoagulants, the only com- generally accepted to be about 5 daily doses of 1 mg/kg for pounds available were fast-acting single-dose toxicants, such warfarin and for most of the first generation products. The as thallium sulphate, red squill, arsenic, zinc phosphide, and reason for this apparent anomaly appears to relate to their the first purpose-built rodenticide, ANTU. half-lives. Yacobi and Wingard (1972) determined the bio- Each suffered one common fault, they produced symp- logical half-life of warfarin in Sprague-Dawley rats as being toms very rapidly. Rodent behaviour is such that an indi- between 5 and 28 hours. Warfarin is relatively easily detoxi- vidual encountering a new food for the first time will normally fied by the action of mixed-function oxidase enzymes and converted

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us