Congruence Between Learning Styles of Cree, Dene and Metis Students, and Instructional Styles of Native and Non-Native Teachers

Congruence Between Learning Styles of Cree, Dene and Metis Students, and Instructional Styles of Native and Non-Native Teachers

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 289 667 RC 016 534 AUTHOR Tamaoka, Katsuo TITLE Congruence between Learning Styles of Cree, Dene and Metis Students, and Instructional Styles of Native and Non-Native Teachers. PUB DATE Oct 86 NOTE 26p.; Paper presented at the Mokakit Conference of the Indian Education Research Association (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, October 17-19, 1986). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) Speeches /Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian Education; American Indians; *Canada Natives; *Cognitive Style; Comparative Analysis; Foreign Countries; Secondary Education; Statistical Data; *Student Attitudes; Student Characteristics; *Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Characteristics; *Teaching Styles; Tribes IDENTIFIERS Canada; Canfield Learning Styles Inventory; Cree (Tribe); Dene (Nation); Metis (People); *Saskatchewan ABSTRACT To ascertain possible differences and similarities in learning styles of Cree, Dene (Chipewyan), and Metis students and the instructional styles of Native and non-Native teachers in northern Saskatchewan, Canfield's Instructional Styles Inventory was administered to 280 grade 7-9 students (81 Cree, 65 Dene, and 134 Metis) and 79 teachers (15 Native and 64 non-Native). Results showed significant differences on four scales of learning style, indicating Dene students were less negative towards a competitive learning situation; were least negative to learning through written material; and had less preference for learning by direct experience than Cree or Metis students. Findings also indicated non-Native teachers more strongly preferred to teach from logically and clearly organized materials than did Native teachers and Native teachers were more likely to encourage students to work independently. Although both Native and non-Native teache::s were congruent on more than 65% of a.1 instructional/learning components with all student groups, it was found that Native teachers were congruent with all student groups at a higher percentage and on a greater number of components than was true for non-Native teachers. (NEC) *********************************************.-************************* * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original documit. * ********************************************* :************************ try K`c CONGRUENCE BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES OF CREE, DENE AND METIS STUDENTS, AND INSTRUCTIONAL STYLES OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE TEACHERS The Presentation Paper at the Mokakit Indian Education Research Association Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada October 17-19, 1986 "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIA HAS BEEN GRANTED BY 500 0,ryC),CKO.... TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) BY KATSUO TAMAOKA INDIAN AND OORTEERN EDUCATION PROGRAM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION U S DEPARTMENT OF EOUCATION e of Educational Research and Improvement UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN EDU 'ONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CANADA CENTER (ERIC) his document hosbeen reproduced receioed from the person as Originating it or organitation Minor changes have ,eWcluchondualdybeen made to improve Points of view or op.nons staled this doCu 'vent do not necessarilyrepresent official OFRI position or polr:y 2 1 INTRODUCTION unlike the detailed attention given to Native teacher education and Native curriculum development in Saskatchewan since 1973, Improvements in teaching methods for Native students have been given only minor consideration by governments ar.1 Native organizations. Therefore, beyond the concerns about 'who is teaching' and 'what is being taught', the question remains: how !s teaching to be done in order to maximize learning? Efforts to improve education for Native peoples in Saskatchewan have been undertaken since 1973 In the area of Native teacher education programs. In 1973, the Indian Teacher Education Program (ITEP) was implemented Jointly by the Saskatchewan Indian Cultural College and the University of Saskatchewan. This was the first teacher education program in Saskatchewan to "provide Native people with the opportunity to become proficient teachers" (Indian Teacher Education Program, 1985, p.1). According to the record of ITEP graduates, compiled in November, 1985 by the ITEP office, 90 of 132 graduates, or 68.2 percent,were listed as having been hired as teachers. In addition, among ITEP graduates, there were three principals, one vice-principal and nine educational co-ordinators and counsellors. In 1976, the Northern Teacher Education Program (NORfEP)was established in Lac La Ronge, Saskatchewan, asa teacher education program for Native students. An agreement Letween the Northern Lights School Division #11.?, (NLSD) and the province of Saskatchewan provided for delivery of NORTEP in conjunction with the University of 3 2 Saskatchewan and the University of Regina. Prior to the beginning of NORTEP In 1976, 98 percent of teachers in Northern Saskatchewan schools were English-speaking Canadians from other areas (Cook & More 1979). As of September 10, 1985, 36 Native teachers were employed by NLSD,or 14.06 percent of the total of 256 teachers. Among the 36 Native teachers working for NLSD, 78 percent were NORTEP graduatesas reported by the Director of NORTEP (Cook, April 13, 1986). The Saskatchewan Urban Native Teacher Education Program (SUNTEP) was established in 1980 to provide training for urban Native students. Programs were set up In Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert under the direction of the Gabriel Dumont Institute of Native Studies and Applied Research, in co-operation with the University of Regina and the University of Saskatchewan (BIrnie & Ryan 1983, Bouvier 1984). By 1985, SUNTEP had produced 20 graduates with Bachelor of Education degreesor Standard "A" teaching certificates.Nineteen of those were employed in educational institutions -ith one-half of them teaching in the provincial school system (Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, 1985). In part, these programs have been premised on the reasoningthat it is Native peoples who have the most intimate understanding cf Native traditions, customs and languages. As such, it is they who will be "best able to create the learning environment suited to the habits and interests of the Indian child" (National InJian Brotherhood, 1972, p.18). Furthermore, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission in the report entitled Elaallan EQuity (September, 1985), concluded that "persons of Indian ancestry are not receiving equal benefits from the education system of Saskatchewan" (p.79). The report recommendeo 4 3 filling teaching positions with qualified teachers of Indianancestry in numbers equal to the proportion of students of Indian ancestry enrolled in schools of Saskatchewan. Since 1982, Native curriculum development in Saskatchewan has also received considerable attention. It has been said by members of the Native community and other critics of the education system, that through school curricula, Native peoples are "often cast in an unfavorable light' (National Indian Brotherhood, 1972, p.9). If sensitized to Native perspectives, school curricula should include positive, accurate and up-.o-date programs for both Native and non-Native students. On September 27, 1982, the Native Curriculum Review Committeewas established in Saskatchewan "to recommend co the Department of Education principles for curriculum development as they apply to Native students" (Minister's Advisory Comnittee on Native Curriculum Review, 1984,p.49). In March 1984, this Committee released a report titled A FiveYear Action Plan for NativeCurriculumDevelopment. In this report, twelve recommend?fions were made regarding the development of Native curricula. After the recommendations were accepted by the Minister,a new committee called the Indian and Metis Curriculum Advisory Committeewas formed to incorporate Indian and Metis content into the provincialcore curriculum which was being designed in the 1980s. Among initiatives taken to improve Native curricula, teaching and learning materials have been designed for the Grade VIII Social Studies program, entitled APUltawkosan;_the Story of thelletis Nation In Western Canada (Dorion & Dorion, 1982). These materials include both a student activity book and a teacher's guide and resource book. A similar 5 4 package of teaching and learning materials is thetextbook titled The Riel Rebellion: Biographical Approach (Hou &Hou, 1984). These teaching and learning materials ha, e been designed to beused as a part of "locally determined courses" of the Middle Level(grades six to nine) which was proposed by the Core Curriculum AdvisoryCommittee In the report, program Policy Proposals released In January,1986. Although teacher training and curriculum Innovationshave been undertaken In an effort to improve Native education,few developments have been initiated in the area of improving teachingmethods. Research has indicated that Native children process information ina manner different from that of non-Native children(e.g., Goodenough, 1926; Telford, 1932; Berry 1966 & 1971; Steward, 1971; Bland, 1975;Koenig, 1981; Kaulback, 1984). In addition, the Native Curriculum Review Committee also stated as one of the principlesand guidelines for Native curriculum development: There shall be a recognition that children exhibit different learning styles but that these learning styles cut across cultural and socio-economic groups (Minister's Advisory Committee on Native Curriculum Review, 1984, p.3). The present study was conducted to provideinformation concerning possible differences

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us