Kinetics and Regulation of the NAD(P)H-Dependent Glyoxylate-Specific Reductase from Spinach Leaves Leszek A

Kinetics and Regulation of the NAD(P)H-Dependent Glyoxylate-Specific Reductase from Spinach Leaves Leszek A

Kinetics and Regulation of the NAD(P)H-Dependent Glyoxylate-Specific Reductase from Spinach Leaves Leszek A. Kleczkowski Plant Physiology Department, University of Urnea, 901-87 Urnea, Sweden Z. Naturforsch. 50c, 21-28 (1995); received October 21/November 21, 1994 Alternative Substrate, Cyanide, Cytosol, Glycolate Pathway, Glyoxylate Reductase Kinetic mechanism of purified spinach leaf NAD(P)H glyoxylate reductase (GR-1) was studied using either NADPH and NADH as alternative substrates with glyoxylate. The mech­ anism was elucidated from substrate kinetic patterns using NADH as a cofactor rather than NADPH. With NADPH varied versus glyoxylate, and with NADPH and glyoxylate varied at a constant ratio, the patterns obtained on double reciprocal plots appeared to be consistent with a ping-pong mechanism; however, kinetic patterns with NADH conclusively ruled out the ping-pong reaction in favour of the sequential addition of the reactants. Product inhi­ bition studies with glycolate and NADP have suggested either that NADPH binds to the enzyme before glyoxylate or that the addition of substrates is a random one. Studies with active group modifiers suggested an involvement of histidine, serine and cysteine residues in GR-1 activity. Salts had little or no effect on the activity of the enzyme, with the exception of cyanide, which had an apparent K, of ca. 2 m M . Studies with several metabolites used as possible effectors of GR-1 activity have suggested that the enzyme is modulated only by substrate availability in vivo. The apparent insensitivity of GR-1 to metabolic effectors is consistent with the proposed role of the enzyme in detoxifying glyoxylate which may act as a potent inhibitor of photosynthetic processes in plant tissues. Introduction synthesis (Tolbert et al., 1970; Husic et al., 1987; Givan et al., 1988). In leaves of higher plants there are at least three GR-1 is the primary form of a glyoxylate-reduc- reductases which can utilize glyoxylate as a ing activity in leaf extracts of many plants, and is substrate. The cytosolic NADPH-preferring gly­ characterized by its low K m (glyoxylate) of less oxylate reductase (GR-1) is specific for glyoxy­ than 0.1 m M (Kleczkowski et al., 1986, 1988, 1990). late, whereas two other reductases (peroxisomal The GR-1 enzyme appears similar in many re­ HPR-1 and cytosolic HPR-2) utilize glyoxylate spects to a spinach glyoxylate reductase, partially less efficiently than hydroxypyruvate as a physio­ purified over 30 years ago and described as being logical substrate (Kleczkowski et al., 1986, 1990; specific for NADPH as a cofactor (Zelitch and Givan and Kleczkowski, 1992). The reductases are Gotto, 1962). In our previous study (Kleczkowski believed to be closely involved in the glycolate et al., 1986), using several affinity chromatography pathway (oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle), columns, we have failed to detect any NADPH- which results in photorespiration. The pathway, specific glyoxylate reductase in spinach. The which starts with phosphoglycolate formation by GR-1 is also similar to a reductase in Chlamy- ribulose-l,5-bisphosphate oxygenase, involves sev­ domonas reinhardtii, which preferentially uses eral cell compartments and is the main route for NADPH as a cofactor and does not react with metabolism of two-carbon and some three-carbon hydroxypyruvate (Husic and Tolbert, 1987). compounds and for nitrogen cycling during photo- Nothing is known about the kinetic mechanism of the GR-1 reaction. This is in contrast to several reports on kinetics and regulation of HPR-1, Abbreviations:: GR-1, NAD(P)H-dependent glyoxylate- which can react non-specifically with glyoxylate, specific reductase; HPR-1, NADH-preferring hydroxy­ pyruvate reductase; HPR-2, NADPH-preferring hy­ and which has been shown to perform a sequential droxypyruvate reductase. mechanism (Kohn and Warren, 1970), consistent Reprint requests to Dr. L. A. Kleczkowski. with both substrates binding to the enzyme before Telefax: 46-90-166676. release of any product. Both GR-1 and HPR-1 are 0939-5075/95/0100-0021 $ 06.00 © 1995 Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. All rights reserved. 22 L. A. Kleczkowski • Kinetics and Regulation of Glyoxylate Reductase recognized by antibodies raised against purified Kinetic studies GR-1 (although with a different degree of speci­ The K m values for substrates of GR-1 were cal­ ficity), suggesting common epitopes for the two culated from replots of v ' 1 intercepts of the double proteins (Kleczkowski et al., 1986). Surprisingly, reciprocal plots obtained during substrate kinetics preliminary studies on GR-1, using NADPH and studies (Segel, 1975). For product inhibition stud­ glyoxylate as substrates, suggested a ping-pong ies, assays were carried out by varying either kinetic mechanism (see present paper), calling for NADPH or glyoxylate at a fixed level of a second a release of a product before both substrates are substrate at several fixed concentrations of either bound to the enzyme. This apparently funda­ NADP or glycolate. The K Vx and K is values were mental difference in kinetic mechanism of two determined as described by (Segel, 1975). closely related enzymes provided stimulus for a more detailed kinetic analysis of GR-1. In the Results and Discussion present paper, kinetic properties of spinach GR-1 are evaluated with respect to the kinetic mecha­ Substrate kinetics nism of the enzyme and to its possible metabolic Substrate kinetics of GR-1 were initially carried regulation in vivo. out by determination of the rate of NADPH oxi­ dation in the reaction mixtures containing varying Material and Methods concentrations of glyoxylate or NADPH, with the other substrate kept at several fixed concen­ Reagents trations. The data were represented as double re­ ciprocal plots. With either NADPH or glyoxylate Spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) leaf GR-1 was as a varied substrate, the lines drawn through ex­ purified as described in (Kleczkowski et al., 1986). perimental points appeared to be parallel (Fig. 1). The enzyme was homogeneous, as determined by In each case, replots of v "1 intercepts versus re- SDS-electrophoresis of purified GR-1, and by im- munoblots of the purified protein using anti-spin- ach-GR-1 IgG raised in a rabbit (Kleczkowski 1 i 1 et al., 1986). Cofactors were from P-L Bio­ A ' ' NADPH, mM — r w 0.01 - chemicals. ----- ' T ' 0.02 _ -----°-04 Enzyme assay Er™ Km = 0.06 mM — A 1.0 ml assay mixture contained 100 him 3-(N- morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (Mops) (pH 7.1) 1 1 i I I l and appropriate concentrations of NADPH (or 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 /Glyoxylate (mM)_1 NADH) and glyoxylate, as indicated in legends to Figures and Tables. Reactions were initiated by the addition of glyoxylate, and the oxidation of NAD(P)H was monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm (25°C). Control assays containing all the components of the reaction but glyoxylate were performed to correct for non-specific oxidation of NAD(P)H. For assays of NADH-dependent ac­ tivity of GR-1, the enzyme was desalted on a small Sephadex G-25 column to remove NADPH 1/NADPH (mM)'1 present after affinity purification of the enzyme (Kleczkowski et al., 1986). One unit of GR-1 ac­ Fig. 1. Substrate kinetics of spinach GR-1 with glyoxy­ tivity was defined as amount of the enzyme re­ late and NADPH. (A) glyoxylate varied (0.04 - 0.4 m M ) at indicated fixed concentrations of NADPH. (B) quired to oxidize one mole NAD(P)H per min NADPH varied (0.01 - 0.1 m M ) at indicated fixed con­ under assay conditions. centrations of glyoxylate. L. A. Kleczkowski ■ Kinetics and Regulation of Glyoxylate Reductase 23 ciprocal of either glyoxylate or NADPH concen­ both substrates a slight curvature of the plot tration were linear (data not shown). The K m appeared. values for glyoxylate and NADPH determined Substrate kinetics of GR-1 were also studied from these plots were 59 and 6 ^im, respectively. using NADH rather than NADPH as a cofactor. Varying NADPH and glyoxylate in a constant When either glyoxylate or NADH were varied at ratio versus activity of GR-1 (Fig. 2) resulted in a several fixed concentrations of the second sub­ straight line; however, at high concentration of strate, the lines of the double reciprocal plots con­ verged to the left of the ordinate axis (Fig. 3). This was in contrast to kinetics of GR-1 with NADPH and glyoxylate, where the plots were parallel (Fig. 1). Replots of v "1 intercepts and of slopes were linear for either of the substrates of GR-1 (data not shown). The K m values for glyoxylate and NADH were 1.1 and 0.3 m M , respectively. Product inhibition The double reciprocal plots were also used to represent the data obtained during product inhi­ (mM) '1 bition studies with glycolate and NADP (Figs. 4 and 5). NADP was a clear competitive inhibitor Fig. 2. Substrate kinetics of spinach GR-1 using a con­ stant ratio of substrates of the enzyme. Assay concen­ versus NADPH, while other product inhibition trations of glyoxylate and NADPH were kept at a 3:1 patterns appeared to be uncompetitive or mixed. ratio. The ranges of concentrations of glyoxylate and The competitive pattern has indicated that both NADPH were 0.01 - 0.2 mM and 0.0033 - 0.067 mM, re­ spectively. 1 /Glyoxylate (mM)'1 1/Glyoxylate (mM)"1 1/NADH (mM)'1 Fig. 4. Kinetics of glycolate inhibition of spinach GR-1. Fig. 3. Substrate kinetics of spinach GR-1 with glyoxy­ (A) NADPH varied (0.01 - 0.1 mM) at indicated fixed late and NADH. (A) glyoxylate varied (0.25 - 2.5 mM) concentrations of glycolate. Glyoxylate was fixed at at indicated fixed concentrations of NADH.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us