A Phylogeny of Japanese Dwarf Bamboos, the Sasa-Group Based on RAPD- and Morphological Data Analyses

A Phylogeny of Japanese Dwarf Bamboos, the Sasa-Group Based on RAPD- and Morphological Data Analyses

Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 52 :1-24, 2004 !The Society for the Study of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 2004 Mikio Kobayashi1 and Ryo Furumoto2 : A phylogeny of Japanese dwarf bamboos, the Sasa-group based on RAPD- and morphological data analyses 1Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya 321―8505, Japan; 2Oversea Cooperation Department, Forest Tree Breeding Center, 3809―1 Ishi, Juo 319―1301, Ibaraki, Japan Abstract A phylogenetic relationship of 30 Japanese bamboo taxa was analyzed including Phyllostachys bambusoides, Shibataea kumasasa, Sinobambusa tootsik, and the species of four most common genera of the Sasa-group ; Sasa, Sasamorpha, Pleioblastus and Pseudosasa based on 327 RAPD data by Wagner parsimony rooted at Strep- tochaeta spicata. Phyllostachys/Shibataea positioned as the earliest divergent clade, Pseudosasa was the next most basal, and Sasamorpha/Sasa sect. Lasioderma and Pleioblastus/Sasa excluding Lasioderma formed a sister clade at the terminals. Within genus Sasa clade, sect. Macrochlamys including Sasa jotanii was the most basal, Monilicladae was the next most basal, followed by the sister clades of sects. Sasa and Crassinodi at the termi- nals. Clusters of a UPGMA dendrogram coincided with the topology of the RAPD tree except for the position of Pseudosasa. Differencies between another RAPD tree with representative 20 species and a variety of the Sasa- group and a morphological tree with 14 species and a variety based on 35 characters both rooted at Phyl- lostachys bambusoides were discussed. Section Lasioderma was in the Sasamorpha clade in the RAPD trees, while the morphological tree showed it as a component of the genus Sasa. These results compelled us to exclude the section from the genus Sasa and to conserve the genus Neosasamorpha Tatew. Character states between culm-sheaths persistent and deciduous, branching pleioclade and monoclade, culm erect and ascending were dis- cussed on the former as the plesiomorphic and the latter as the apomorphic to consider the evolutionary trend among the Japanese bamboos and divergence of genus Sasa in accordance with the snowy environment. Key words : Japanese bamboos, Neosasamorpha, phylogeny, Sasa, Sasa-group. Introduction 1978)which is laid aside in the present study. Muroi(1937)was the first who divided the Among the Sasa-group, genera Sasa and Japanese bamboos into three main groups ; the Sasamorpha are representative floristic ele- “Take”, the “Sasa” and the “Bamboo”. These are ments that characterize the plant community in defined by the culm-sheath deciduous, culm- Japan. Genus Sasa is almost endemic to the Ja- sheath persistent and sympodial rhizome system pan Islands with 32 species, whereas the only without considering the culm height, respec- two species of Sasamorpha are distributed in the tively. Recently they have been most acceptably Pacific side of the Japan Islands and Korea revised by Suzuki(1996), who recognized 6 gen- (Suzuki 1996). Suzuki(1961)established the era in the Take-group, Phyllostachys, Hibano- ‘Crassinodi-line’ as a distribution limit which bambusa, Semiarundinaria, Sinobambusa, Tetragono- lies longitudinally parallel to the Pacific coast calamus and Shibataea ; 8 genera in the Sasa- line from north to south of the northeastern dis- group, Sasa, Neosasamorpha, Sasamorpha, Sasaella, trict of the Japan Islands(Fig. 1). The line is Pseudosasa, Indocalamus, Pleioblastus and Chi- based on an approximate 50 cm of mean annual monobambusa ; and two genera of Bambusa maximum snow depth and defines the geo- and Dendrocalamus in the Bamboo-group. The graphical distribution limits of Sasa sect. Crassi- Take-and Sasa-group are distributed naturally nodi on the Pacific side, while Sasa sects. Sasa in the temperate region, while the Bamboo- and Macrochlamys are distributed in the exceed- group was introduced from tropical Asia(Suzuki ingly snowy area on Japan Sea side. Monilicla- - 1 - 植物地理・分類研究 第 52 巻第 1 号 2004 年 7 月 Fig. 1. Map showing the distribution range of genus Sasa sect. Crassinodi(screened area),theCrassinodi-line (bold line), locations of sect. Lasioderma plants(open dots), and main locations of sampling site in the Japan Islands. dae of other section is distributed in a Pacific Tanimoto(1984)discovered the distribution of Ocean environment, whereas sect. Lasioderma a plant like Sasa kurilensis of sect. Macrochla- mostly within the distribution range of the sect. mys in Isls. Hachijojima and Mikurajima, Izu Is- Crassinodi(Fig. 1, Suzuki 1978). Key characters lands, even though these islands are located in of vegetative organs, habitat property and geo- the Pacific Ocean far south of the Izu Peninsula graphical distribution of these dwarf bamboos (Fig. 1). His discovery was so sensational from a are schematically summarized in Fig. 2. phytogeographical viewpoint that controversy - 2 - July 2004 J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. Vol. 52. No. 1 aroused over which taxon the plant should be fication of Japonica rice cultivars(Mackill 1995); ascribed to : Sasa kurilensis var. jotanii(Inoue good correlation with RAPD, rbcL sequences and and Tanimoto 1985), S . kurilensis var. kurilen- RFLPs data for phylogenetic analysis among lo- sis(Kobayashi 1985),orS . tsuboiana(Suzuki cal populations of Larix(Shiraishi et al. 1996) ; 1996). Recently, Kobayashi(2000)treated it as among three species of Helianthus as deter- a new species, S . jotanii, after an intensive mined by Southern hybridization or correlation study on its flower morphology. with restriction sites of endonucleases, and/or Nakai described Sasa sect. Lasioderma(Nakai homologous genetic loci(Rieseberg 1996) ;and 1931)and sect. Acrocladula(Nakai 1934).Tate- high consistency index between most parsimoni- waki(1940)recognized these groups as having ous trees based on RAPD-dataset and supranu- putative hybrid origin between Sasa and clear dataset of morphological, pollen epidermis Sasamorpha and revised them into a new genus texture, chromosomal and chemical variation Neosasamorpha. Koidzumi described two new among sections of genus Allium(van Raamsdonk sections of genus Sasa, i.e., Pseudosasamorpha et al. 1997). Thus, applications for various sub- (Koidzumi 1939)and Nanopseudosasamorpha ordinate taxa from cultivars through congeneric (Koidzumi 1942), and decided that, contrary to species or sections show that RAPD data are ef- Tatewaki’s treatment, the two intercalary sec- fective in analyzing their phylogenetic relation- tions form continuous intermediaries between ships. Sasa and Sasamorpha. Suzuki(1978)initially The Japanese dwarf bamboos have a uniform- treated those four sections as one, Sasa sect. La- ity in genomic size among related genera such sioderma Nakai sensu lato. However, Suzuki that all are tetraploid with 2n=48(Tateoka (1996)later adopted Tatewaki’s Neosasamorpha 1955). These taxa have self-compatibility and while excluding the possibility of hybridity. few crossing barriers to forming hybrids even be- Using allozyme evidence on hybridization in tween distantly related genera(Muramatsu the genus Sasa and its related genera, Taka- 1981)suggesting an underlying homology in hashi et al.(1994)decided that these confusing chromosomal morphology. These findings sug- taxonomic treatments were mainly due to inter- gest that Japanese bamboos are close enough for sectional and intergeneric hybridization not only effective RAPD analysis, considering segregation on the F1 hybrid level but also at the underlying of a single RAPD marker links well with the genetic recombination level, in which phyloge- configuration of chromosome-specific DNA frag- netic analysis was laid aside. Thus, distribution ments(Williams et al. 1990). Therefore, we con- patterns and putative hybridity of various Sasa- sidered that RAPD analysis will be sensitive group require explicit analytical methods to re- enough to resolve the phylogenetic relationships solve the phylogenetic relationships of each sec- among Japanese dwarf bamboos. tion and position. As mentioned above, phylogenetic positions of In 1990, Williams et al. developed a method of Sasa jotanii and Sasa sect. Lasioderma Nakai RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) sensu lato are ones of the most interesting ques- analysis examining the relation between RAPD tions concerning the Japanese dwarf bamboos. data with RFLPs. Before that, Nei and Li(1979) In the present study, we at first, tried to analyze proposed the transformation of shared restriction a phylogenetic relationship within the dwarf -site data of mitochondorial DNA fragments into bamboos based on the morphological characters genetic distance for RFLPs analysis. Many stud- by Wagner parsimony method because no cladis- ies suggest that RAPD banding patterns are tic analysis using the morphological characters good predictors of homology among various sub- of Japanese bamboos has been reported yet since ordinate taxa as follows. Dos Santos et al.(1994) the description of the genus Sasa by Makino and compared the modes of genetic similarity among Shibata(1901). Next, a UPGMA analysis with 45 Brassica oleracea genotypes between RAPD RAPD data was carried out to clarify principal and RFLPs methods and found that there is clusters among Japanese bamboo taxa. Third, high relationship between them ; effective classi- phylogenetic relationship was investigated by - 3 - 植物地理・分類研究 第 52 巻第 1 号 2004 年 7 月 Fig. 2. Index of vegetative organs to Japanese dwarf, culm-sheath persistent bamboos, the Sasa-group - 4 - July 2004 J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. Vol. 52. No.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    24 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us