I-40 Douglas Boulevard Interchange Reconstruction and Related Widening Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Submitted Previously for FASTLANE? YES Project on NHFN? Yes/no YES Name in Previous Application Same Project Name Project on NHS? Yes/no YES Previously Incurred Project Cost: $4,909,700 Project to add Interstate capacity? Yes/no YES Future Eligible Project Cost: $122,220,000 Project in national scenic area? Yes/no NO Total Project Cost: $127,129,700 Rail grade crossing or separation included? NO FASTLANE Request: $73,332,000 Intermodal or freight rail project, or freight project Total Federal Funds (incl. FASTLANE) $97,776,000 within freight rail, water, or intermodal facility? NO Matching funds restricted to If yes, specify: specific project component? NO NSFHP $ to be spent on above two items: N/A I-40 Douglas FASTLANE Application submitted by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2017 Supporting information can be found at: https://www.ok.gov/odot/Progress_and_Performance/Federal_Grant_Awards/FASTLANE_Grants.html ODOT Contact: Matthew Swift, SAPM Division Engineer, ODOT. (405) 521-2704 email: [email protected] State Oklahoma Inclusion in Planning Documents: Begin Lat/Long: 35˚26'0"N, 97˚22'30"W TIP: NO* End Lat/Long: 35˚24'8 "N, 97˚17'17"W STIP: NO* Size of project: Large MPO LRTP: YES Urbanized Area (UA): Oklahoma City State LRTP: YES UA population, 2014 919,230 State Freight Plan: NA * Elements of this project are included in the current STIP and TIP documents i I-40 Douglas FASTLANE Application submitted by Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2017 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Project Description ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Project Request [UPDATED] .............................................................................................................. 2 1.2. Project Elements Supported by FASTLANE Funds ............................................................................ 2 1.3. Project is Regionally and Nationally Significant ................................................................................ 3 1.4. Transportation Concerns and Existing Conditions ............................................................................ 3 2. Project Location ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Connections to Existing Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 4 3. Project Parties .................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1. Project Sponsor ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Key Supporting Stakeholders ............................................................................................................ 7 4. Sources/Uses of Project Funds [UPDATED] ....................................................................................... 8 5. Cost Effectiveness [UPDATED] .......................................................................................................... 9 5.1. BCA Assumptions .............................................................................................................................. 9 5.2. Results ............................................................................................................................................... 9 5.3. Non-Quantified Costs and Benefits ................................................................................................ 10 6. Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 10 6.1. Mobility Outcomes ......................................................................................................................... 10 6.2. Economic Outcomes ....................................................................................................................... 12 6.3. Safety Outcomes ............................................................................................................................. 14 6.4. Community and Environmental Outcomes .................................................................................... 16 6.5. Innovation and Partnership ............................................................................................................ 19 6.6. Cost Share ....................................................................................................................................... 19 7. Project Readiness ........................................................................................................................... 19 7.1. Technical Feasibility ........................................................................................................................ 19 7.2. Approvals and Coordination ........................................................................................................... 21 7.3. Risks and Mitigation Strategies ....................................................................................................... 22 8. Large Project Requirements [NEW] ................................................................................................ 23 List of Tables Table 1: Population Growth [NEW since FY16 FASTLANE application] ............................................................. 6 Table 2: Employment Growth [NEW since FY16 FASTLANE application] .......................................................... 6 Table 3: Sources and uses of total project costs [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] ....................... 8 Table 4: Benefit Cost Analysis Summary ($2015) [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] ................... 10 Table 5: Oklahoma Forecasted Freight Tonnage Flow, 2015-2040 ................................................................. 12 Table 6: Crash History, 2006-2016 [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] ......................................... 15 Table 7: Earthquake Inspection Policy, ODOT 2016 [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] .............. 22 iii List of Figures Figure 1: I-40 Douglas Project Location ............................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2: Project along Major Trucking Routes .................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3: Shipping US Marine Corps F153 engines by truck from Tinker AFB after retrofit ............................. 5 Figure 4: Westbound morning traffic on I-40 .................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Project Funding Sources [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] s ......................................... 8 Figure 6: Interstate Highways .......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 7: Eastern Oklahoma County Turnpike Extension ................................................................................ 11 Figure 8: Members of the 565th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron install engine ............................................ 13 Figure 9: Tinker Air Force Base KC-46 Aircraft Center ..................................................................................... 14 Figure 10: Oklahoma Governor Fallin at the opening of Boeing's new facility ............................................... 14 Figure 11: Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes ............................................................................................. 15 Figure 12: Douglas Boulevard Bridge - Deck repairs needed ........................................................................... 16 Figure 13: Anderson Road Bridge -Beam repairs needed ................................................................................ 16 Figure 14: Substandard Truck Clearance under Anderson Road ..................................................................... 17 Figure 15:Proposed Douglas Interchange Redesign Alternatives [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] .. 18 Figure 16: Crews hang beam for I-235 ............................................................................................................ 19 Figure 17: Project Schedule [UPDATED since FY16 FASTLANE application] .................................................... 20 Supporting Materials Supporting documentation can be found at the project website Oklahoma I-40 DOT FASTLANE, and include: • Reports and Technical Information (including the BCA Technical Memo) • Certifications and Assurances • Maps and Graphics • Letters of Support iv 200 N.E. 21st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105-3204 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION www.odot.org MEMORANDUM: TO: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy FROM: Matthew Swift, P.E., Strategic Asset and Performance Management Division Engineer DATE: December 14, 2016 RE: I-40 Douglas Boulevard Interchange Reconstruction and Related Widening, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma The Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) submitted the subject