Changes in the Nomenclature and Composition of the Arkansas Fish Fauna from 1988 to 1993 Henry W

Changes in the Nomenclature and Composition of the Arkansas Fish Fauna from 1988 to 1993 Henry W

Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 47 Article 40 1993 Changes in the Nomenclature and Composition of the Arkansas Fish Fauna from 1988 to 1993 Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University Thomas M. Buchanan University of Arkansas at Fort Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W. and Buchanan, Thomas M. (1993) "Changes in the Nomenclature and Composition of the Arkansas Fish Fauna from 1988 to 1993," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 47 , Article 40. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol47/iss1/40 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. * Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 47 [1993], Art. 40 Changes inthe Nomenclature and Composition of the Arkansas Fish Fauna from 1988 to 1993 Henry W. Robison Thomas M.Buchanan Department of Biological Sciences Department of Biology Southern Arkansas University Westark Community College Magnolia, AR71753 Fort Smith, AR72901 Anumber of changes in the nomenclature and compo- Species Additions sition of the Arkansas ichthyofauna have occurred since the appearance of Robison and Buchanan's (1988) trea- Cyprinidae -Carps and Minnows tise on the fishes of Arkansas. We listed 215 species of 1. Luxilus cardinalis (Mayden). Cardinal shiner. fishes inhabiting state waters including 197 native species, Formerly, Notropis sp. undescribed. Robison and two of which were undescribed, and 18 introductions. Buchanan (1988) included the cardinal shiner as an Although we were aware of many of the impending undescribed Notropis (p. 225-226) in Arkansas. nomenclatural changes for Arkansas fishes, these antici- While the Fishes ofArkansas was in press, the for- pated changes were to be published subsequent to 1988 mal description of the cardinal shiner appeared in (e.g., Robins et al., 1991; Mayden, 1989) and we decided which Mayden (1988) designated Notropis pilsbryi to use established ichthyological nomenclature rather populations of the Arkansas River drainage of than acting prematurely in anticipation of possible Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri, in changes. addition to the Red River populations in Leis and Paxton (1993) in a review of Robins et al. Oklahoma, as a new species, Notropis cardinalis. (1991) reminded nonsystematists that instability in An addendeum to Robison and Buchanan nomenclature is understandably difficult for them, (1988:253) was added to note the change. Later, because they may not appreciate the dual purpose of Mayden (1989) formally elevated the subgenus binomial nomenclature: (1) to provide a "handle" for Luxilus ofNotropis to generic level. Luxilus pils- each species, and (2) to provide an hypothesis of relation- bryi is thus confined to the White River system of ships. Instability results as hypotheses change and as sys- Arkansas and Missouri. tematists interpret and implement the Code of Zoological 2. Scardinius erythrophthalmus (Linnaeus). Rudd. Nomenclature. The rudd is a wide ranging cyprinid native to Since the appearance of Robison and Buchanan (1988) Europe and central Asia (Berg, 1949; Banarescu, three important works affecting Arkansas fishes have 1964). The earliest verified date of the introduction been published, namely Mayden (1989), Robins et al. of the rudd to the United States was 1916 (Cahn, (1991), and Coburn and Cavender (1992). Mayden (1989) 1927). Courtney et al. (1986) provided a history of elevated a number of subgenera within the former the rudd's introduction and early distribution in cyprinid genera, Hybopsis and Notropis. The result has the United States. Inthe early 1980's the rudd been widespread nomenclatural changes which affect underwent an explosive anthropogenic dispersal Arkansas fishes. Review of recent revisions hopefully will similar to that of the common carp (Burkhead and assist the nonsystematist working with Arkansas fishes Williams,1991). The recent dispersal of the rudd who may be confused by, or unaware of, changes. was due primarily to successful marketing by the To keep workers on Arkansas fishes updated, recent Arkansas fish farming industry of the rudd as a changes in the Arkansas ichthyofauna are presented. new, hardy, and colorful bait minnow. The rudd Biologists employed by state and federal agencies, col- has been distributed in 14 states and has escaped leges and universities, or the private sector, need as com- or been released and subsequently captured in Dlete a record as possible before attempting to evaluate eight states (Pigg and Pham, 1990). The rudd has the impact of environmental alterations, population sta- become a popular bait fish used for striped bass tus, management, protocol, speciation events, and biogeo- fishing. Recently, Burkhead and Williams (1991) jraphic patterns or to direct students (Cashner and reported the disturbing news that the rudd could Vlatthews, 1988). hybridize with the golden shiner (Notemigonus Changes were grouped into two categories: Species crysoleucas). Jennings et al.(1990) reported the Additions and Nomenclatural Changes. rudd collected inthe open waters of Lonoke Proceedings Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.47, 1993 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 1993 145 145 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 47 [1993], Art. 40 County, Arkansas. The Game and Fish Formerly Notropis venustus. Commission received one verbal report of a single 8. Cyprinella whipplei Girard. Steelcolor shiner. specimen taken from the White River drainage fol- Formerly Notropis whipplei. lowing the December, 1987 flooding of over 4000 9. Erimystax harryi (Hubbs and Crowe). Ozark chub. acres of minnow farms inLonoke and Prairie The Ozark chub was formerly considered a sub counties. On 24 May 1991 Jeff Farwick collected species ofHybopsis dissimilis, the streamline chub. two specimens of the rudd inHorseshoe Lake, The streamline chub is now placed in the genus Crittenden County (Ken Shirley, pers. comm.). Erimystax (gender masculine) on the basis of recent genealogical analysis by Coburn and Cavender (1992) and Mayden (1989). Harris' Nomenclatural Changes (1986) dissertation provided the documentation for elevation ofHybopsis dissimilis harryi to Salmonidae ¦ Trouts species level. Because of the aforementioned stud- 1. Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Rainbow trout. ies this chub is now known as Erimystax harryi, the Two recent discoveries involving the rainbow trout Ozark chub. have necessitated a scientific name change for this 10. Erimystax x-punctatus (Hubbs and Crowe). Gravel and other trout species (Smith and Stearly, 1989). chub. Formerly known as Hybopsis x-punctata. See First, the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri above discussion on the genus Erimystax. Richardson, has been shown tobe the same as the 11. Luxiluschrysocephalus Rafinesque. Striped shiner. earlier described Kamchatka trout, Salmo mykiss Although Robison and Buchanan (1988) used the Walbaum. Second, studies of osteology (Vladykov, name Notropis chrysocephalus for the striped shiner 1963; Cavender and Miller,1982; and Sanford, in Arkansas, this form has been the source of 1987) and biochemistry (Berg and Ferris, 1984) of continuous debate for years. Mayden (1989) elevated trouts and salmons indicate that rainbow trout and the subgenus Luxilus ofNotropis to generic status, cutthroat trout and their relatives, the golden, an action supported by Coburn and Cavendar Mexican, Gila, and Apache trouts, are related more (1992) and used inRobins et al. (1991), thus we closely toPacific salmons (genus Oncorhynchus) recognize Luxilus chrysocephalus as the correct than to brown trout and Atlantic salmon (Salmo) name of the striped shiner. (See discussion by Smith and Stearly, 1989). Based 12. Luxiluspilsbryi (Fowler). Duskystripe shiner. on the arguments of these investigators, Robins et Formerly Notropis pilsbryi. al. (1991) accepted Oncorhynchus for the Pacific 13. Luxilus zonatus (Putnam). Bleeding shiner. salmonids leaving Salmo as the genus of salmonids Formerly Notropis zonatus. native to Europe, western Asia, and the Atlantic 14. Lythrurus fumeus (Evermann). Ribbon shiner. basin. Thus the rainbow trout becomes Formerly Notropis fumeus. This generic change is Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). due to Mayden's (1989) elevation of the Lythrurus 2. Oncorhynchus clarki (Rafinesque). Cutthroat trout. group to generic level. Smith and Stearly (1989) showed that relationships 15. Lythrurus snelsoni (Robison). Ouachita Mountain of the trouts of the cutthroat and rainbow series lie shiner. Formerly Notropis snelsoni. Although with the genus Oncorhynchus rather than Salmo. Robins et al. (1991) used the common name The cutthroat trout, formerly known as Salmo clar- Ouachita shiner, we retain the common name ki,is now O. clarki. Ouachita Mountain shiner as used by Robison (1985) as a more descriptive name for this Cyprinidae ¦ Carps and minnows. Ouachita Mountain endemic species. Changing

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us