Pleiotropic Functions of a Conserved Insect-Specific Hox Peptide Motif

Pleiotropic Functions of a Conserved Insect-Specific Hox Peptide Motif

Research article 5261 Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif Chris Todd Hittinger1,2, David L. Stern3 and Sean B. Carroll1,4,* 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 4Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Development 132, 5261-5270 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/dev.02146 Accepted 4 October 2005 Summary The proteins that regulate developmental processes in tissues while barely affecting others, suggesting that QA animals have generally been well conserved during function is preferentially required for a subset of Ubx evolution. A few cases are known where protein activities target genes. QA deletion homozygotes had a normal have functionally evolved. These rare examples raise the complement of limbs, but, at reduced doses of Ubx and the issue of how highly conserved regulatory proteins with abdominal-A (abd-A) Hox gene, ectopic limb primordia and many roles evolve new functions while maintaining old adult abdominal limbs formed when the QA motif was functions. We have investigated this by analyzing the absent. These results show that redundancy and the function of the ‘QA’ peptide motif of the Hox protein additive contributions of activity-regulating peptide motifs Ultrabithorax (Ubx), a motif that has been conserved play important roles in moderating the phenotypic throughout insect evolution since its establishment early in consequences of Hox protein evolution, and that pleiotropic the lineage. We precisely deleted the QA motif at the peptide motifs that contribute quantitatively to several endogenous locus via allelic replacement in Drosophila functions are subject to intense purifying selection. Development melanogaster. Although the QA motif was originally characterized as involved in the repression of limb Key words: Ultrabithorax, Distal-less, Limb, Hox, Evolution, Peptide formation, we have found that it is highly pleiotropic. motif, Trichome, Abdominal tergite, Postnotal, Laterotergite, Gene Curiously, deleting the QA motif had strong effects in some targeting, Allelic replacement, Homologous recombination Introduction functional conservation of selector proteins across phylum- Morphology evolves through changes in the genetic regulatory level evolutionary distances (Halder et al., 1995; Malicki et al., networks that govern development (Carroll, 2005; Carroll et 1990; McGinnis et al., 1990; Zhao et al., 1993). Highly al., 2005; Davidson, 2001; Stern, 2000). In principle, conserved regions have tended to be those most relevant for protein function. For example, in Hox proteins, the DNA- regulatory networks and gene expression can evolve by the binding homeodomain and the ‘hexapeptide’ or ‘YPWM’ modification of cis-regulatory elements or by alterations in the motif that interacts with the Extradenticle (Exd) co-factor activity or distribution of trans-acting factors. Transcription (Chang et al., 1995; Passner et al., 1999) are both well- factors regulate gene expression in trans by directly binding to conserved. However, most of the sequence of Hox proteins cis-regulatory elements. A group of transcription factors appears free to vary across phyla, suggesting that the specific referred to as selector proteins regulates extensive batteries of amino acid residues in these regions contribute less to protein target genes and can transform the identity of cells and tissues function. In several cases, selector protein functions have when misexpressed or misregulated (Garcia-Bellido, 1975; evolved (Galant and Carroll, 2002; Grenier and Carroll, 2000; Mann and Carroll, 2002). These include cell-type-specific Hanks et al., 1998; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Ronshaugen et al., proteins, as well as proteins with broader realms of action, such 2002; Shiga et al., 2002) or evolution has co-opted selectors as the region-specific Hox proteins. The need to properly for derived functions (Alonso et al., 2001; Lohr and Pick, 2005; regulate many target genes is expected to tightly constrain the Lohr et al., 2001; Stauber et al., 2002). These cases have evolution of selector proteins. Furthermore, selectors expressed generally involved regions outside of the DNA-binding domain in several different cell types and tissues throughout and have implicated synapomorphic (shared, derived) peptide development are anticipated to be especially pleiotropic and motifs conserved in subsets of related taxa (Hsia and highly constrained (Carroll, 2005; Carroll et al., 2005; Mann McGinnis, 2003). and Carroll, 2002; Stern, 2000). One of the most provocative cases of selector protein Several studies have demonstrated strong sequence and evolution correlates the acquisition of limb repression capacity 5262 Development 132 (23) Research article by the central class Hox selector protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) P{ry+t7.2=70FLP}11 P{v+t1.8=70I-SceI}2B nocSco/CyO, S2 virgin with the reduction of abdominal limb number in insects (Galant females, and Flp and I-SceI were induced by heat-shocking 0- to 3- and Carroll, 2002; Grenier and Carroll, 2000; Ronshaugen et day-old progeny for 1 hour at 38°C (Rong and Golic, 2000). F1 virgins with mosaic germlines (non-CyO, two or three per vial) were then al., 2002). Whereas insect Ubx possesses strong limb 1118 +t7.2 repression capacity when ectopically expressed in Drosophila crossed to w ; P{ry =70FLP}10 males and Flp was induced by melanogaster, crustacean (Artemia francisana) and heat-shocking 0- to 3-day-old progeny. Owing to concerns about potential difficulty activating whs in the eye from a location within or onychophoran (Acanthokara kaputensis) Ubx do not. near the Bithorax Complex (BX-C) (Bender and Hudson, 2000), Sequences in the C terminus of Ubx are responsible for much developing larvae and pupae were further heat-shocked every 3 days of this functional divergence. A. franciscana Ubx possesses until eclosion. Progeny were screened for non-mosaic red eyes, which putative casein kinase II sites that modulate activity, whereas were regarded as putative insertions (Rong and Golic, 2001). all insect Ubx orthologs contain the highly conserved C- Six putative insertions were obtained from 828 vials, four of which terminal ‘QA’ motif required for full Ubx repression activity mapped to the 3rd chromosome. Only targeted duplications that (Gebelein et al., 2002; Ronshaugen et al., 2002). This QA motif retained one complete copy of Ubx+ and a partial duplication of the ⌬QA is capable of conferring limb repression activity when grafted Ubx allele [a subset of Class II events (Rong and Golic, 2000)] onto onychophoran Ubx (Galant and Carroll, 2002). were useful for subsequent reduction. Candidate lines were screened The sufficiency of the QA motif to confer limb repression via PCR and restriction digestion for introduction of the novel AvrII site and loss of the novel XbaI site (which should have been eliminated capacity suggests that its acquisition during early insect during the repair of the double-strand break at the I-SceI site). evolution could have played an important role in the evolution Insertions were also screened to ensure the presence of a copy of Ubx+ of insects lacking adult abdominal limbs. However, little is with no AvrII site and to ensure both junctions with vector backbone known about the role of the QA motif in normal development. were intact. Only two independent Class II insertions fit all these For example, is the QA motif required for abdominal limb criteria; one insertion line (III65A) was selected for reduction to single repression in insects? Is this motif dedicated to limb repression, copy (Fig. 1B). or is it pleiotropic? What would be the phenotypic consequence III65A males were crossed to w1118; P{v+t1.8=hs-I-CreI.R}1A 1 of removing such a conserved part of an integral patterning Sb /TM6 virgin females, and 0- to 3-day-old progeny were heat- shocked for 1 hour at 36°C (Rong et al., 2002). F1 mosaic male gene? Hu To characterize the genetic and phenotypic role of the QA progeny were crossed to w; TM3, Sb/TM6B, Antp , Tb virgin females. Single F2 males with white eyes were recovered as TM6B- peptide motif of Ubx, we have precisely deleted this motif at balanced stocks for analysis; each reduction line was, thus, isogenous the endogenous Ubx locus via allelic replacement in D. for its 3rd chromosome. Reduction homozygotes were analyzed via melanogaster (Rong et al., 2002). The effects of deleting the PCR and restriction digestion as above, and only those retaining either QA motif were strong in some tissues but barely detectable in unduplicated Ubx+ or Ubx⌬QA alleles were analyzed further. To others. This finding of differential pleiotropy suggests that confirm that the alleles contained no artifactual mutations, we mapped peptide motifs in selector proteins can conditionally modulate the putative crossover points of three Ubx+ (lines A31, B2 and C3) ⌬ Development selector activity and need not be uniformly pleiotropic across and four Ubx QA (lines A30, B1, C4 and E7) reduction alleles by all tissues. We also find the requirement for the QA motif for sequencing overlapping PCR products from the entire manipulated limb repression to be dose dependent and partially redundant region of Ubx and surrounding sequence (see Table

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us