University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Papers and Anthropology 4-1996 Uruk Colonies and Anatolian Communities: An Interim Report on the 1992-1993 Excavations at Hacinebi, Turkey Gil J. Stein Reinhard Bernbeck Cheryl Coursey Augusta McMahon Naomi F. Miller University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers Recommended Citation Stein, G. J., Bernbeck, R., Coursey, C., McMahon, A., Miller, N. F., Misir, A., Nicola, J., Pittman, H., Pollock, S., & Wright, H. (1996). Uruk Colonies and Anatolian Communities: An Interim Report on the 1992-1993 Excavations at Hacinebi, Turkey. American Journal of Archaeology, 100 (2), 205-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/506903 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/35 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Uruk Colonies and Anatolian Communities: An Interim Report on the 1992-1993 Excavations at Hacinebi, Turkey Abstract The first Mesopotamian city-states in the Uruk period (ca. 3800-3100 B. C.) pursued a strategy of commercial expansion into neighboring areas of the Zagros Mountains, Syria, and southeastern Anatolia. Recent research in these areas has located several Uruk outposts, in what is apparently the world's earliest-known colonial system. Although some Uruk "colonies" have been excavated, virtually nothing is known about either the operation of this system or its role in the development of local polities in Anatolia. Excavations at the site of Hacinebi, on the Euphrates River trade route, investigate the effects of the "Uruk Expansion" on the social, economic, and political organization of southeastern Anatolia during the fourth millennium B. C. Hacinebi has two main Late Chalcolithic occupations - a pre-contact phase A and a later contact phase B with high concentrations of Uruk ceramics, administrative artifacts, and other Mesopotamian forms of material culture. The aH cinebi excavations thus provide a rare opportunity to investigate the relationship between the Uruk colonies and the local populations with whom they traded, while clarifying the role of long-distance exchange in the development of complex societies in Anatolia. Several lines of evidence suggest that the period of contact with Mesopotamia began in the Middle Uruk period, earlier than the larger colonies at sites such as Habuba Kabira-South and Jebel Aruda in Syria. The oncc entrations of Uruk material culture and the patterns of food consumption in the northeastern corner of the Local Late Chalcolithic settlement are consistent with the interpretation that a small group of Mesopotamian colonists lived as a socially distinct enclave among the local inhabitants of Hacinebi. There is no evidence for either Uruk colonial domination or warfare between the colonists and the native inhabitants of Hacinebi. Instead, the presence of both Anatolian and Mesopotamian seal impressions at the site best fits a ap ttern of peaceful exchange between the two groups. The ve idence for an essential parity in long-term social and economic relations between the Mesopotamian merchants and local inhabitants of Hacinebi suggests that the organization of prehistoric Mesopotamian colonies differed markedly from that of the better-known 16th-20th century European colonial systems in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. Author(s) Gil J. Stein, Reinhard Bernbeck, Cheryl Coursey, Augusta McMahon, Naomi F. Miller, Adnan Misir, Jeffrey Nicola, Holly Pittman, Susan Pollock, and Henry Wright This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/35 Uruk Colonies and Anatolian Communities: An Interim Report on the 1992-1993 Excavations at Hacinebi, Turkey GIL J. STEIN, REINHARD BERNBECK, CHERYL COURSEY, AUGUSTA McMAHON, NAOMI E MILLER, ADNAN MISIR, JEFFREY NICOLA, HOLLY PITTMAN, SUSAN POLLOCK, AND HENRY WRIGHT Abstract long-distance exchange in the development of complex societies in Anatolia. The first Mesopotamian city-states in the Uruk period Several lines of evidence suggest that the period of (ca. 3800-3100 B.C.) pursued a strategy of commercial contact with Mesopotamia began in the Middle Uruk expansion into neighboring areas of the Zagros Moun- period, earlier than the larger colonies at sites such as tains, Syria, and southeastern Anatolia. Recent research Habuba Kabira-South andJebel Aruda in Syria. The con- in these areas has located several Uruk outposts, in what centrations of Uruk material culture and the patterns is apparently the world's earliest-known colonial system. Although some Uruk "colonies" have been excavated, of food consumption in the northeastern corner of the Local Late Chalcolithic settlement are consistent with virtually nothing is known about either the operation of this system or its role in the development of local the interpretation that a small group of Mesopotamian colonists lived as a socially distinct enclave among the polities in Anatolia. local inhabitants of Hacmebi. There is no evidence for Excavations at the site of Hacmebi, on the Euphrates either Uruk colonial domination or warfare between River trade route, investigate the effects of the "Uruk the colonists and the native inhabitants of Hacinebi. In- Expansion" on the social, economic, and political or- ganization of southeastern Anatolia during the fourth stead, the presence of both Anatolian and Mesopotamian millennium B.C. Hacmebi has two main Late Chalcolithic seal impressions at the site best fits a pattern of peace- occupations - a pre-contact phase A and a later contact ful exchange between the two groups. The evidence for phase B with high concentrations of Uruk ceramics, ad- an essential parity in long-term social and economic rela- ministrative artifacts, and other Mesopotamian forms tions between the Mesopotamian merchants and local of material culture. The Hacinebi excavations thus pro- inhabitants of Hacmebi suggests that the organization vide a rare opportunity to investigate the relationship of prehistoric Mesopotamian colonies differed markedly between the Uruk colonies and the local populations from that of the better-known 16th-20th century Euro- with whom they traded, while clarifying the role of pean colonial systems in Africa, Asia, and the Americas.* * The 1992 and 1993 field seasons of the Joint $anliurfa sylvania), Jeffrey Nicola (Northwestern University), Susan Museum-Northwestern University salvage excavations at Pollock (State University of New York at Binghamton), Mar- Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey were codirected by Gil Stein (North- garet Reid (Guilford Technical Community College), Lewis western University) and Adnan Misir ($anliurfa Museum). Somers (GeoScan Research),Jill Weber (University of Penn- The excavations were funded with support from the Na- sylvania), and Henry Wright (University of Michigan). tional Endowment for the Humanities, National Geo- Illustrations used in this report were drawn or inked by graphic Society, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, North- Cheryl Coursey, Bethann Croft, Barbara Foster, Amy Lueker, western University, and generous private donors. Alan Lupton, Kristen Morrison, Susan Pollock, Margaret We wish to express our appreciation to Engin Ozgen, Reid, Gil Stein, Carlene Togul-Friedman, Jill Weber, and General Director of the Ministry of Culture's Directorate Henry Wright. of Monuments and Museums, for permission to conduct The senior author (Stein) completed this manuscript this research. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance with support from a National Endowment for the Human- of Kemal Ipik, the Muhtar of Ugurcuk village, for his ities Resident Scholarship at the School of American Re- hospitality and assistance in conducting excavations at search, Santa Fe. Hacinebi. The following abbreviations are used: In addition to the two codirectors, the 1992-1993 proj- Adams and R. McC. Adams and H. Nissen, The Uruk ect staff consisted of Ahmet Ayhan (Istanbul University), Nissen Countryside (Chicago 1972). Reinhard Bernbeck (Freie Universitait Berlin), Cheryl Algaze 1989 G. Algaze, "The Uruk Expansion: Cross- Coursey (State University of New York at Binghamton), cultural Exchange in Early Meso- Julia Frane (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), potamian Civilization," CurrAnthr 30 Hamza Gillfice ($anliurfa Museum), Kathryn Keith (Uni- (1989) 571-608. versity of Michigan), Nicola Laneri (Universita di Roma), Algaze 1993 G. Algaze, The Uruk World System (Chi- Alan Lupton (Cambridge University), Augusta McMahon cago 1993). (University of Chicago), Naomi E Miller (University of Penn- Deve Hiiyiik P.R.S. Moorey, Cemeteries of the First Mil- American Journal of Archaeology 100 (1996) 205-60 205 206 GIL J. STEIN ET AL. [AJA 100 INTRODUCTION from the site (pp. 233-39) and conclude that the Mesopotamian presence began in the mid-fourth mil- This article represents a collaborative effort to re- construct the chronology and economic organization lennium, significantly earlier than the larger and better-known Uruk colonies at Habuba Kabira-South of the site of Hacinebi in the Late Chalcolithic and Hellenistic periods. The first section, by Gil Stein and Jebel Aruda. Henry Wright and Reinhard and Adnan Misir, presents an overview of Hacinebi's Bernbeck's analysis of the chipped stone artifacts archaeological significance for the study of the Meso- (pp. 239-47)