Sphingomonas Alaskensis Sp. Nov., a Dominant Bacterium from a Marine Oligotrophic Environment

Sphingomonas Alaskensis Sp. Nov., a Dominant Bacterium from a Marine Oligotrophic Environment

International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2001), 51, 73–79 Printed in Great Britain Sphingomonas alaskensis sp. nov., a dominant bacterium from a marine oligotrophic environment M. Vancanneyt,1 F. Schut,2 C. Snauwaert,1 J. Goris,3 J. Swings1,3 and J. C. Gottschal2 Author for correspondence: M. Vancanneyt. Tel: j32 9 2645115. Fax: j32 9 2645092. e-mail: marc.vancanneyt!rug.ac.be 1,3 BCCM/LMG Bacteria Seven Gram-negative strains, isolated in 1990 from a 106-fold dilution series of Collection, K. L. seawater from Resurrection Bay, a deep fjord of the Gulf of Alaska, were Ledeganckstraat 351 and Laboratorium voor identified in a polyphasic taxonomic study. Analysis of 16S rDNA sequences Microbiology3 , University and DNA-homology studies confirmed the phylogenetic position of all strains of Gent, B-9000 Gent, in the genus Sphingomonas and further indicated that all of the strains Belgium constitute a single homogeneous genomic species, distinct from all validly 2 Department of described Sphingomonas species. The ability to differentiate the species, both Microbiology, University of Groningen, N-9750 AA phenotypically and chemotaxonomically, from its nearest neighbours justifies Haren, The Netherlands the proposal of a new species name, Sphingomonas alaskensis sp. nov., for this taxon. Strain LMG 18877T (l RB2256T l DSM 13593T) was selected as the type strain. Keywords: Sphingomonas alaskensis sp. nov., identification, polyphasic taxonomy, marine ultramicrobacterium INTRODUCTION readily obtained in culture but which mostly belong to a minority of the total community. Microbiologists have been intrigued by the phenom- Culture-independent molecular techniques are now enon of ‘unculturability’ for over half a century, widely used to obtain a thorough understanding of the especially with respect to bacteria in the open ocean identity and nature of the bacteria comprising marine (MacLeod, 1985). This notion has now virtually heterotrophic communities, because of their apparent reached the status of a dogma but is still based unculturability. This approach has indeed indicated primarily on the common observation that often the existence of numerous possibly ‘new’ and unusual numerically dominant marine bacteria cannot be uncultured bacteria (Amann et al., 1995; Britschgi & grown on agar surfaces (Austin, 1988; Giovannoni et Giovannoni, 1991; Fuhrman et al., 1992, 1993; al., 1995; Jannasch & Jones, 1959; Kogure et al., 1979, Giovannoni et al., 1990, 1995; Ho$ fle & Brettar, 1996; 1980; Poindexter & Leadbetter, 1986; Roszak & Mullins et al., 1995; Schmidt et al., 1991). The Colwell, 1987; Schut et al., 1997a, b; Van Es & Meyer- developments in the use of molecular probes for the Reil, 1982). These studies all point in the same direction detection of natural bacterial populations and for the and indicate that by using agar-plate counts and analysis of genetic diversity within communities have isolation procedures usually less than 0n1% of the total revolutionized our approach in microbial ecology so community that is observed by direct microscopy can much that they may create the impression that iso- be cultured. As a logical consequence of this situation, lation and cultivation of naturally occurring bacterial most of our knowledge on the physiological properties strains might soon cease to be required. However, the of marine bacteria is based on those species that are phylogenetic position that can be inferred from mol- ecular sequence data still tells us very little about the physiological properties of uncultured and unknown ................................................................................................................................................. strains. For this reason, the need for isolation of Abbreviations: FAS, filtered-autoclaved seawater; FAMEs, fatty acid methyl esters. bacteria from nature will remain essential in the The EMBL accession numbers for the sequences determined in this work foreseeable future (Schut et al., 1997a, b). Most inter- are AF145752 (1280 bp), AF145753 (1416 bp) and AF145754 (1428 bp), estingly, in a limited number of studies, in which both respectively. molecular and culture-dependent techniques were 01387 # 2001 IUMS 73 M. Vancanneyt and others used, there were indications that a small number of mobils, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Sphingomonas cultured bacteria in a marine environment did appear pruni, Sphingomonas sanguinis and Sphingomonas true- to account for up to 20% of the total bacterial peri. (2) The Sphingomonas yanoikuyae group com- community (Fuhrman et al., 1994; Moran et al., 1995; prises six species: Sphingomonas chlorophenolica, Rehnstam et al., 1993). Sphingomonas herbicidovorans, S. yanoikuyae and, at a Strain RB2256T was isolated from Resurrection Bay (a deeper level, the recently reclassified species Sphingo- deep fjord of the Gulf of Alaska) after a million-fold monas suberifaciens, Sphingomonas natatoria and dilution of an original seawater sample and a succesful Sphingomonas ursincola. (3) The Sphingomonas cap- enrichment using the dilution to extinction technique sulata-group contains six species: Sphingomonas aro- (Button et al., 1993; Schut et al., 1993). This indicates maticivorans, S. capsulata, Sphingomonas subterranea, that the organism was a numerically dominant member Sphingomonas stygia, Sphingomonas subarctica and of the indigenous community that amounts to approxi- Sphingomonas rosa. (4) A fourth cluster comprises the ' " species Sphingomonas macrogoltabidus and Sphingo- mately 0n2i10 bacteria mlV . This was subsequently supported by a Southern hybridization of PCR- monas terrae. amplified eubacterial 16S rDNA sequences from In the present study, it was our aim to identify and extracted community DNA from Resurrection Bay characterize strain RB2256T and to determine, in a seawater by using a strain RB2256T-specific probe polyphasic taxonomic study, its relatedness to six (Schut, 1994). analogous isolates from seawater samples from the Upon first cultivation, strain RB2256T was obligately same habitat. The results of 16S rDNA sequencing oligotrophic and could be grown only in liquid studies of these strains indicated that they all belong to seawater medium containing less than 1 mg dissolved the genus Sphingomonas. Determination of the DNA organic carbon per litre. Only after prolonged star- base ratios, DNA–DNA hybridizations, and cellular vation did the organism become culturable on fatty acid analyses indicated that the seven strains nutrient-enriched agar plates and corresponding liquid studied constitute, genotypically as well as chemotaxo- media, being described as facultatively oligotrophic nomically, a homogeneous taxon that is different from (Schut et al., 1993, 1997a, b; Schut, 1994). all other Sphingomonas species. An extensive pheno- T typic analysis was performed in order to describe the Since its isolation in 1990, strain RB2256 has been new species and to differentiate it from the other studied extensively because of its interesting physio- Sphingomonas species. The name Sphingomonas alask- logical properties. The organism fulfils all of the ensis sp. nov. is proposed. criteria for a ‘model oligotroph’. The strain possesses high-affinity substrate-uptake systems, the ability to METHODS take up mixed substrates simultaneously, and is very $ small in size (‘ultramicro’; less than 0n1 µm ) (Schut et Isolation conditions. Seawater samples were taken from a al., 1993, 1997a; Schut, 1994; Eguchi et al., 1996). The depth of 10 m below the surface near the centre of Res- cells have a DNA content of approximately 25% of urrection Bay of the Gulf of Alaska (60m E03h N, 149m E that of a single Escherichia coli genome (Schut et al., 25h W) and collected in acid-washed, thoroughly rinsed Niskin bottles with fired (550 C) glassware on 24 March m & ' 1993) and appear to be resistant to various stress- 1990. Samples were diluted 10 –10 -fold into fired glass inducing agents (Eguchi et al., 1996; Schut et al., tubes with filtered-autoclaved seawater (FAS). During in- 1997a; Joux et al., 1999). Taken together, these cubation of these tubes, growth was monitored over a period characteristics have led some authors to define the of up to 2 months by flow cytometry or epifluorescence strain as an ‘oligotrophic ultramicrobacterium’ (Schut, 1994). Schut et al. (1993) demonstrated that none of (Eguchi et al., 1996; Schut et al., 1997a, b; Fegatella et the cultures enriched and isolated via this dilution culture al., 1998). could be cultivated directly onto nutrient-rich agar media. Growth was observed only when FAS or synthetic seawater In the course of these previous studies, the 16S rDNA T T medium containing less than approximately 1 mg carbon sequence of strain RB2256 (LMG 18877 ) was per litre was used as the medium. However, storage of determined and deposited in the EMBL database as stationary-phase cultures for at least 6–12 months at 5–8 mC Z73631. It was shown that the isolate belongs to the α- triggered a (so far, unexplained) process that resulted in the Proteobacteria and, more particularly, to the genus development of the ability to grow on high-nutrient lab- Sphingomonas (Schut, 1994). oratory media. All experiments in the present study were performed with subcultures of the latter strains. The genus Sphingomonas is phylogenetically hetero- Bacterial strains and growth conditions. Data on the origin geneous and currently comprises 23 validly described of the isolates and reference strains studied are listed in species. At least the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us