Research Communication Folk Knowledge of an Individual Plant Specimen: The Case of the Royal Fern (Osmunda regalis L.) in Virestad Parish, Småland, Sweden Ingvar Svanberg Author Addresses: Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Box 514, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden [email protected] Received: February 23, 2012 Volume 3: 63-67 Published: November 5, 2012 © 2012 Society of Ethnobiology Abstract: Ethnobiological studies of local economic or folk religious uses of plants often rely on the assumption that plant use relates to folk knowledge about specific taxa. However, in some cases, folk knowledge is more about beliefs concerning an individual plant. When Carl Linnaeus traveled in 1749 through his native province of Småland, Sweden, he observed a striking specimen of a royal fern (Osmunda regalis L.), which was being used by a local healer. The appearance and unusually large size of this individual plant specimen were possibly responsible for its use. This species has not been used elsewhere in Sweden and historical data refer only to the single specimen observed by Linnaeus. Key words: healer’s knowledge, historical ethnobiology, intra-cultural diversity, Carl Linnaeus, folk knowledge. Introduction in the healing power of plants, as well as others who do Today, as local ecological knowledge is rapidly not hold that belief. Attitudes can also change over disappearing and to a great extent has already been lost time within a community or during an individual’s in most post-industrialized countries in Europe, lifetime (Anderson 2000; Pieroni 2003; Svanberg et al. historical data in archives are of particular interest to 2011). ethnobiologists (Heinrich et al. 2006; Łuczaj 2008; There are additional concerns that are important Sõukand et al. 2010; Svanberg et al. 2011). However, when considering plant knowledge surrounding the use the information the ethnobiologist acquires concerning of a specific taxon. When studying the cultural contexts various kinds of past local and traditional plant between plants and people, many ethnobiologists focus knowledge must be understood in its proper historical, on, and generalize about, a plant species or a folk ecological, and cultural context as much as is possible taxon. Although scholars have increasingly moved using historical records. Plant knowledge is not only a away from cataloguing the use of various taxa, scientific question of how a plant was used, but also when, where or folk-defined species continue to be the focus of and by whom. These are simple, but crucial questions scholarly interest. It is important, however, for the for ethnobiologists to ask and answer in order to ethnobiologist to be able to shift scale from species to understand the context of plant knowledge. populations to individuals, as plant knowledge can vary It is well documented that people in traditional from knowledge about a species to intimate knowledge societies all over the world had an intimate familiarity about a single plant. with local plants (Lévi-Strauss 1962). However, this knowledge varies within communities. Attention to Materials and Methods intra-community and intra-cultural diversity of In some cases, healers or other users can develop a knowledge has increased among researchers (Pelto and relationship with a specific plant. Specific trees, for Pelto 1975; Reyes-García et al. 2007; Newkirk et al. instance have been of great importance in traditional 2009). Clearly, knowledge about plants is not equally plant lore in Scandinavia. Various customs and distributed within a particular community; certain skills medicinal practices have been connected with are specific to men, women or children, others to individual trees (Sydow 1935). Often, a strange certain categories such as healers, craftsmen or other appearance or an unusual growth is the reason why specialists within a community. Knowledge may also these particular trees were chosen for such purposes vary according to economic and social context. (Sydow 1973). The use of specific tree specimens for Particular groups can comprise individuals who believe healing purposes was quite common in Scandinavian 63 Research Communication folk medicine (Sydow 1935; Brøndegaard 1978), a the inhabitants of Virestad call the bush for phenomenon that is also encountered elsewhere (e.g., Ingeborg i Märhult’s predikstol ‘the pulpit of Blackman 1925; Egenter 1981). Ingeborg of Mjärhult’ (Linnaeus 1751). However, it is rare that individual healers develop a The fern specimen was (for Swedish examples of the unique tie to a single small plant specimen. Such was species) an imposing example of Osmunda vulgaris L. the case with a single royal fern used by a local healer in Linnaeus writes that it was about 1.2 meters high and Virestad parish in the Swedish province of Småland in 3.6 meters in diameter (Linnaeus 1751). Not the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. It was surprisingly it was looked on more as a shrub (‘buske’) discovered by Carl Linnaeus during his travels in than a fern. Sweden in the 1740s and recorded in his notes. This Linnaeus had had already written about the healer relationship is analyzed here using narrative sources Mother Ingeborg just after her death during his visit in and source criticism, which relies on circumstantial 1741 (Linnaeus 1745). She was famous all over the evidence to take advantage of indications and clues country as a seeress and as a folk-healer, and she was a available from a limited number of sources (Myrdal well-known local healer in this part of Småland. Little 2009). biographical data are available, but apparently she During his travels in various Swedish provinces learned to use plants in remedies from her mother, and between 1732 and 1749, Linnaeus observed and noted she gathered various plants and grasses during interesting empirical data about folk biology, which are Midsummer Eve for that purpose. At seventy years of of relevance for ethnobiologists. The information age, Ingeborg was put on trial in 1740 for acting as a Linnaeus gathered during his fieldwork was rendered in healer. his Flora lapponica (1737) and Flora svecica (1755), both According to records made by Linnaeus himself, published in Latin and therefore extensively read by an Mother Ingeborg could describe her patients' illness international audience. These published data about simply by handling their clothes. She thought that every local Swedish and Sámi folk biology give very little person had a double that followed them like a reversed contextual information, but they have become widely reflection in calm water or as an antipode in a distributed in the scientific community. The origin of downwards position. If the double should injure an much of this information has been obscured, and the underground spirit, the person fell ill. The illness was information about folk knowledge is usually stripped cured by pouring milk or something similar into a from botanical handbooks. However, thanks to the northbound stream, on a tree or in a churchyard. travelogues Linnaeus published and his preserved Unfortunately no further information about her use of hand-written travel diaries, some contextual plants or healing methods is available. information about when, where, and from whom he gathered his data about the use of certain plants exists. The plant name safsabuske was recorded for the first His travelogues, rather than the floras he published, are time by Linnaeus in Virestad 1749. The etymology of important sources for ethnobiological research. the name remains obscure. Although the royal fern is the largest fern species in Sweden, which grew along Results: Linnaeus and Folk Biological Knowledge small rivers and brooks with oligotrophic water, no With Linnaeus’ notes as the exception there are no other local names have been recorded. The species available records about local knowledge of the royal occurred – and still occurs – here and there in the fern (Osmunda vulgaris L.) in Sweden. When Linnaeus southernmost part of Sweden north to mid-Småland. traveled through his native province of Småland on the With its striking appearance, this impressive fern road to the southernmost province Skåne, in May 1749, species must have attracted the interest of the he made the following annotation when he passed peasantry. However, if such was the case, it is Virestad parish: surprising that oral folk records in archives and ‘Safsa-buske [= Royal fern bush] was a published sources have nothing to say about the plant. renowned plant in Virestad parish, which was Discussion only to be found in one place, that is to say a Ferns have played an important role in Scandinavian small islet in Fanhult’s creek. The wise and European folk botany. The many folk-views about woman, known as Ingeborg in Mjärhult, used, them held across large parts of Eurasia have been when she lived in Mjärhult, to visit this bush discussed by Gunda (1989). However, information during the mornings in silence, and fasting, to about the Osmunda vulgaris from Småland is a very local consult with, I know not whom. This is why tradition tied specifically to the specimen observed by 64 Research Communication Linnaeus. Only this particular plant specimen was used for this must have been that the Virestad specimen was by the local healers. Nothing is known about the large and outstanding in many ways. Scholars have long species’ role in the folk botany of other parts of emphasized the significance of ‘the unusual’ in popular Sweden or in Denmark. However, John Gerard in his belief and folk perceptions of other organisms (Sydow herbal 1597 and Nicholas Culpepper in his herbal 1653 1973; Kolosova 2010). The other reason is that local recommended its rhizomes for medical use (Grieve wise persons discovered the plant and developed a kind 1931). It has also been mentioned in recent Southern of mythical tradition around it. Therefore, the European and British folk medicine (Vickery 1995; biocultural domain that materialized in this relationship Molina et al.