NTSB Report on Air Illinois Flight

NTSB Report on Air Illinois Flight

TRANSPORTATION SAFEN BOAR5 AIR ILLINOIS HAWKER SlDDLEY HS 748-2A, N748hl- &EAR PfNGKNEYVILtE, IthlNOS OCTOBER 41. 4983 TECWIUIL REPORT DOWENTMlOt4 i%G€ Re ort No 2.6overnment Accession No. 3-Recipient's Catalog ik. NT&/AAR-85 fO3 PB85-910403 I. Ti t le and Sobt i t le Aircraft AtsatReport -Air 5.k rt Date Illinois Hawker Sidc?ley HS 74&2A, N7C8LL, Nwr &I?5,1985 Pinckneyville, Illinois, October 11, ? 9C3 6.Performing Organization I Code F1. Author(s1 B.Periorming Organizatim Report No. I 1. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.York Unit No. I 3888-B National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation 1l.tontract or Grant No. I Washin,D.C. 20594 ~ 13 .Type of Report and Period Covered 12.5ponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report 1 October 11,1983 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Uashington. D. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Cede 16-Abstract On October 11, 1983, Air PJinois Flight 710 was being operated as a reguIarI: scheduled -er flight between Capital Airport, Springfield, Illinois am! Southern mi Airpo;t, Carbondale, IElimk. About 2020 central daylight time, Flight 710 departed Springfie& with seven passengers and three crewmembers on board. About 1.5 minutes later, Piigtt 71 called SpringZreld deperture control and reported that it had experienced a slight eIectrica problem but that it was continuing to its destination about 40 minutes away. The cockpit voice recorder 1CVR) tra'mript showed that &?ET &@&of Flight 710% left generator suffer4 a eampieie mechanical failure and that in respond= t:, thm faiIure of the left generator, the first officer mistakenly isolated the right geerator and M right generatar bus bar from the airplane's d.c. electrical distribution -*em and, thereafter, tb right generator disconnected from the right generator bus bar. ALf subsequent attempts t' restore the right generator to the airplane's d.c electrical distribution system were -msucce&ul and the airplane proceeded toward Carbondale relying solely on its batteries for d-e. electrim power. The flight toward Carbondale was mndueted in instrument meteorologic# conditions. The cloud bases in the area of the accident were at 2,000 feet m.s.1. with tops a 10,000 feet. Visibility below the cloud bases was 1 mile in rain, and there were xattere thunderstorms in the area. 17. Key Words I18.Distribution Statement Loss of &e. electrical power from I This document is available both airplane generat-; decision to continue flight; f to the public through the inadequate asessment of risks involved in continued National Technical Informa- flight; self-imposed psychological factors. tion Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 I I5.Secority Classification 20.Security Classification 121.No. of Pages 22.Price (of this report) (of this page) 94 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASS I F I ED UTSB Form 1765.2 (Rev. 9/74) CONTENTS .opsIs .......................... 1 FAcTaALIiWORHATiON ................... 2 ... 1.1 History of Flight ....................... 2- ~ . 1.2 Injuries to Persons ................... .. .. 4' 1.3 Damage to Airplane ...................... 4 1.4 Other Damage ........................ 4 1.5 Personnellinformation ..................... 4 1-6 Airphe Information ..................... 5 1.6.1 Flight Logbookand Maintenance Discrepancy Form Writeup .... 5 1-62 Maintenance Organization and Roeedures ............ 8 1.6.3 Electrical System Malfunction History .............. 9 1.7 Meteorological Information ................... 9 1.8 Aids to Navigation ...................... 12 1.9 Communications ....................... 12 1-10 Aerodrome Information .................... 12 1.11 Flight Recorders ....................... 12 2-12 WreckageandImpact Information ................ 14 1.13 Medical and Pathological Information .............. 16 1.14 Fire .............................. 16 1.15 Survivsl ........................... 16 1.16 Tests and Research ...................... 16 1.16.1 Examination of Airplane Electrical Compsnents ........... 16 1-16-2 Generator Operational Tests .................. 21 1.16.3 Human Performance Information ................ 21 1.17 Other Information ....................... 24 Hawker Siddley 748-2A EIectrical System ............ 24 Generator Normal and Emergency Procedures........... 29 Flightcrew Training ...................... 31 1-17.4 Electrical Load Analysis .................... 34 1.17.5 FAASurveillance ....................... 34 1-17.6 Other FAA Actions ...................... 41 1.11.7 AirplaneRightfxth ...................... 42 2. .ALysIs .......................... 42 2.1 Generator Failures ...................... 43 2.2 Operational &idHuman Performance Factors ........... 45 2.3 Maintenance Procedures .................... 56 2.4 FAASurveilIance ....................... 58 3. CONCLusIoNs ........................ 61 3.1 Findings ........................... 61 3.2 P1.obeble Cause ........................ 62 4. BECOMBENDATIONS ..................... 62 5 . APPENDi'XEs ........................ 65 Appendix A-Investigation and Public Hearing ........... 65 Appendix B-- Personnel Information ............... 66 P.ppeMix C.. Aircraft Information ............... 67 Appendix D-- Cockpit Yoice Recorder .............. 69 Appendix E.. HS 748-2A Electrical Load AnaIysis ......... 90 Appendii P-. Airplane Ground Track .............. 92 iii NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHMGTON, DX. 20594 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Adopted: March 5,1985 AIR ILLINOIS HAWKER SIDDLEZ HS 148-2A, N748LL NEAR PINCKNEYVILLF!, ILLNOIS OCTOBER 11,1983 SYNOpsls On October 11, 1983, Air Illinois Plight 720 w8s being operated as a regularly scheduled passenger flight between Capital Airport, SpriQgfieId, Illinois and Southern Illinois Airport, Carbondale, Illinois. About 2020 central daylight time, Flight 710 departed Springfield with seven passengers and three crewmembers on board. About 1.5 minutes later, Flight 710 called Springfield departure control and reported that it had experienced a slight electrical problem but that it was continuing to its destination about 40 minutes away. The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript showed that shortly after Weoff Flight 710's left generator suffered e complete mechanical failure and that in responding to the faiirtre of the left generator, the first officer mistakeniy isolated the right generator and the right generator bus bar from the airplane's d.c. electrical distribution system and, thereafter, the right generator disconnected from the eight generator bus bar. -4ll subsequent attempts to restore the right generator to the airplane's d.c. electrical D distribution system were unsuccessful, and the airplane proceeded toward Carbondale relying solely on its batteries for d.c. electrical power. The flight toward Carbondale was conducted in instrument meteorological conditions. The cloud bases in the area of the accident were at 2,000 feet m.s.1. with tops at 10,000 feet. Visibility below the cloud bases was 1 mile in rain, and there were scattered thunderstorms in the area. About 2053, while the airplane was descending from its instrument flight rules @FR) assigned altitude of 3,000 feet, battery power was depleted. Flight 710 continued to descend, turned about 1809 and crashed in a rural area near Pincknewille, Illinois, about 22 nmi north northwest of the Southern Illinois Airport. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces, and all 10 persons on board the airplane were killed. There was no postcrash fire. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the accident was the captain's decision to continue the flight toward the more distant destination airport after the loss of d.c. electricel power from both airplane generators instead of returning to the nearby departure sirport. The captaink decision was adversely affected by szlf-imposed psychological factors which led him to assess inadequately the airp1ane.s battery endurance after the loss of generator power and the magnitude of the :isks involved in continuing to the destination airport. Contributing to the accident was the airline management's feihre to provide and the FAA's failure to asswe an adequate -2- company recurrent flightcrew training program which contributed to the captain's inability to assess properly the battery enduranee of the airplane before making the decision to continue, and led to the inability of the captain and the first officer to cope promptly ,d correctly with the airplane's electrical malfunction. 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1 Histom of Pligfit On October 11, 1983, Air Illinois Flight 71", a Hawker Siddley 748-2A was being operated as a regularly scheduled passenger flight ' etween Chicago, Illinois, and the Southern Illinois Airport, Carbondale, Illinois, with an E route stop at Springfield, Illinois. The flight was about 45 minutes behind schedule when it arrived at Capitol Airport, Springfield, Zinois, about 2005. 1/ The flightcreu- remained on board while the airplane was loaded with 300 gallons of jG-A fuel. The flightcrew did not report any mechanical malfunctions to either the Air Illinois controlling dispatcher in Carbondale or to the ramp personnel at Springfield. Air Illinois station personnel gave the flightcrew documents containing the latest Carbondale weather and the airplane load information which had been prepared by the compaay dispatcher in Carbondale. -4t 2011, at the request of Flight 710, the flight service specialist at the Decatur, Illinois Flight Service Station provided the flightcrew with the latest Carbondale weather and the St. Louis, Missouri, winds

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    94 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us