Takeovers + Schemes Review

Takeovers + Schemes Review

TAKEOVERS + SCHEMES REVIEW 2017 GTLAW.COM.AU 1 TAKEOVERS + SCHEMES REVIEW 2017 GILBERT + TOBIN PRESENTS THE 2017 TAKEOVERS AND SCHEMES REVIEW 2016 was a solid but unspectacular year for Australian public company mergers and acquisitions. Some key themes were: + Number and value of transactions down from 2015 but aggregate transaction values were still higher than 2014. + 2016 saw a record number of all-cash transactions. There was a shift away from creative consideration structures. In general, target boards and shareholders seemed to value certainty in uncertain political and economic times. + Schemes of arrangement were increasingly the transaction structure of choice. + Despite negativity in respect of the Government/FIRB’s approach to the Ausgrid and Kidman transactions, foreigners continued to bid for Australian companies and were generally successful. + ASIC and the ACCC were highly active in their transaction reviews. This Review examines 2016’s public company transactions valued over $50 million and provides our perspective on the trends for Australian M&A in 2016 and what that might mean for 2017. We trust you will find this Review to be an interesting read and a useful resource for 2017. 2 CONTENTS KEY HIGHLIGHTS 4 1 MARKET ACTIVITY 6 2 SECTOR ANALYSIS 9 3 TRANSACTION STRUCTURES 13 4 FOREIGN BIDDERS 15 5 CONSIDERATION STRUCTURES 19 6 SUCCESS FACTORS 22 7 TRANSACTION TIMING 27 8 IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENTS 29 AND BID CONDITIONS 9 THE REGULATORS 32 2016 PUBLIC M&A TRANSACTIONS 36 OUR APPROACH 38 ABOUT GILBERT + TOBIN 40 RECENT TRANSACTIONS 41 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 46 AWARDS AND RECOGNITION 50 GILBERT + TOBIN M&A PARTNERS 51 3 TAKEOVERS + SCHEMES REVIEW 2017 KEY HIGHLIGHTS TRANSACTION ACTIVITY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ALL TIME LOW FOR DOWN, BUT VALUES THE CLEAR PREFERRED ENERGY & RESOURCES, STEADY TRANSACTION STRUCTURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND GAMING PROVIDE DEAL FLOW There were 30 public M&A transactions Almost 70% of all transactions reviewed In 2016, only 10% of all transactions valued over $50 million in 2016, a proceeded by scheme of arrangement (representing just 1% of aggregate deal decline from 2014 and 2015 which had as opposed to takeover bid. This was a value) involved a target company in 37 transactions each. The aggregate significant increase on previous years the energy & resources sector. These value of those transactions in 2016 was where the split between schemes and are the lowest levels in the 6 years we $24.6 billion. While lower than 2015, the takeovers has been around the 50% have been producing this Review. 2016 aggregate deal value was actually higher mark. The preference for schemes was saw transport & logistics, professional than the aggregate value of transactions even more pronounced for high value services and gaming provide the in 2014. In our view, the aggregate value transactions: 83% of transactions valued significant proportion of public M&A of transactions in 2015 (over $46 billion) over $1 billion were done by scheme. activity. Sectors to watch in 2017 could was an outlier, with an unusual number It seems that bidders and targets are include utilities & infrastructure, food/ of very high value transactions. In that increasingly preferring friendly and FMCG and real estate. respect, 2016 may be best characterised agreed transactions and the greater as an unspectacular, but solid, year for certainty of timetable and outcome that public M&A in Australia. a scheme provides. PUBLIC M&A TRANSACTIONS 30VALUED OVER $50 MILLION IN 2016, A DECLINE FROM 2014 AND 2015 WHICH HAD 37 TRANSACTIONS EACH 4 FOREIGN BIDDERS ARE IN AN UNCERTAIN REGULATORS CONTINUE STILL BUYING AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TO BE HIGHLY ACTIVE IN COMPANIES ENVIRONMENT, SIMPLICITY M&A TRANSACTIONS AND CERTAINTY CAN GET DEALS DONE Foreign investment attracted more than The trend of transactions offering Consistent with its broader approach, its share of headlines in 2016, often for scrip or more creative consideration ASIC continued its active role in the wrong reasons. structures did not repeat in 2016. Australian M&A transactions in 2016. Cash was the clear preferred form of Its activities in other areas also impacted Foreign investment approval reviews consideration. 73% of all transactions on takeovers, such as its strong focus on often took longer than desired. This offered all cash consideration in 2016, IPO disclosure, the principles of which was exacerbated by a longer than usual compared with 61% in 2015. Further, also apply to takeover disclosure. caretaker period around the July federal the average premium to pre-offer election, given the extra time needed The ACCC has also intensified its trading prices in 2016 was 39%, before it was clear the Coalition parties consideration of M&A transactions, materially less than 50% in 2015. One could form Government with a slim with its chairman Mr Rod Sims going interpretation of these two observations majority achieved in the election. so far as to say that companies need to is that in 2016’s uncertain political and consider avenues for growth other than Separately, foreign bidders were denied economic climate, target boards and the ‘easy route’ of M&A. the chance to buy Ausgrid right at the shareholders were willing to accept end of a long auction process. Much was a lower price as long as there was It is clear that regulatory approvals said and written about the Government certainty of exit and value. will be important to the success of and FIRB’s approach to the proposed many public company transactions in Kidman transactions. 2017. Bidders that can present clean transactions without regulatory hurdles Despite all this, the data for Australian (or ready-made solutions to any issues) public M&A in 2016 shows that to target boards and shareholders will foreigners continued to bid for have a competitive advantage. Australian companies, and were generally successful in closing those transactions. Almost 50% of bidders in 2016 were foreign, led by Asia and North America. The success rate for transactions by foreign bidders in 2016 was 92%, compared to 88% for all 73%OF ALL TRANSACTIONS OFFERED ALL CASH bidders (foreign and domestic). CONSIDERATION IN 2016 5 TAKEOVERS + SCHEMES REVIEW 2017 1 MARKET ACTIVITY Transaction volume decreases, but a solid $5 billion + deals continue year for public M&A transactions The Qube-led consortium finalised its transaction terms and 2016 was a solid, if unspectacular, year for public M&A executed the $8.9 billion acquisition of Asciano in 2016, transactions in Australia. navigating various regulatory issues in the process. There were only 30 transactions valued over $50 million in Tabcorp announced its proposed acquisition of Tatts, valuing the 2016. This was down from 37 transactions in each of the last 2 company in excess of $6 billion. At the time of publication, it years. That said, 2016 was still higher than the low point of 24 remains to be seen whether a Macquarie-led consortium can transactions in 2013. succeed in presenting a superior offer to the Tabcorp proposal. Transactions per year by number Transactions per year by value 42 45 46.0 6 37 37 45 40 9 11 30 35 6 24 30 24.6 36 5 25 22.1 23.7 20 16.1 28 26 24 15 19 10 5 Total value of transactions (A$ billions) Total 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Number of $50m to $1bn transactions Number of $1bn+ transactions Total value of transactions Aggregate transaction values also declined significantly in Perhaps an encouraging sign in an otherwise subdued year is 2016. The total value of all transactions for listed companies in that a number of very large transactions were announced in Australia fell from just over $46 billion in 2015 to $24.6 billion 2016. Indeed, aggregate transaction values in 2016 actually in 2016. exceeded that of 2012, even though the number of transactions However, as the following graph reflects, 2015 was perhaps in 2012 was 40% higher. an outlier with a number of extremely high value transactions Two transactions valued over $5 billion were announced in announced, including Japan Post’s $6.5 billion acquisition of 2016, compared to 3 in 2015, and none in any of the years Toll and the $7.9 billion merger of Federation Centres and between 2011 and 2015. These transactions both involved Novion. 2016’s transaction values appear more consistent multiple bidders seeking to acquire the target. with previous years’ values. 6 Fall in $1 billion to $5 billion transactions Transaction highlights The reduction in aggregate transaction values from the highs of 2015 is best explained by the fall in the number of transactions valued between $1 billion and $5 billion. There were 8 of these + Qube consortium’s $8.9 billion acquisition transactions in 2015, falling to only 3 in 2016, being: $5 of Asciano by scheme BILLION+ + + HanesBrands’ $1.1 billion acquisition of Pacific Brands; Tabcorp’s proposed $6.35 billion acquisition of Tatts by scheme + Advent International’s $1.04 billion acquisition of Nuplex Industries; and + Baring Asia Private Equity’s $1.01 billion acquisition of SAI Global, + HanesBrands’ $1.1 billion acquisition of all by scheme of arrangement and in each case only just over the Pacific Brands by scheme $1 billion mark. $1 BILLION+ + Advent International’s $1.04 billion acquisition of Nuplex Industries by scheme Distribution of transaction values + Baring Asia Private Equity’s $1.01 billion 2 3 acquisition of SAI Global by scheme > 5000 0 3 8 1000 - 5000 + Zurich Insurance’s proposed $741 million 9 $500 acquisition of Cover-More Group by

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    52 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us