P-Laplace Operator, Quasiregular Mappings, and Picard-Type Theorems 1. Introduction

P-Laplace Operator, Quasiregular Mappings, and Picard-Type Theorems 1. Introduction

Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quasiconformal Mappings and their Applications (IWQCMA05) p-Laplace operator, quasiregular mappings, and Picard-type theorems Ilkka Holopainen and Pekka Pankka Abstract. We describe the role of p-harmonic functions and forms in the theory of quasiregular mappings. Keywords. Quasiregular mapping, p-harmonic function, p-harmonic form, conformal capacity. 2000 MSC. Primary 58J60, 30C65; Secondary 53C20, 31C12, 35J60. Contents 1. Introduction 69 2. -harmonic functions 72 A 3. Morphism property and its consequences 75 3.1. Sketch of the proof of Reshetnyak's theorem 77 Further properties of f 79 4. Modulus and capacity inequalities 80 5. Liouville-type results for -harmonic functions 82 A 6. Liouville-type results for quasiregular mappings 88 7. Picard-type theorems 89 8. Quasiregular mappings, p-harmonic forms, and de Rham cohomology 97 References 100 1. Introduction In this survey we emphasize the importance of the p-Laplace operator as a tool to prove basic properties of quasiregular mappings, as well as Liouville- and Picard-type results for quasiregular mappings between given Riemannian manifolds. Quasiregular mappings were introduced by Reshetnyak in the mid sixties in a series of papers; see e.g. [36], [37], and [38]. An interest in studying these mappings arises from a question about the existence of a geometric function theory in real dimensions n 3 generalizing the theory of holomorphic functions ≥ C C: ! 70 Ilkka Holopainen and Pekka Pankka IWQCMA05 Definition 1.1. A continuous mapping f : U Rn of a domain U Rn is called quasiregular (or a mapping of bounded distortion! ) if ⊂ 1;n n (1) f Wloc (U; R ); and (2) there2 exists a constant K 1 such that ≥ n f 0(x) K J (x) for a.e. x U: j j ≤ f 2 The condition (1) means that the coordinate functions of f belong to the 1;n local Sobolev space Wloc (U) consisting of locally n-integrable functions whose distributional (first) partial derivatives are also locally n-integrable. In Condi- tion (2) f 0(x) denotes the formal derivative of f at x, i.e. the n n matrix × Djfi(x) defined by the partial derivatives of the coordinate functions fi of f. Furthermore, f 0(x) = max f 0(x)h j j h =1j j j j is the operator norm of f 0(x) and Jf (x) = det f 0(x) is the Jacobian determinant of f at x. They exist a.e. by (1). The smallest possible K in Condition (2) is the outer dilatation KO(f) of f. If f is quasiregular, then n J (x) K0`(f 0(x)) a.e. f ≤ for some constant K0 1, where ≥ `(f 0(x)) = min f 0(x)h : h =1j j j j The smallest possible K0 is the inner dilatation KI (f) of f. It is easy to n 1 n 1 see by linear algebra that KO(f) KI (f) − and KI (f) KO(f) − . If max K (f); K (f) K, f is called≤K-quasiregular. ≤ f O I g ≤ To motivate the above definition, let us consider a holomorphic function f : U C; where U C is an open set. We write f as a mapping f = ! ⊂ (u; v): U R2; U R2; ! ⊂ f(x; y) = u(x; y); v(x; y) : Then u and v are harmonic real-valued functionsin U and they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann system of equations D1u = D2v D u = D v; 2 − 1 2 where D1 = @=@x; D2 = @=@y: For every (x; y) U, the differential f 0(x; y): R 2 ! R2 is a linear map whose matrix (with respect to the standard basis of the plane) is D u D u D u D u 1 2 = 1 2 : D v D v D u D u 1 2 − 2 1 Hence 2 (1.1) f 0(x; y) = det f 0(x; y): j j p-Laplace operator, quasiregular mappings, and Picard-type theorems 71 The first trial definition for mappings f : U Rn of a domain U Rn, sharing some geometric and topological properties !of holomorphic functions,⊂ could be mappings satisfying a condition n (1.2) f 0(x) = J (x); x U: j j f 2 However, it has turned out that, in dimensions n 3; a mapping f : U Rn 1;n n ≥ ! belonging to the Sobolev space Wloc (U; R ) and satisfying (1.2) for a.e. x U is either constant or a restriction of a M¨obius map. This is the so-called generalized2 Liouville theorem due to Gehring [12] and Reshetnyak [38]; see also the thorough discussion in [29]. Next candidate for the definition is obtained by replacing the equality (1.2) by a weaker condition n (1.3) f 0(x) K J (x) a.e. x U; j j ≤ f 2 n where K 1 is a constant. Note that Jf (x) f 0(x) holds for a.e. x U. Now there remains≥ the question on the regularit≤y assumptionj j of such a mapping2 f: Again there is some rigidity in dimensions n 3: Indeed, if a mapping f satisfying (1.3) is non-constant and smooth enough (more≥ precisely, if f C k; with k = 2 for n 4 and k = 3 for n = 3), then f is a local homeomorphism.2 Furthermore, ≥ it then follows from a theorem of Zorich that such mapping f : Rn Rn is necessarily a homeomorphism, for n 3; see [47]. We would also like a!class of maps satisfying (1.3), with fixed K, to≥be closed under local uniform convergence. In order to obtain a rich enough class of mappings, it is thus necessary to weaken the regularity assumption from Ck-smoothness. See [15], [5], and [32] for recent developments regarding smoothness and branching of quasiregular mappings. The basic analytic and topological properties of quasiregular mappings are listed in the following theorem by Reshetnyak; see [39], [41]. Theorem 1.2 (Reshetnyak's theorem). Let U Rn be a domain and let f : U ⊂ ! Rn be quasiregular. Then (1) f is differentiable a.e. and (2) f is either constant or it is discrete, open, and sense-preserving. Recall that a map g : X Y between topological spaces X and Y is discrete 1 ! if the preimage g− (y) of every y Y is a discrete subset of X and that g is open if gU is open for every open U 2X: We also remark that a continuous discrete and open map g : X Y is called⊂ a branched covering. ! To say that f : U Rn is sense-preserving means that the local degree ! µ(y; f; D) is positive for all domains D b U and for all y fD f@D: The local degree is an integer that tells, roughly speaking, how man2 y timesn f wraps D around y: It can be defined, for example, by using cohomology groups with compact support. For the basic properties of the local degree, we refer to [41, Proposition I.4.4]; see also [11], [35], and [45]. For example, if f is differentiable at x with J (x ) = 0; then µ(f(x ); f; D) = sign J (x ) for sufficiently small 0 f 0 6 0 f 0 72 Ilkka Holopainen and Pekka Pankka IWQCMA05 connected neighborhoods D of x0: Another useful property is the following ho- motopy invariance: If f and g are homotopic via a homotopy ht; h0 = f; h1 = g; such that y h D h @D for every t [0; 1]; then µ(y; f; D) = µ(y; g; D): 2 t n t 2 PSfrag replacements f y D f@D fD The definition of quasiregular mappings extends easily to the case of continu- ous mappings f : M N; where M and N are connected oriented Riemannian n-manifolds. ! Definition 1.3. A continuous mapping f : M N is quasiregular (or a mapping ! 1;n of bounded distortion) if it belongs to the Sobolev space Wloc (M; N) and there exists a constant K 1 such that ≥ (1.4) T f n KJ (x) for a.e. x M: j x j ≤ f 2 Here again Txf : TxM Tf(x)N is the formal differential (or the tangent map) of f at x, T f is the! operator norm of T f, and J (x) is the Jacobian j x j x f determinant of f at x uniquely defined by (f ∗volN )x = J(x; f)(volM )x almost everywhere. Note that Txf can be defined for a.e. x by using partial derivatives of local expressions of f at x. The geometric interpretation of (1.4) is that Txf maps balls of TxM either to ellipsoids with controlled ratios of the semi-axes or Txf is the constant linear map. TxM Txf Tf(x)N PSfrag replacements f M N We assume from now on that M and N are connected oriented Riemannian n-manifolds. 2. -harmonic functions A It is well-known that the composition u f of a holomorphic function f : U C ◦ ! and a harmonic function u: fU R is a harmonic function in U. In other words, holomorphic functions are harmonic! morphisms. Quasiregular mappings have a somewhat similar morphism property: If f : U Rn is quasiregular and u is an n-harmonic function in a neighborhood of fU, then! u f is a so-called -harmonic ◦ A p-Laplace operator, quasiregular mappings, and Picard-type theorems 73 function in U. In this section we introduce the notion of -harmonic functions and recall some of their basic properties that are relevant Afor this survey.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    34 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us