Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process John J. Cowan∗ HLD Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, 440 W. Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019, USA Christopher Snedeny Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 2515 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712-1205, USA James E. Lawlerz Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706-1390, USA Ani Aprahamianx and Michael Wiescher{ Department of Physics and Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Karlheinz Langanke∗∗ GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany and Institut f¨urKernphysik (Theoriezentrum), Fachbereich Physik, Technische Universit¨atDarmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße 2, 64298 Darmstadt, Germany Gabriel Mart´ınez-Pinedoyy GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; Institut f¨urKernphysik (Theoriezentrum), Fachbereich Physik, Technische Universit¨atDarmstadt, Schlossgartenstraße 2, 64298 Darmstadt, Germany; and Helmholtz Forschungsakademie Hessen f¨urFAIR, GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Friedrich-Karl Thielemannzz Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland and GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany (Dated: February 2, 2021) The production of about half of the heavy elements found in nature is assigned to a spe- cific astrophysical nucleosynthesis process: the rapid neutron capture process (r-process). Although this idea has been postulated more than six decades ago, the full understand- ing faces two types of uncertainties/open questions: (a) The nucleosynthesis path in the nuclear chart runs close to the neutron-drip line, where presently only limited experi- arXiv:1901.01410v3 [astro-ph.HE] 1 Feb 2021 mental information is available, and one has to rely strongly on theoretical predictions for nuclear properties. (b) While for many years the occurrence of the r-process has been associated with supernovae, where the innermost ejecta close to the central neutron star were supposed to be neutron-rich, more recent studies have cast substantial doubts on this environment. Possibly only a weak r-process, with no or negligible production of the third r-process peak, can be accounted for, while much more neutron-rich conditions, including an r-process path with fission-cycling, are likely responsible for the majority of the heavy r-process elements. Such conditions could result during the ejection of initially highly neutron-rich matter, as found in neutron stars, or during the fast ejec- tion of matter which has prior experienced strong electron-captures at high densities. Possible scenarios are the mergers of neutron stars, neutron-star black hole mergers, but include also rare classes of supernovae as well as hypernovae/collapsars with polar jet ejecta and possibly also accretion disk outflows related to the collapse of fast rotating massive stars. The composition of the ejecta from each event determines the temporal evolution of the r-process abundances during the \chemical" evolution of the Galaxy. 2 Stellar r-process abundance observations, have provided insights into, and constraints on the frequency of and conditions in the responsible stellar production sites. One of them, neutron star mergers, was just identified thanks to the observation of the r-process kilonova electromagnetic transient following the Gravitational Wave event GW170817. These observations, increasingly more precise due to improved experimental atomic data and high resolution observations, have been particularly important in defining the heavy element abundance patterns of the old halo stars, and thus determining the extent, and nature, of the earliest nucleosynthesis in our Galaxy. Combining new results and impor- tant breakthroughs in the related nuclear, atomic and astronomical fields of science, this review attempts to provide an answer to the question \How Were the Elements from Iron to Uranium Made?" CONTENTS D. Fission 35 I. Introduction and historical reviews2 VI. Astrophysical Sites and their ejecta composition 36 A. Possible r-process sites related to massive stars 37 II. Observations5 1. Neutrino winds from core-collapse supernovae 37 A. Stellar Abundances of Neutron-Capture Elements in 2. Electron-capture supernovae 39 Metal-Poor Stars5 3. Neutrino-induced r-process in the He-shell 39 B. Atomic Data for the Analysis of neutron-capture 4. Quark deconfinement supernovae 39 Elements in Metal-Poor Stars7 5. Magneto-rotational supernovae with jets 40 C. Abundance Trends in Galactic and Extragalactic 6. Collapsars, Hypernovae, long-duration Stars9 Gamma-Ray Bursts 41 D. The role of long-lived radioactive species 11 B. Neutron-star and neutron-star / black hole mergers 43 E. Kilonova observations 12 1. Dynamic ejecta 46 2. Neutrino Winds and the Effect of Neutrinos 48 III. Basic Working of the r-process and necessary 3. Accretion Disks outflows 49 environment conditions 14 A. Modeling Composition Changes in Astrophysical VII. Electromagnetic signatures of r-process nucleosynthesis 50 Plasmas 14 B. Special features of the r-process and the role of VIII. Abundance evolution in the Galaxy and Origin of the neutron densities and temperatures 16 r-process 54 C. How to obtain the required neutron-to-seed ratios 21 A. Supernova vs. r-process imprints in early galactic evolution 54 IV. Experimental developments for r-process studies 22 B. Galactic Chemical Evolution Modelling 57 A. Production of neutron-rich isotopes 23 1. Homogeneous evolution models 57 1. Nuclear reactors and fission product sources 24 2. Inhomogeneous galactic chemical evolution 58 2. Spallation sources and ISOL techniques 24 C. Connecting observational constraints on r-process 3. Fragmentation sources 24 abundances with different astrophysical sites 59 B. Experimental Achievements in Measuring Nuclear D. Long-lived Radioactivities: r-process Properties 25 cosmochronometers and actinide boost stars 61 1. The experimental study of nuclear masses 26 Mass measurements in storage rings 26 IX. Final remarks and conclusions 64 Mass measurements in traps 26 2. Beta-Decay Studies 27 Acknowledgments 68 3. Beta-delayed neutron emission probability measurements 27 References 68 C. Experiments towards Neutron Capture Rates 28 1. Neutron Capture on neutron-rich nuclei: β-Oslo method 29 I. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL REVIEWS 2. Neutron capture by (d; p) surrogate reactions 29 3. Neutron-capture in ring experiments 30 At present we know of 118 elements from charge num- V. Nuclear modeling of r-process input 30 ber Z = 1 (H) to Z = 118 (Og). Eighty of them have at A. Nuclear masses 30 least one stable isotope (up to Z = 82, Pb) with Z = 43 B. Beta-decay half-lives 32 Z C. Neutron captures 34 (Tc) and = 61 (Pm) being unstable. Another 11 ele- ments up to Z = 94 (Pu) [with the exception of Z = 93, Np] are naturally occurring on earth with sufficiently long half-lives, while the remaining ones with short half-lives ∗ [email protected] have only been either produced in laboratory or possibly y [email protected] also astrophysical environments. The question of how z [email protected] this took place in the Universe is a long-standing one. x [email protected] { Presently we know that of the natural elements/isotopes [email protected] 1;2 3;4 7 ∗∗ [email protected] only H, He and Li originate in the Big Bang, with yy [email protected] problems remaining in understanding the abundance of zz [email protected] 7Li (Cyburt et al., 2016; Pitrou et al., 2018). All other 3 elements were synthesized in stars, the first ones form- He, Li and their isotopes 1;2H, 3;4He and 7Li, given in ing a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. The yellow), plus stellar sources, contributing via winds and majority of stars, which have long evolutionary phases, explosions to the interstellar medium until the formation are powered by fusion reactions. Major concepts for stel- of the solar system. These stellar burning abundances re- lar burning were laid out in the 1950s (Burbidge et al., sult from charged-particle reactions up to the Fe-group in 1957; Cameron, 1957), including the then called x-process stellar evolution and explosions (green), and neutron cap- which today is understood via spallation of nuclei by cos- ture processes. The latter are a superposition of (under- mic rays (e.g. Prantzos, 2012). During their evolution, stood) slow neutron captures (s-process) in helium burn- and in explosive end phases, massive stars can synthesize ing of stars (with abundance maxima at closed neutron elements from C through Ti, the iron-peak elements (e.g., shells for stable nuclei, turquoise), and a rapid neutron 21 Z 30 from Sc to Zn) and beyond, (as outlined over capture process (r-process, pink) leading to abundance many≤ years,≤ e.g. Howard et al., 1972; Woosley and Heger, maxima shifted to lighter nuclei in comparison to the s- 2007; Wanajo et al., 2018; Curtis et al., 2019). The major process. We note, however, that the contributions of the result is, however, that the production of heavier nuclei i, p, ν, and νp-processes are minor and thus are not read- up to Pb, Bi, and the actinides requires free neutrons, ily apparent in this figure. The focus of this review will as charged-particle reactions in stellar evolution and ex- be on the r-process and the understanding of how the plosions lead typically to full chemical or quasi equilib- corresponding isotopes were synthesized in nature. ria which favor the abundance of nuclei with the highest nuclear binding energies, occurring in the Fe-peak (Hix H Stellar burning ) 10 et al., 2007). 6 10 He A (very) small number of these heavy isotopes can 8 10 O be produced as a result of charged-particle and photon- C Ne induced reactions in explosive nucleosynthesis, the so 106 SiS Fe D s−process peak r−process peak s−process peak r−process peak s−process peak called (proton-rich) p-process (e.g.