ITER Aims and Technical Challenges

ITER Aims and Technical Challenges

I and I I - ITER Aims and Technical Challenges Jo Lister CRPP-EPFL Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Switzerland Outline of the first 2 talks q A previous lecture series was given by Prof. Ambrogio Fasoli q These introduced fusion and ITER but concentrated on the physics q Today and tomorrow we revisit the basic aims and design of ITER, but try to extract the technical challenges, and more importantly, where these challenges come from Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 2 Remember why we are doing this ! q Finite oil resource thinking was launched by Hubbert in 1956 when he predicted US oil production would peak around 1970 - no-one listened q It did - he was right - US production was allowed at 100% capacity q Now domestic production is decreasing q Idem for world oil, idem for gas Provide a long term energy supply Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 3 We don’t have a solution for demand exceeding production ! q Swenson’s Law says: “ To avoid deprivation resulting from the exhaustion of non-renewable resources, humanity must employ conservation and renewable resource substitutes sufficient to match depletion.” q One reason no-one important wants to know is that oil depletion might (?) lead to war, famine, plague…. Match supply and demand Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 4 Fusion physics basics - Nuclear ?? q Where does fusion energy come from ? • The nucleus, B/A is the energy “stored” in the nucleus mass Ø So yes, it is nuclear, to a physicist, but to the public …? fusion fission (statistical) Create an acceptable energy source - waste, pollution, explosion Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 5 The “nuclear” question - Fusion : Fission comparison • Explosion ? Ø There is no fusion chain reaction Ø There is only enough fuel in the reactor for a minute of energy production Ø The worst case accident requires no population evacuation Ø The waste products do not go into the life-cycle • Proliferation ? Ø There is no risk of increasing the proliferation of atomic weapons, or other weapons of mass destruction • Fuel availability ? Ø There is enough primary fuel in water for over 109 TW-years, no transport/storage problems • Economics ? Ø Studies conclude fusion energy would be competitive at today’s prices • Feasibility ? Ø There is no known physics between now and a successful reactor Create an acceptable and truthful image of fusion Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 6 Fusion physics basics - Exothermic fusion reactions The basic fuel is deuterium, 1/6’500 in water, practically inexhaustible 1011 years D2 + D2 ® He3 (0.8 MeV) + n (2.5 MeV) D2 + D2 ® T 3 (1.0 MeV) + p (3.0 MeV) D2 + T 3 ® He 4 (3.5 MeV) + n (14.1 MeV) D2 + He3 ® He 4 (3.7 MeV) + p (14.7 MeV) Tritium is bred in situ from Lithium, equally abundant on earth Li6 + n ® He4 + T + 4.8MeV Li 7 + n ® He4 + T + n' - 2.5MeV The reaction products are : helium, neutrons, protons Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 7 Fusion physics basics - Fusion reactivity q When do fusion reactions occur ? 14.1 MeV 3.5 MeV 20 keV is 220’000’000 ºK !! q At these temperatures, all matter is in the plasma state - plasmas are forced on us ! Reach the high temperatures required - OK Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 8 Fusion physics basics - Lawson’s criterion q Lawson’s criterion, 1955-57 q based on 2 1/2 • Prad ~ Zeff n T • <s v> • t = Energy (th) / Power in qnt was only 109 s /cm3 !! q magenta line is the triple product ntT Confine the hot plasma energy for seconds Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 9 Approaches to fusion confinement q Inertial confinement (micro-bombs) - military, difficult to do, easy to finance q Cold fusion - DD reactions inside a metal lattice - “far from clear” results q Bubble fusion - DD reactions inside a deuterated liquid when the liquid cavitates with intense acoustic irradiation and neutron seeding of bubbles - the reactivity is never zero, so reactions should occur - no proposal as an energy source q Pyroelectric fusion - High local electric field accelerates nano-amps of deuterons which produce DD reactions, as expected q Straight magnetic fields - energy pours out from the ends q Toroidal magnetic fields lines - mostly the TOKAMAK Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 10 Why a tokamak ? q Electrons and ions obey Ø F = m a = q (E + v x B) Ø Confine particles with magnetic fields è magnetic confinement q Of all magnetic confinement devices, the tokamak has been the best Ø Toroidal magnetic field, like a ring Ø Electric current flows along this field inside the plasma Ø The plasma takes up the shape of a car tyre Ø Single particle trajectories are confined Understand the tokamak - OK Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 11 Basics of a tokamak q Create a circular magnetic field - a circular solenoid q Induce a current parallel with this field - a “1-turn secondary” transformer q Create magnetic fields to hold the current in an equilibrium position q Primarily an electromagnetic device Construct and operate tokamaks - OK Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 12 How fast have we progressed ? q Progress has been very rapid q 6 orders of magnitude from the first tokamak q A power plant is within sight ... but .... q Why have we progressed ? Ø Tokamaks have become bigger Ø Tokamaks have become more expensive Ø Tokamaks have bigger currents in the plasma q Extrapolation is still empirical Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 13 Where have we got to - JET q World’s largest fusion device q EU multi-national collaboration q First operated in 1983 q Energy confinement > 1 sec q Temperatures > 40 keV (400M°C) q Densities > 1020 m-3 Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 14 How do we extrapolate to ITER ? q An empirical scaling law appears to hold over 2.5 orders of magnitude in confinement time q Can we go one more step q Density of points ~ price…. Develop enough empirical knowledge to extrapolate - OK Ask whether the extrapolation is correct = ITER Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 15 What does the extrapolation lead to ? Large plasma current 15MA (7 on JET) - OK Large device (diameter 28m) - OK Large magnetic field 6T (9T on C-MOD) - OK Large equilibrium currents ~ plasma current - OK q But currents flow in the fields produced by the other currents - F = IÙB Huge static forces (MA * T ~m ) ~ 106 N/m - these are design drivers Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 16 What do we find ? q Large currents to create the high fields q Electrical power consumption if we fill the whole device with copper to make just the toroidal field Ø >>100MW(e) for 500MW(th) !!!! Large currents must be in super-conducting coils - see later Like the forces, the super-conducting currents are in crossed magnetic fields - see later q Tore Supra has super-conducting coils. q Korea, China and India are building fully super-conducting tokamaks Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 17 It gets a bit more difficult q The tokamak is a pulsed device (even if the pulse lasts up to 6,000 seconds) q All the equilibrium fields are time-varying, so the mechanical forces are time- varying q The fields across the super-conductors are time-varying The super-conducting coils will have to survive in the environment of an operating tokamak Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 18 What about the plasma itself ? q Assume we have a hot plasma, heated by 73 MW q The alpha-power is 500MW * (3.5MeV/17.6MeV) q How does this power get out ? • Core radiation, but this cools the centre • Edge radiation, not so bad • Conducted and leaves as kinetic energy q We make a magnetic divertor configuration q But this creates a large local power flux q The power flux has transient peaks too Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 19 The power at the solid surface causes erosion q What material should we use for the first wall? q Carbon/Be Ø Popular now Ø Ionises and radiates little in the core Ø Large concentrations in the core Ø Causes serious fuel dilution Ø C creates tar deposits in present devices v C + H --> CxHy Ø C will trap tritium by co-deposition in ITER v C + T/D --> CxTy v This could quickly reach the licensing limit !! Ø Not neutron resistant q Tungsten Ø No experience of a full tungsten machine - but coming Ø Radiates strongly in core, but weak concentrations Ø No co-deposition, no chemical erosion Will have to handle large power fluxes (10-20 MW/m2) - learning curve Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 20.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us