How unitary cosmology generalizes thermodynamics and solves the inflationary entropy problem Max Tegmark Dept. of Physics & MIT Kavli Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 (Dated: Physical Review D 85, 123517, submitted August 27 2011, accepted March 20 2012, published June 11) We analyze cosmology assuming unitary quantum mechanics, using a tripartite partition into system, observer and environment degrees of freedom. This generalizes the second law of thermo- dynamics to \The system's entropy can't decrease unless it interacts with the observer, and it can't increase unless it interacts with the environment." The former follows from the quantum Bayes Theorem we derive. We show that because of the long-range entanglement created by cosmological inflation, the cosmic entropy decreases exponentially rather than linearly with the number of bits of information observed, so that a given observer can reduce entropy by much more than the amount of information her brain can store. Indeed, we argue that as long as inflation has occurred in a non-negligible fraction of the volume, almost all sentient observers will find themselves in a post- inflationary low-entropy Hubble volume, and we humans have no reason to be surprised that we do so as well, which solves the so-called inflationary entropy problem. An arguably worse problem for unitary cosmology involves gamma-ray-burst constraints on the \Big Snap", a fourth cosmic dooms- day scenario alongside the \Big Crunch", \Big Chill" and \Big Rip", where an increasingly granular nature of expanding space modifies our life-supporting laws of physics. Our tripartite framework also clarifies when the popular quantum gravity approximation Gµν ≈ 8πGhTµν i is valid, and how prob- lems with recent attempts to explain dark energy as gravitational backreaction from super-horizon scale fluctuations can be understood as a failure of this approximation. I. INTRODUCTION low entropy, with its matter highly uniform rather than clumped into huge black holes. The conventional answer The spectacular progress in observational cosmology holds that inflation is an attractor solution, such that over the past decade has established cosmological infla- a broad class of initial conditions lead to essentially the tion [1{4] as the most popular theory for what happened same inflationary outcome, thus replacing the embarrass- early on. Its popularity stems from the perception that it ing need to explain extremely unusual initial conditions elegantly explains certain observed properties of our uni- by the less embarrassing need to explain why our initial verse that would otherwise constitute extremely unlikely conditions were in the broad class supporting inflation. fluke coincidences, such as why it is so flat and uniform, However, [36] argues that the entropy must have been and why there are 10−5-level density fluctuations which at least as low before inflation as after it ended, so that appear adiabatic, Gaussian, and almost scale-invariant inflation fails to make our state seem less unnatural or [5{7]. fine-tuned. This follows from the mapping between initial states and final states being invertible, corresponding to If a scientific theory predicts a certain outcome with −6 Liouville's theorem in classical mechanics and unitarity probability below 10 , say, then we say that the the- in quantum mechanics. ory is ruled out at 99.9999% confidence if we nonethe- less observe this outcome. In this sense, the classic Big Bang model without inflation is arguably ruled out at extremely high significance. For example, generic initial conditions consistent with our existence 13.7 Billion years arXiv:1108.3080v3 [hep-th] 15 Aug 2012 later predict observed cosmic background fluctuations that are about 105 times larger than we actually observe The main goal of this paper is to investigate the en- [8] | the so-called horizon problem [1]. In other words, tropy problem in unitary quantum mechanics more thor- without inflation, the initial conditions would have to be oughly. We will see that this fundamentally transforms highly fine-tuned to match our observations. the problem, strengthening the case for inflation. A sec- However, the case for inflation is not yet closed, even ondary goal is to explore other implications of unitary aside from issues to do with measurements [9], compet- cosmology, for example by clarifying when the popular ing theories [10{12] and the so-called measure problem approximation Gµν ≈ 8πGhTµν i is and is not valid. The [8, 13{33]. In particular, it has been argued that the so- rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section II, called \entropy problem" invalidates claims that inflation we describe a quantitative formalism for computing the is a successful theory. This \entropy problem" was ar- quantum state and its entropy in unitary cosmology. We ticulated by Penrose even before inflation was invented apply this formalism to the inflationary entropy problem [34], and has recently been clarified in an important body in Section III and discuss implications in Section IV. De- of work by Carroll and collaborators [35, 36]. The basic tails regarding the \Big Snap" scenario are covered to problem is to explain why our early universe had such Appendix B. 2 scopic quantum fluctuations in the various fields. 2. Because the ensuing time-evolution involves insta- bilities (such as the well-known gravitational insta- bilities that lead to the formation of cosmic large- scale structure), some of these micro-superpositions are amplified into macro-superpositions, much like in Schr¨odinger'scat example [41]. More generally, this happens for any chaotic dynamics, where pos- itive Lyapunov exponents make the outcome expo- nentially sensitive to initial conditions. 3. The current quantum state of the universe is thus a superposition of a large number of states that are macroscopically different (Earth forms here, Earth forms one meter further north, etc), as well as states that failed to inflate. 4. Since macroscopic objects inevitably interact with their surroundings, the well-known effects of deco- herence will keep observers such as us unaware of such macro-superpositions. This shows that with unitary quantum mechanics, the FIG. 1: Because of chaotic dynamics, a single early-universe conventional phrasing of the entropy problem is too quantum state j i typically evolves into a quantum superpo- simplistic, since a single pre-inflationary quantum state sition of many macroscopically different states, some of which evolves into a superposition of many different semiclas- correspond to a large semiclassical post-inflationary universe sical post-inflationary states. The careful and detailed like ours (each with its galaxies etc. in different places), and analysis of the entropy problem in [36] is mainly per- others which do not and completely lack observers. formed within the context of classical physics, and quan- tum mechanics is only briefly mentioned, when correctly stating that Liouville's theorem holds quantum mechan- II. SUBJECT, OBJECT & ENVIRONMENT ically too as long as the evolution is unitary. However, the evolution that is unitary is that of the total quan- A. Unitary Cosmology tum state of the entire universe. We unfortunately have no observational information about this total entropy, The key assumption underlying the entropy problem is and what we casually refer to as \the" entropy is instead that quantum mechanics is unitary, so we will make this the entropy we observe for our particular branch of the assumption throughout the present paper1. As described wavefunction in Figure 1. We should generally expect in [40], this suggests the history schematically illustrated these two entropies to be quite different | indeed, the in Figure 1: a wavefunction describing an early universe entropy of the entire universe may well equal zero, since quantum state (illustrated by the fuzz at the far left) if it started in a pure state, unitarity ensures that it is will evolve deterministically according to the Schr¨odinger still in a pure state. equation into a quantum superposition of not one but many macroscopically different states, some of which cor- respond to large semiclassical post-inflationary universes B. Deconstructing the universe like ours, and others which do not and completely lack observers. The argument of [40] basically went as follows: It is therefore interesting to investigate the cosmolog- ical entropy problem more thoroughly in the context of 1. By the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, any ini- unitary quantum mechanics, which we will now do. tial state must involve micro-superpositions, micro- Most discussions of quantum statistical mechanics split the Universe into two subsystems [42]: the object under consideration and everything else (referred to as the en- vironment). At a physical level, this \splitting" is simply 1 The forms of non-unitarity historically invoked to address the a matter of accounting, grouping the degrees of freedom quantum measurement problem tend to make the entropy prob- into two sets: those of the object and the rest. At a lem worse rather than better: both Copenhagen-style wavefunc- mathematical level, this corresponds to a choice of fac- tion collapse [37, 38] and proposed dynamical reduction mecha- nisms [39] arguably tend to increase the entropy, transforming torization of the Hilbert space. pure (zero entropy) quantum states into mixed states, akin to a As discussed in [43], unitary quantum mechanics can form of diffusion process in phase space. be even better understood