Feasibility of a national programme on domestic biogas in Indonesia Final report SNV Netherlands Development Organisation January 2009 This study was commissioned on request of the Directorate General for Electricity and Energy Utilisation of the Government of Indonesia by the Environment and Water Department of the Directorate General for International Development of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Royal Netherlands Embassy in Jakarta. Acknowledgement It was a pleasure to conduct this study on the feasibility of a national programme on domestic biogas in Indonesia. We received full cooperation during the interviews, field visits and consultative workshop and were amply provided with valuable information and opinions. We like to extend our gratitude to all respondents and informants for their constructive contributions and hope the results of the study will serve its purpose. The mission team is fully responsible for the views, conclusions and recommendations expressed, as well as for any errors. A special word of thanks is extended to the Royal Netherlands Embassy and Hivos/Southeast Asia in Jakarta for providing logistical and administrative support to the mission. Wim J. van Nes (team leader) Fabby Tumiwa (team member, policy and institutional expert) Ifnu Setyadi (team member, technical expert) i Executive summary This report presents the finding of a study conducted by the SNV Netherlands Development Organisation to assess the feasibility to set-up and implement a national programme on domestic biogas in Indonesia. This study was commissioned on request of the Directorate General for Electricity and Energy Utilisation (DGEEU) of the Government of Indonesia (GoI) by the Environment and Water Department (DMW) of the Directorate General for International Development (DGIS) of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Royal Netherlands Embassy (RNE) in Jakarta. A mission of three weeks in Indonesia in July 2008 was included in the study applying the following methodologies: Field visits to get an impression on the performance of biogas plants and to collect more practical information on modalities of biogas projects implemented in Indonesia so far; Interviews with informants and potential stakeholders; A half-day Workshop to present the findings of the field visits and interviews and to generate discussion among the stakeholders on a number of key-issues, and; Rating of key conditions for large-scale dissemination of biogas plants in Indonesia. A national programme on domestic biogas in Indonesia looks feasible as: Indonesia has already some history in domestic biogas with about 6,000 units constructed throughout the country so far; The technical potential for biogas amounts to minimum one million units, while there are no strong limiting social factors; The financial analysis indicates that an amount of IDR 2,000,000 as investment subsidy is generally sufficient to attract potential farmers resulting in a satisfactory financial rate of return (FIRR) of 19 percent for the farmer if firewood is replaced. The actual FIRR realized by the farmer, however, is largely dependent on the actual financial price for biomass. This underlines the need for an effective micro-credit facility. If kerosene is replaced by biogas, the FIRR amounts to 31%; Indonesia is endowed with a large number and variety of institutes, organisations and companies with a large potential to participate in the implementation of a national programme, and; There is a will and interest among (potential) stakeholders to be engaged in a national programme. The tentative outline for such a programme with a longer-term vision to develop a commercial, sustainable biogas sector includes the production of 12,000 biogas plants over a period of three years and will cost about Euro 16.6 million. The biogas farmers (57%) and DGIS through the RNE in Jakarta (43%) are the proposed financiers of the programme, while the GoI is supposed to provide policy and administrative support. The cost/benefit ratio of CDM financing still needs to be determined. It has been assumed that the GoI will fully support and own a national biogas programme and that (potential) stakeholders will agree to up-grade the quality of products and services. The current practice of fully subsidising biogas plants and the lack of commitment and/or resources to continue and expand the programme after 2011/12 are considered as risks. The following are the main recommendations resulting from the study: To RNE/Jakarta: To enter into a contract with a capable and dedicated civil society or private sector organisation (implementing agency) for the management of the fund and the coordination of the implementation of the proposed national programme; ii To the implementing agency: To undertake – as initial steps – the required assessment of the available biogas technology, to call for a national stakeholders workshop, to establish provincial biogas offices, to support the preparation of provincial plans and to mobilise effective credit providers; To DGEEU under the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) and the Directorate General of Livestock Services (DGLS) under the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA): To agree with the set-up and operation of policy coordination desks, and; To SNV: To explore internally whether advisory services could be provided to the programme, at least for the connection of Indonesia to the global knowledge base on domestic biogas. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................II TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................IV ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................VI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND....................................8 CHAPTER 2: OBJECTIVE, METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS ............9 2.1 OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS ...................................................................9 CHAPTER 3: COUNTRY BACKGROUND ...................................................... 10 3.1 AGRICULTURAL SECTOR ................................................................................11 3.2 ENERGY SECTOR ............................................................................................12 CHAPTER 4: HISTORY ON DOMESTIC BIOGAS IN INDONESIA............. 15 4.1 INSTALLATIONS AND PROJECTS ......................................................................15 4.2 TECHNICAL ASPECTS ......................................................................................17 4.2.1 Size of the plants and retention time....................................................... 19 4.2.2 Construction materials........................................................................... 20 4.2.3 Overall quality management .................................................................. 20 4.3 BENEFITS OF BIOGAS PLANTS .........................................................................20 4.4 FINANCIAL ASPECTS ......................................................................................21 4.4.1 Investment costs.....................................................................................21 4.4.2 Investment subsidy................................................................................. 21 4.5 OVERALL CONCLUSION ..................................................................................21 CHAPTER 5: POTENTIAL DEMAND FOR DOMESTIC BIOGAS ............... 22 5.1 TECHNICAL FACTORS .....................................................................................22 5.2 SOCIAL FACTORS ...........................................................................................24 5.3 WILLINGNESS AND ABILITY TO PAY ................................................................24 5.4 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................24 5.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ....................................................................................27 5.6 OVERALL CONCLUSION ..................................................................................28 CHAPTER 6: OVERVIEW OF (POTENTIAL) STAKEHOLDERS................ 29 6.1 GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS ......................................................................29 6.1.1 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources ............................................ 29 6.1.2 Ministry of Agriculture .......................................................................... 29 6.1.3 Local governments................................................................................. 30 6.2 CIVIL SECTOR ORGANISATIONS .......................................................................30 6.2.1 Institute for Rural Technology Development .......................................... 30 6.2.2 Bali Fokus ............................................................................................. 31 6.2.3 ARECOP ...............................................................................................31 iv 6.3 PRIVATE SECTOR ORGANISATIONS ..................................................................32 6.3.1 PT Gikoko Kogya Indonesia .................................................................