Cell Surface Morphology Identifies Microglia As a Distinct Class of Mononuclear Phagocyte

Cell Surface Morphology Identifies Microglia As a Distinct Class of Mononuclear Phagocyte

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1995, 15(11): 7712-7726 Cell Surface Morphology Identifies Microglia as a Distinct Class of Mononuclear Phagocyte Dana Giulian,’ Jun Li,’ Sandra Bartel,’ Jennifer Broker,’ Xia Li,’ and Joel B. Kirkpatrick* ‘Department of Neurology, ‘Baylor Center for AIDS Research, ‘Department of Pathology, and 1s2Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 To investigate differences among brain-derived microglia kines, brain injury, development, neurodegeneration, HIV- and other classes of immune cells, we compared the mor- 1, rat, human] phologies and growth properties of mononuclear phago- cytes isolated from tissues of the newborn rat. Scanning Microglia, a class of brain mononuclearphagocyte, are thought EM shows that microglia from postnatal rat brain are cov- to be the principal immune cells resident to the CNS (Giulian, ered with spines (typically >20 per cell body) in a distinc- 1992; Flaris et al., 1993). The functional capacitiesof microglia tive manner which contrasts the smooth surfaces of bone have received increasingattention as thesecells have beenfound marrow cells and the ruffled surfaces of tissue macro- to be the major sourceof brain cytokines (Giulian and Lachman, phages from spleen, liver, and peritoneum. The spine-bear- 1985; Hetier et al., 1990; Higgins and Olschowka, 1991) and ing surface of microglia is a specific cell marker, for it does have been implicated in the destruction of neuronsduring stroke not change with age or after exposure to cytokines or other (Giulian and Robertson, 1990; Giulian et al., 1993) trauma immunostimulants. Approximately 99% of mononuclear (Banati et al., 1993; Thanos et al., 1993), Alzheimer’s disease phagocytes cultured from normal adult rat brain are spi- (Bolsi, 1927; McGeer et al., 1987; Giulian et al., 1995) and HIV-l infection (Giulian et al., 1990). Primitive stem cells, nous microglia. Five days after injury to rat brain, cells at which give rise to microglia, are first seenin the periventricular sites of Wallerian degeneration are essentially all spinous regionsduring early embryonic developmentand eventually take ones while nearly 30% of cells found within areas of in- up residence throughout the fetal brain (Rio-Hortega, 1932; farction or penetrating trauma are invading macrophages. Ling, 1981). In the late fetal and early neonatal periods, matur- In a similar way, nearly all cells isolated from normal, post- ing microglia differentiate from the ameboidinto ramified forms, mortem adult human brain are spine-bearing microglia characteristic of the quiescent cells found in the adult nervous (>99% homogeneity). Brains from patients with amyotro- system (Rio-Hortega, 1932). phic lateral sclerosis contain only spinous microglia Although many investigators accept the hypothesis that stem whereas cells from HIV-1 infected brains include significant cells common to all classesof mononuclearphagocytes give rise numbers of invading ruffled. macrophages. to microglia in early stagesof development (Rio-Hortega, 1932; Cultured microglia, unlike cultured bone marrow precur- Ling and Wong, 1993), there is less agreementas to the rela- sors, monocytes, or tissue macrophages, spontaneously tionships among microglia and other classesof mononuclear develop long, thin processes that extend hundreds of mi- phagocytes after birth (Imamoto and Leblond, 1977). During crons in length. Microglia retract these processes after ex- CNS pathology, microglia have been describedeither as a dis- posure to fetal bovine serum, laminin, or such immuno- tinct cell population (Hickey and Kimura, 1988) or, alternatively, stimulants as recombinant murine interferon y (rmlFNy) as a wave of invading blood monocytes (Perry et al., 1985; and lipopolysaccharide. Of all types of mononuclear phag- Jordan and Thomas, 1988). Part of this controversy arisesfrom ocytes tested, only microglia differentiate into quiescent the fact that cell markersexpressed in developing microglia are ramified cells when in contact with astrocytes. Thus, mi- often difficult to detect in mature, ramified cells (Perry et al., croglia represent a unique class of cell maintained, in part, 1993). For example, nonspecificesterase, which is expressedby by astroglia as dormant, ramified mononuclear phagocytes peripheral mononuclearphagocytes throughout development, is in mature CNS. Application of cell surface criteria de- normally only seenin microglia during fetal and early postnatal scribed here will allow study of distinct populations of development(Giulian and Baker, 1986). Becausenonspecific es- mononuclear phagocytes associated with neurologic dis- terase(+) cells exist within the newborn rat brain, Ling et al orders. (1982) concluded that blood cells invade the postnatal brain, [Key words: microglia, macrophages, monocytes, cyfo- while other investigators finding no macrophagicmakers in ma- ture brain came to an opposing conclusion (Wood et al., 1976; Oehmichen, 1983). In general, efforts to establish a panel of Received June 9, 1995; revised July 24, 1995; accepted July 31, 1995. microglia-specific markers have proved elusive, with expression The work was supported by NIH Grants NS25637, NS23 113, and MH48652, The Vivian Smith Foundation, Alzheimer’s Association, and Baylor’s Alzhei- dependentupon age, speciesand prior exposure to immunosti- mu’s Disease Research Center. mulants(Giulian, 1992; Flaris et al., 1993; Ulvestad et al., 1994). Correspondence should be addressed to Dana Giulian, M.D., Ph.D., Depart- Despite the uncertaintiesassociated with histochemicalmarkers, ment of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. observations basedupon other techniques suggestmicroglia to Copyright 0 1995 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/95/157712-15$05.00/O be a distinct classof cell. Unlike differentiated blood monocytes, The Journal of Neuroscience, November 1995, 15(11) 7713 microglia may proliferate in postnatal and adult brain (Graeber A et al., 1988; Giulian et al., 1989), suggesting features of stem cells found in bone marrow. Patch clamp study of membrane EOOr conductances (Kettenmann et al., 1990) demonstrates inward di- rected rectifying potassium currents for microglia which are not found in monocytes or macrophages. Moreover, Hickey and Ki- mura (1988) note that parenchymal microglia of adult chimeric rats do not arise from marrow-derived stem cells or blood-borne monocytes. In this report, we compare brain-derived mononuclear phag- ocytes recovered from newborn rat with other classes of mono- nuclear phagocytes isolated from newborn blood, spleen, liver, marrow, and peritoneum. We find that cultured microglia display Days In Culture distinctive features including surface morphology, patterns of - Microglia differentiation, and responsiveness to cytokines. Moreover, scan- ning EM distinguishes microglia from invading blood-borne IZi Liver macrophages at sites of adult brain injury. Although astrocyte B IS8 Spleen contacts with microglia accelerate differentiation of ameboid cells into quiescent ramified ones, astroglia do not shape the 0 Marrow behaviors of other classes of mononuclear phagocytes. Further, study of human brain cells indicate scanning EM to be a useful m Blood technique to characterize inflammation associated with neuro- ETEJ Peritoneum logical disease. Materials and Methods Isolation and identijkation of cells. Mononuclear phagocytes were iden- tified by their ability to engulf fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (0.7 pm, Covaspheres Particles, FX Green, Duke Scientific, Palo Alto, CA), by the presence of scavenger receptors (Giulian and Baker, 1985; Giu- lian et al., 1989) visualized with the fluorescent probe 1,l ‘-dioctadecyl- 1,3,3,3’,3-tetramethyl-indo-carbocyanine bound to acetylated low den- Figure I. A, Proliferation of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from sity lipoprotein (DiI-ac-LDL; obtained from Biomedical Technologies different tissues of newborn rat. When placed in chemically defined Inc., Stoughton, MA), by the presence of nonspecific esterase activity culture media free of serum, only cells isolated from brain showed spon- (Koski et al., 1981), and by immunostaining with the OX-42 antibody taneous proliferation. B, Mean frequency of process bearing cells for (Serotec, Kidlington, England) at 30 p,g/mK Astroglia were identified classes of mononuclear phagocytes was scored with a process defined bv immuno-labeling for glial fibrillarv acidic orotein (GFAP) usine rab- as >3-fold cell body diameter. As shown, about 25% microglia under- bit anti-bovine GFLP (Dako, Glostmp, Denmark) at 40 &ml & de- scribed previously (Giulian et al., 1986). went ramification by 3 d in vitro. Mononuclear phagocytes were isolated directly from various organs of rat following enzymatic/mechanical dissociation of tissues, separation by a ficol/sodium diatrizoate gradient (Histopaque 1077; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and selective adhesion to glass or plastic (Giulian and 35% sucrose and separated by a ficol/sodium diatrizoate gradient (His- Baker, 1986). All cells were grown on glass coverslips in chemically tooaaue 1077: Sigma. St. Louis. MO). Cells were nlaced in N2 media defined N2 medium (Bottenstein and Sato, 1979) free of serum. Brain, containing gentamycin (48 kg/ml) and recovered by selective adhesion liver, and spleen were mechanically dissociated in the presence of 0.2% to plastic for 12 hr (Giulian and Baker, 1986). We typically recover l- trypsin (T-2904, Sigma) plus 0.2 mg/ml of DNase (D-5025, Sigma) for

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us