Fairness Criteria Voting Methods

Fairness Criteria Voting Methods

VOTING METHODS FAIRNESS CRITERIA Majority Criterion – If a candidate wins by a Majority – receiving more than half of the first majority, then that candidate should win the place votes election by another method. Evaluation – If the majority winner does not win by another Plurality Method – receiving the most first place method, then this criterion is violated. If votes majority winner does win by another method, then it is not violated. Plurality with Elimination – Check first place votes for a majority. If candidate has a majority, then Head-to-head Criterion – If a candidate wins by declared winner. If not, eliminate the candidate head-to-head (pairwise) over every other with the fewest first place votes and recount. candidate, then that candidate should win the Recount. Continue until a candidate wins by a election. Evaluation – If one candidate wins over majority. all others when paired up and does not win by another method, then the criterion is violated. If Borda Count Method – Voters rank candidates on by another method, the head-to-head winner ballot. Assign 1 point to last place, 2 points to next, still wins, then the criterion is not violated. etc. Total points for each candidate. Candidate with the most points wins. Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion – A candidate wins. In a recount the only changes are that one Pairwise Comparison (Head-to-Head) Method – or more of the candidates are removed. Original Voters rank candidates on ballot. Pair up winner should win. Evaluation – A candidate candidates so each is compared with every other. drops out. Look at the 1st place votes. If another Column by column see who is closer to the top. candidate wins, then it is violated. If original That candidate gets those votes. A T-table is good winner still wins, then the criterion is not for this. The candidate who wins in the pair gets 1 violated. point. If a tie, then each gets ½ point. Candidate with the most points is the winner. Monotonicity Criterion – A candidate wins a straw vote. Voter preference changes before the Finding the number of Comparisons (C) to be actual election only favor the winner; the winner should still win the election. Evaluation – Straw made between (n) candidates, when using the vote and election winner different, it is violated. Pairwise Comparison (or Head-to-Head) Method Straw vote and election winner the same, it is 푛(푛 − 1) not violated. 퐶 = 2 Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem – No voting method will satisfy all four fairness criteria. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us