Emoia Impar and Emoia Cyanura)

Emoia Impar and Emoia Cyanura)

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902866; this version posted January 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. SIZE-BASED DOMINANCE HIERARCHY IN ONE OF TWO SYMPATRIC CRYPTIC PACIFIC SKINKS (EMOIA IMPAR AND EMOIA CYANURA) MARY “MOLLY” HALLSTEN Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. Emoia impar and Emoia cyanura are two morphologically cryptic Pacific skinks that have different preferred thermal micro-habitats but similar geographic range and overlap. Previously individuals have been noted to display a size-based dominance hierarchy at favored basking sites, though this behavior was not specified between species. I found that only one of the two species, E. impar, naturally presents this size-based dominance hierarchy in areas of high population density. Neither species exhibit the hierarchy in low population density areas. No evidence was found to suggest that the presence of this hierarchy allows one species to exclude the other. Key words: skinks; Emoia; thermal resource partitioning; Moorea, French Polynesia; size- based dominance hierarchy INTRODUCTION Understanding how multiple species co- exist within a shared habitat is a fundamental challenge in ecology (Gause 1934). Hardin (1960) documented the competitive exclusion principle, which states that if two non- interbreeding populations occupy the same ecological niche and geographical territory, and differ in their rate of resource consumption, one species will eventually drive the other to extinction. Therefore, for two species to co-exist, there must be some difference in either behavior or exploitation of resources. An aspect of co-existence is resource partitioning, where two species differ in the use of a resource within the same fundamental niche (Vandermeer 1974). In ectotherms, one aspect of niche partitioning may come in the form of thermal regulation and physiological FIG. 1. Map, Mo’orea, French differences (Gunderson et al. 2018). Polynesia showing location of study sites Thermal regulation and the availability of (Table 1A in Appendix) favored basking sites can create competition between individuals (Lewis et al. 2000). For determines their position in the hierarchy. Less example, Lewis (2000) notes the presence of is known about naturally occurring dominance size-based dominance hierarchies in a species hierarchies, particularly amongst members of of whiptail, Pholidoscelis exsul, where the males the family Scincidae. exhibit aggressive interactions when they Emoia impar and Emoia cyanura are two compete for basking and foraging sites in an morphologically cryptic skink species located experimental setting. Dominance hierarchies throughout much of Oceania, from the may be expected to occur in habitats of high Solomon Islands to French Polynesia and population density due to an increased Micronesia with broad range overlap (Zug frequency of aggressive interactions (Alberts 2013). Bruna et al. (1996) determined the two 1994; Brattstrom 1974; Toft 1985). Brattstrom species to be morphologically convergent but (1974) claimed that reptilian hierarchies are not sister taxa, and that they co-existed in all often a result of experimentally crowded habitats studied. They partition micro-habitats territorial species, where an individual’s size by thermal preference, with E. cyanura bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902866; this version posted January 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. preferring open canopy cover, a higher body basking hierarchies result in one species temperature, and warmer substrates than E. excluding the other from shared habitat. I impar (McElroy 2014). hypothesize that this size-based dominance The behavioral differences that allow for E. hierarchy is present in both species and allows impar and E. cyanura to coexist is not yet fully for individuals to exclude members of the understood. A diet study on the island of opposite species. I also hypothesize that this Mo’orea by Erica Garcia (1997) observed E. behavior will be present only in densely impar consuming four prey categories that E. populated sites where competition is greatest. cyanura did not, but the study did not indicate that foraging or diet significantly impacts the MATERIALS AND METHODS distribution of either species. Other than diet, a thermal or behavioral distinction should be Study sites considered. Zug (1991) recorded that E. impar and E. cyanura are behaviorally similar. Zug This study was conducted on the island of also noted that when frightened away, skinks Mo’orea, French Polynesia throughout the of both species would recolonize sunlit areas Opunohu Valley, including and along the with the smallest individuals appearing first, Three Coconuts Trail (Fig. 1). Sites were followed by the successive displacement of selected if four or more skinks were initially smaller individuals by increasingly larger ones. observed regardless of species. These observations suggest the presence of a dominance hierarchy, but Zug did not Field experiment differentiate between species to note if this was intraspecific competition or interspecific To explore this naturally occurring basking exclusion from optimal sunning sites. hierarchy, I conducted a field experiment. After Both E. impar and E. cyanura are frequently locating a site with at least four skinks, I chased and easily observed on the island of Mo’orea, the skinks away and started a 10-minute timer. French Polynesia, suggesting that both are Photographs, time of re-appearance, order of abundant. Given the high number of skinks re-appearance, and basking substrate were seen with preliminary observations, the recorded for each individual that recolonized abundance of these two Emoia skinks on the site within the 10-minute period. Order of Mo’orea is part of what makes the island a re-appearance is analogous with order in model system to study their interactions. On hierarchy for all graphs and analysis. After the islands of Fiji, the micro-habitat of E. cyanura 10-minutes, basking substrate dimensions tends to overlap with other species beyond E. were taken to serve as scales in the impar, such as Gehyra oceanica, photographs. I imported the photos to the Hemiphyllodactylus typus, Lepidodactylus program ImageJ (Schneider et al. 2012), where lugubris, Nactus pelagicus, Cryptoblepharus I measured the length of each skink from snout eximius, Emoia concolor, Emoia nigra, Emoia to vent relative to the scale bar in each trossula, Lipinia noctua, and Leiolopisma alazon photograph. All photographs were taken with (Zug 1991). In contrast, the island of Mo’orea is a Nikon Coolpix P500. A total number of skinks home to only four species of skinks: Lipinia seen before, during, and after the observation noctua, Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus, Emoia period was taken. impar, and Emoia cyanura, with the Emoia skinks being the two most observable and the two Identifying species with the closest observed overlapping distributions. Mo’orea is an ideal island to Species of each individual was determined observe interactions between these two Emoia based on the following three characteristics: (1) species with minimal interference from other blue or green tail coloration, (2) absence or herpetofauna. presence of parietal eye, and (3) if the mid- A study of E. impar and E. cyanura was dorsal scales fused into larger single scales (E. undertaken to investigate behavioral impar) or remained unfused (E. cyanura). interactions between individuals at basking (Ineich and Zug 1991). Photographs and sites in varying habitats on the island of binoculars were used to closely examine every Mo’orea, and how these interactions relate to individual to ensure correct identification. their co-existence. This study aims to examine Photographs were also closely examined possible hierarchies present between during data analysis to ensure one individual individuals of the same species as well as was not counted more than once per site. between species, while also investigating if bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.11.902866; this version posted January 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Identification guides are available in the Low High Appendix (Figures 5A, 6A). 2a 2b Sites variation After each observational period, ten thermal measurements of the varying sunning substrates were taken with an Infrared Thermometer [Fischer Scientific] and averaged. One quadrat varying between 2x2 or 3x3 meters was taken at each site and the following measurements were recorded in percentages of 2c cover: sunlight, wood, shrubs, soil, rocks, and leaf litter. Percent of canopy cover was recorded at each site using the iPhone application “Percentage Cover” (Public Interest Enterprises 2017). Number of trees were recorded, with a tree being categorized as any woody plant over one meter in height within the quadrat. GPS coordinates and elevation were

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us