Volume 21 Number 2 Article 53 Winter 10-15-1996 Tolkien, Sayers, Sex and Gender David Doughan Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Doughan, David (1996) "Tolkien, Sayers, Sex and Gender," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 21 : No. 2 , Article 53. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol21/iss2/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Tolkien’s expressed “loathing” for Dorothy Sayers and her novels Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon is remarkable considering that Sayers is generally considered to belong to the same milieu as the Inklings. Possible reasons for this are the contrast between the orthodox Catholic Tolkien’s view of male sexuality as inherently sinful, requiring “great mortification”, and Sayers’s frankly hedonistic approach. Another reason may be Sayers’s depiction of an independent Oxford women’s college getting by successfully without men, and her representation of marriage as a source of intellectual frustration for creative women. Additional Keywords Gender; Oxford; Dorothy L. Sayers; Sex; Sin This article is available in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol21/iss2/53 Tolkien, Sayers, Sex and Gender David Doughan Abstract: Tolkien’s expressed “loathing” for Dorothy Sayers and her novels Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon is remarkable considering that Sayers is generally considered to belong to the same milieu as the Inklings. Possible reasons for this are the contrast between the orthodox Catholic Tolkien’s view of male sexuality as inherently sinful, requiring “great mortification”, and Sayers’s frankly hedonistic approach. Another reason may be Sayers’s depiction of an independent Oxford women’s college getting by successfully without men, and her representation of marriage as a source of intellectual frustration for creative women. Keywords: Gender, Oxford, Dorothy L. Sayers, Sex, Sin I could not stand Gaudy Night. I followed P. Wimsey wary attitude towards Williams might suggest a certain from his attractive beginnings so far, by which time I mistrust of his associates. However, not only does this not conceived a loathing for him (and his creatrix) not explain the strength of Tolkien’s objection, but it does not surpassed by any other character in literature known to take into account the fact that it was inspired by two in me, unless by his Harriet. The honeymoon one particular of the Wimsey books. (Busman’s H.?) was worse. I was sick . Lord Peter Wimsey is a preposterous creation, even by the (Tolkien, 1981, p. 82, letter no. 71) standards of romantic crime fiction. Sayers, who mainly Dorothy Leigh Sayers is occasionally referred to as being a earned her living from him, created him with a shrewd sort of honorary Inkling1. She certainly was in frequent calculation of the qualities that a gentleman sleuth should correspondence with both C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams, possess. He is in a position to work closely with the police: and the writings of the latter especially influenced her to Inspector Charles Parker is not only a personal friend, but begin her translation of Dante’s Commedia. So such an eventually marries Wimsey’s sister. In detective stories expression of distaste by a potential sympathiser is somewhat generally, the tedious business of calling in expert opinions remarkable. The reasons for this have never been explicitly in support of plot details can hold up the narrative; therefore, stated, but certain marked differences of style and emphasis to obviate the necessity of involving outsiders, Wimsey is (to say nothing of taste) have already been pointed out (Vink, made to be a gifted amateur criminologist. He also speaks 1990, p. 43) - Sayers’s Anglicanism, her French studies, her half-a-dozen languages fluently, is an expert bibliophile, a involvement in and writing of drama, and her enthusiasm for virtuoso pianist, a brilliant cricketer, a fin gourmet and a Dante. However, none of this applies directly to the above connoisseur of wine, women and song. His wealth and quotation, which is concerned with Sayers’s popular leisure enable him to drop everything in order to dash round detective fiction featuring Lord Peter Wimsey, and especially the world, if need be, in search of a vital piece of evidence. the two novels Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon. He speaks with kings, yet, when necessary, has the common Tolkien was certainly far from averse to what is nowadays touch, is highly proficient at physical combat, and has a known as “genre” fiction, such as science fiction and crime shining war record. In short, “he was to show from the stories, and initially he obviously found Wimsey an beginning what God could have done if only He’d had the appealing character. What might have changed his view? money” (Heilbrun in Sandoe 1972, p. 462). Personal antipathy can probably be ruled out, since Tolkien Sayers’s relationship with her money-spinning hero is and Sayers most likely never met, at least in the belief of somewhat ambivalent. She certainly referred to the Wimsey C.S. Lewis (1988, p. 481). Lewis himself knew and novels as mere potboilers, and when she seemed to have corresponded with her in a fairly friendly fashion, though he earned enough from Lord Peter to concentrate on other too disliked Gaudy Night (Carpenter, 1978, p. 189). As matters, she prepared to marry him off — which is why he so already mentioned, her acquaintanceship and correspondence unaccountably falls for Harriet Vane in Strong Poison. with Charles Williams was far more extensive. They shared However, at this point she suffered a severe financial a similarity of outlook in many ways; indeed, parts of Murder downturn, which meant that the Wimsey hymenaeals would must advertise (the least “realistic” of the Wimsey novels) have to be postponed until his author had seen off the almost read like a Williams story. Thus, Tolkien’s distinctly creditors. As already indicated, Lord Peter does indeed have For one example out of many, see Brabazon, 1981, p. 235. TOLKIEN, SAYERS, SEX AND GENDER 357 many hallmarks of a cynical commercial formulation; also, which she found: he is to a large extent a conscious parody, with something of to consist in the presence of Three Grand Wodehouse’s Bertie Wooster (comparisons between their Assumptions . : respective impeccable menservants are illuminating), but 1. That the primary aim and object of Bed is that a rather more of Max Beerbohm’s Duke of Dorset in Zuleika good time should be had by all. Dobson. However, this is by no means all there is to him. 2. That (other things being equal) it is the business One of the qualities for which Sayers consciously strove was of the Male to make it so. that his character should be capable of development; “this 3. That he knows his business. she certainly accomplished even if the change from the The first Assumption rules out at once all . sadists, Wooster-like, monocled, man-about-Town of Whose body? connoisseurs in rape, egotists, and superstitious to the sensitive guilt-oppressed scholar sobbing in his wife’s believers in female reluctance, as well as Catholic lap at the end of Busman’s honeymoon is less a development (replenish-the-earth) utilitarians and stockbreeders. than a metamorphosis” (James in Brabazon, 1981, p. xiv) — The second Assumption rules out the hasty, the though even as early as Whose body? he is already consulting clumsy [. .], the untimely and (in most cases) the psychiatrists about war-generated neuroses. Certainly over routinier — though one would not wish to be too hard on the years he becomes less of a two-dimensional parody and Mr. Shandy, senior, since Mrs. Shandy may have been more of a wish-fulfilment fantasy of his creatrix’s ideal man as orderly-minded as himself and possibly preferred it — and lover. that way — and those . who are without skill in the Of course, this could be one reason for Tolkien’s growing management of bed-furniture or wind the whole aversion. Wimsey’s increasingly un-“masculine” and often combination into toppling and insecure complications neurotic sensitivity might well have tried the patience of one of pillows and blankets or (in extreme circumstances) who had actually been through the War, and caused him to bang their partner’s head against the wall . wonder ever more testily, for example, why one who was so (Letter of 18.10.1944 to Charles Williams, quoted in riven by guilt over the death penalty should be so zealous in Brabazon, 1981, p .112) seeking out candidates for it. Still, this by itself would hardly This view of male sexuality is a very long way indeed from explain the strength of his reaction — and other more likely “great mortification”, which is not a concept which ever explanations are not far to seek; for example, in Tolkien’s seems to have occurred to Lord Peter.