S/PV.8790 International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals 08/06/2021

S/PV.8790 International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals 08/06/2021

United Nations S/ PV.8790 Security Council Provisional Seventy-sixth year 8790th meeting Tuesday, 8 June 2021, 3 p.m. New York President: Mr. Jürgenson/Mr. Auväärt (Estonia) Members: China ......................................... Mr. Geng Shuang France ........................................ Mrs. Dime Labille India ......................................... Mr. Raguttahalli Ireland ........................................ Ms. Byrne Nason Kenya. Mr. Kiboino Mexico ........................................ Mrs. Buenrostro Massieu Niger ......................................... Mr. Aougi Norway ....................................... Ms. Heimerback Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Kuzmin Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ................... Ms. King Tunisia ........................................ Mr. Ladeb United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Mr. Woodroffe United States of America .......................... Mr. DeLaurentis Viet Nam ...................................... Mr. Dang Agenda International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-0506 ([email protected]). Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org). 21-14423 (E) *2114423* S/PV.8790 International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals 08/06/2021 The meeting was called to order at 3.05 p.m. hostage-taking as violations of the laws or customs of war. The Appeals Chamber also dismissed the Adoption of the agenda Prosecution’s appeal and affirmed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Mr. Mladić is not guilty of genocide in The agenda was adopted. relation to crimes committed in certain municipalities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Appeals Chamber International Residual Mechanism for Criminal affirmed Mr. Mladić’s sentence of life imprisonment. Tribunals I invite Council members to read the Judgment, which The President: In accordance with rule 37 of the includes both the majority position and dissenting Council’s provisional rules of procedure, I invite the opinions and is already publicly available on the representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Mechanism’s website. Rwanda and Serbia to participate in this meeting. On this occasion, I wish to thank the judges of the On behalf of the Council, I welcome His Excellency bench as well as the assigned Chambers team for their Mr. Aleksandar Vučić, President of the Republic of tireless efforts to ensure that any delays in the conduct Serbia. of the case and the delivery of the judgment were kept to a minimum. This was a remarkable achievement, given In accordance with rule 39 of the Council’s that the appeal process was complex from the beginning. provisional rules of procedure, I invite the following I recall that issues pertaining to the disqualification briefers to participate in this meeting: Judge Carmel of judges on the bench had to be addressed early on Agius, President of the International Residual in the proceedings and that the health situation of Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, and Mr. Serge Mr. Mladić required the postponement of the appeal Brammertz, Prosecutor of the International Residual hearing originally scheduled for March 2020. Then Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. the coronavirus disease pandemic struck, and travel The Security Council will now begin its restrictions and social-distancing requirements caused consideration of the item on its agenda. progress to be further impeded. Finally, we had the unexpected and tragic passing of a member of the I wish to draw the attention of the Council bench — in this case, Judge Gberdao Gustave Kam, members to document S/2021/487, which contains of Burkina Faso — in February of this year. The the text of a letter dated 17 May 2021 from the Mechanism — and I personally — still deeply mourn President of the International Residual Mechanism for his loss. Criminal Tribunals addressed to the President of the Security Council. I take this opportunity to honour Judge Kam and his impressive contributions to international justice. He I now give the floor to Judge Agius. was not only an excellent judge with a brilliant legal Judge Agius: It is my great pleasure to brief mind, but also a kind and enthusiastic colleague who the Security Council once again on the progress of was valued and respected by his fellow judges and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal staff alike. At this sad moment, the Mechanism was Tribunals in the implementation of its mandate and fortunate that Judge Mustapha El Baaj of Morocco to do so under the presidency of Estonia. Estonia agreed to be appointed to the Bench at short notice in has a distinguished record of supporting the rule of Judge Kam’s place. I sincerely commend Judge El Baaj law — and the Mechanism in particular — and I wish it for taking on the substantial responsibilities involved every success during its presidency. in joining this case at a later stage. Thanks to his diligence and unrelenting efforts, the deliberations and A few hours ago, the Mechanism’s Appeals Chamber judgment preparation could continue. In the end, the pronounced its judgment in a high-profile case against Appeals Chamber was able to pronounce its judgment Mr. Ratko Mladić. In brief, the Appeals Chamber just shortly after the previously projected date. dismissed Mr. Mladić’s appeal and affirmed his convictions for genocide, persecution, extermination, With today’s delivery, the Mechanism has made murder, deportation and other inhumane acts consisting another tremendous step towards the finalization of its in forcible transfer as crimes against humanity and core judicial work. This case is also a testament to what for murder, terror, unlawful attacks on civilians and can be achieved through international justice processes 2/25 21-14423 08/06/2021 International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals S/PV.8790 when States have the will to cooperate and overcome regard to case preparation and other relevant issues, geopolitical roadblocks. In that regard, I recall that, and, following that, a pretrial workplan was announced. while Mr. Mladić was indicted by the International Furthermore, an independent medical expert has been Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) assigned to examine Mr. Kabuga’s health, including his as early as 1995, it was thanks to the persistence of fitness to stand trial and ability to travel to the Arusha the ICTY Prosecutor, together with the support of the Branch. A report on those questions is expected later international community, that 15 years later his arrest in June. was eventually secured. The issuance of the final While most of our cases involving in-court judgment sends a strong message to victims of atrocities proceedings are winding up, I recall that the Mechanism committed in the former Yugoslavia and elsewhere that is, of course, mandated to carry out many other residual the perpetrators of such heinous crimes will ultimately functions. Among them is the supervision of the be brought to justice regardless of their position or how enforcement of sentences imposed by the ICTR, the powerful and untouchable they consider themselves to ICTY and the Mechanism itself. I again express my be. While judgments such as this cannot bring back deepest appreciation for the invaluable contribution loved ones or heal the wounds or trauma endured, it is of the 15 States Members of the United Nations in my hope that victims and their families will take some Africa and Europe that, in currently enforcing the measure of solace from seeing justice being done and sentence of one or more convicted persons, continue to history being recorded. assume significant additional responsibilities. I fully Today’s events leave us with two more judgments recognize that that has been more challenging during to be issued this month. the pandemic. First, I am pleased to inform you that the judgment Your country, Mr. President, as well as France, in the Stanišić and Simatović retrial is expected to Norway and the United Kingdom, present here today, be delivered by 30 June. The proceedings progressed together with the Mechanism’s other enforcement extremely efficiently during the reporting period, States, have gone above and beyond in enabling us to with closing arguments held in April despite various carry out our mandate. I praise each of them for taking challenges and intensive deliberations continuing the necessary measures to keep our convicted persons apace. I commend the Trial Chamber for having kept safe and for regularly reporting to the Mechanism with things on track throughout. Following the conclusion of regard to their well-being and the COVID-19 situation the retrial, any appeal proceedings in that case will be within the relevant prisons. heard at the Hague Branch. Bearing in mind the paramount importance of Secondly, at the Arusha Branch, the contempt securing the continued enforcement of sentences, I case against Mr. Anselme Nzabonimpa et al., formerly sincerely hope that additional States will step forward Turinabo et al., is also nearing

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    25 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us