Trading Foreign Exchange Triplets I Forthcoming, SIAM J. Financial Mathematics Alvaro´ Carteaa, Sebastian Jaimungalb, Tianyi Jiab aMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance, Oxford, UK bDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Abstract We develop the optimal trading strategy for a foreign exchange (FX) broker who must liqui- date a large position in an illiquid currency pair. To maximize revenues, the broker considers trading in a currency triplet which consists of the illiquid pair and two other liquid currency pairs. The liquid pairs in the triplet are chosen so that one of the pairs is redundant. The broker is risk-neutral and accounts for model ambiguity in the FX rates to make her strategy robust to model misspecification. When the broker is ambiguity neutral (averse) the trading strategy in each pair is independent (dependent) of the inventory in the other two pairs in the triplet. We employ simulations to illustrate how the robust strategies perform. For a range of ambiguity aversion parameters, we find the mean Profit and Loss (P&L) of the strategy increases and the standard deviation of the P&L decreases as ambiguity aversion increases. Keywords: Foreign Exchange, Currency Pairs, Optimal Liquidation, Execution, Inventory Aversion, Ambiguity Aversion 1. Introduction arXiv:2004.12011v1 [q-fin.TR] 24 Apr 2020 Trading activity in the foreign exchange (FX) market is vast. On average, the daily turnover is in excess of 5 trillion USD, where approximately a third of this turnover is in the FX spot market, and the remainder is in FX derivatives: forwards, swaps, and options (see ISJ would like to acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), [funding reference numbers RGPIN-2018-05705 and RGPAS-2018-522715]. We thank seminar participants at the Fields Institute, PIMS Summer School in Mathematical Finance, LABEX{Paris, SIAM (Austin 2017), Dublin City University, Technical University Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin. This work first appeared on https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054656. Email addresses: [email protected] (Alvaro´ Cartea), [email protected] (Sebastian Jaimungal), [email protected] (Tianyi Jia) 1 BIS (2016)). All currencies are traded in the FX spot market, but most of the turnover is in a handful of pairs (USD/EUR, USD/JPY, USD/GBP, USD/AUD, USD/CAD). The market quotes a rate for those who buy (bid) or sell (ask) the currency pair, where the difference between the ask and the bid prices is the quoted spread and the average of the bid and ask prices is the mid-exchange rate. A currency pair is traded by simultaneously taking a long position in one currency and a short position in the other currency of the pair. The conversion rate between the two currencies is given by the bid (resp. ask) if the investor is going long (resp. short) the currency pair. In this paper we show how a broker liquidates a large position in an illiquid currency pair. One approach is to trade only the pair the broker aims to liquidate. An alternative is for the broker to trade in three currency pairs, one of which is the illiquid pair and the additional pairs are such that the three pairs are formed by combinations of only three currencies. Therefore, by no-arbitrage, one of the currency pairs can be replicated by taking positions in the other two pairs, and hence the dynamics of the three currency pairs exhibit strong co-movements. Ideally, at least one of the two additional pairs is very liquid (heavily traded), so this \triangle" dependence between the pairs is considered by the broker to devise liquidation strategies that offset the illiquidity in one pair with the two other more liquid pairs. There is no central Exchange framework in FX, so brokers trade in electronic communi- cation networks (ECNs) with multiple liquidity providers and via other channels with their own pool of clients, see Cartea et al. (2015) and Oomen (2017). We refer to the broker's trading activities on all ECNs as trading in the `Exchange'. The broker can control her own liquidity taking orders sent to the Exchange, but has little or no control on the arrival rate of the orders of her clients. The broker is risk-neutral and acknowledges that her model of mid-exchange rates of the currency pairs, which is represented by a reference measure P, may be misspecified. She deals with this model uncertainty, also referred to as ambiguity aversion, by considering alternative models when she develops the optimal execution strategy, see Cartea et al. (2017) and Cartea et al. (2016). These alternative models are characterized by probability measures that are absolutely continuous with respect to the reference model P. The decision to reject the reference measure is based on a penalty that the broker incurs if she adopts an alternative model. The magnitude of the penalty depends on the broker's degree of ambiguity aversion and is based on a measure of the distance between the reference and the alternative measure. The broker solves an optimal control problem where the objective is to liquidate a large position in an illiquid pair, and does by submitting liquidity taking orders to the Exchange in all three currency pairs. These orders have a temporary impact in the quote currency of the pair. That is, when the broker executes trades in the Exchange she receives worse rates than the quoted mid-exchange rate. The broker simultaneously fills orders from her pool of clients. These orders are filled at the mid-exchange rate and clients pay a service fee to the 2 broker, where the size of the fee is proportional to the size of the order in the currency pair. We show that when the broker is ambiguity neutral, i.e., fully trusts the reference model, the optimal trading strategy in each currency pair is independent of the level of inventory in the other two pairs. Thus, the broker's strategy does not employ the other two currency pairs of the triplet to optimally execute a position in an illiquid pair. On the other hand, when the broker is ambiguity averse, the inventory position in each pair affects the trading strategy in the other two pairs. As the level of ambiguity aversion increases, the speed at which the strategy builds positions in the liquid pairs of the triplet increases. We also demonstrate that the ambiguity averse broker makes her model robust to mis- specification by adopting a candidate measure where the drifts of the mid-exchange rates are different from those of the reference model. Specifically, when the broker's initial position in the illiquid pair is short (resp. long), the broker devises a strategy where the drift in the mid- exchange rates of the currency pairs in the triplet, relative to the model under the reference measure P, is larger (resp. smaller). This affects the speed of trading in the robust model, relative to that of the reference model, because the expected growth in the mid-exchange rate of the currency pair affects the value of the inventory. For example, if a currency pair is expected to appreciate, then, everything else being equal, it is optimal to increase the position in that pair. We use simulations, based on parameters calibrated to FX data, to illustrate the perfor- mance of the strategy. Our results show that when the broker makes her model robust to misspecification, the mean Profit and Loss (P&L) of the strategy increases and the standard deviation of the P&L decreases. To the best of our knowledge this is the first paper that shows how FX brokers manage large positions in currency pairs. Our framework can be extended to FX trading algorithms to make markets and those designed to take speculative positions in currency pairs with strong co- dependence. Although the literature on algorithmic trading in the FX market is scant, there is a large body of work that looks at optimal liquidation, and other algorithmic strategies in equity markets. For comprehensive treatments of algorithmic trading and microstructure issues in equity markets see Lehalle and Laruelle (2013), Cartea et al. (2015), Gu´eant (2016), Abergel et al. (2016). The remainder of the paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 presents the broker's reference model for the currency pairs and discusses the broker's cashflows from dealing currency pairs with her pool of clients and from executing trades in the FX Exchange. Section 3 solves the control problem for the ambiguity neutral broker. Section 4 shows how the broker introduces model ambiguity to make the model robust to misspecification and solves the control problem of the ambiguity averse broker and provides the optimal speed to trade the currency pairs in the triplet. Section 5 illustrates the performance of the strategy and Section 6 concludes. 3 1 Yt Xt Zt 3 2 Figure 1: Currencies and exchange rates for pairs in the FX triplet. The quote currency (the start of the arrow) is sold at the rate shown on the link, and one unit of the base currency (the end of the arrow) purchased. For example, when the broker goes long the currency pair (2; 1) in a frictionless market, she buys one unit of the base currency 2 and sells Xt units of quote currency 1. Finally, some proofs are collected in the Appendix. 2. Model Setup FX traders buy and sell currency pairs. Trading in a pair of currencies involves the simultaneous sale of one currency and purchase of another currency and the price at which this transaction is done is the mid-exchange rate plus (minus) half the quoted spread when longing (shorting) the pair.