Heart Transplant Pathology: the British Experience

Heart Transplant Pathology: the British Experience

J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.38.2.146 on 1 February 1985. Downloaded from J Clin Pathol 1985;38:146-159 Heart transplant pathology: the British experience ARIELA POMERANCE, PGI STOVIN From the Departments ofHistopathology, Harefield and Mount Vernon Group Laboratories, Middlesex, and Papworth Hospital, Cambridge SUMMARY An account of human heart transplantation as seen by the histopathologists involved at the two UK transplant centres is presented. Between January 1979 and July 1984 179 patients received 186 hearts and 124 are still alive up to four years after operation. Cyclosporin A based immunosuppression has been used in the last 120 patients. Four patients developed neo- plastic lesions. The commonest reason for transplantation was ischaemic heart disease (63%), followed by congestive cardiomyopathy (35%). The seven retransplants were for acute or chronic rejection. The monitoring of rejection by endomyocardial biopsies is described, and the causes of death and necropsy findings are presented. Since Barnard' performed the first human heart Harefield hospital cases 100- transplant in 1967, over 1000 patients world wide Ea Immunosuppression have received new hearts. Most transplants have included cyclosporin A 80- Group contains fewer been orthotopic, in which the old heart is removed tQ 0cases copyright. leaving the posterior walls of the atria and the donor Immunosuppressionr heart is sutured to the atrial remnants and great 60- - without cyclosporin A Group contains fewer vessels. Initial survival rates were poor, and it was 2tn3 cases not until late 1979, after improved immunosuppres- 40- sive agents and safe endomyocardial biopsy had become available, that the UK transplant pro- 20- gramme was reactivated. 0 The two UK cardiac transplant centres are at 0 Papworth and Harefield hospitals, where between http://jcp.bmj.com/ -a January 1979 and July 1984 186 transplants were Papworth hospital cases performed on 179 patients, including 20 heterotopic > 100- transplants in the 110 patients operated on at un Harefield. In this operation, as pioneered by Bar- 80- l nard and his team2 the hearts are joined by their atria and great vessels so that the new heart works in 60- parallel with the old. The seven retransplants, done on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected between 10 days and about three years after the first 40- operation, were performed for acute or chronic rejec- tion. Both centres initially used antithymocyte 20 - globulin, prednisolone, and azathioprine for immunosuppression. Both now use cyclosporin A, 0- which appears to be a selective inhibitor of T cells.3 1 2 3 4 Both rely extensively on endomyocardial biopsy for Time after transplant (yr) monitoring rejection. Fig. 1 Survival rates for heart transplant recipients at Interest in cardiac transplantation is increasing Papworth and Harefield hospitals. and is encouraged by the present results. A hundred and twenty four of our 174 patients who survived the operation are still alive, and these include 13 patients operated on more than three years ago (Fig. 1). The results have been greatly improved by cyc- losporin A, which was introduced in the first quarter Accepted for publication 1 October 1984 of 1982 in Papworth and the last quarter in 146 J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.38.2.146 on 1 February 1985. Downloaded from Heart transplant pathology: the British experience 147 Harefield. This drug has reduced the frequency and adhesions prevent tamponade if the bioptome pene- severity of both rejection and infective episodes, and trates the ventricular wall, and the most trouble- the one year actuarial survival of patients treated some of the infrequent complications is with cyclosporin A is now about 75%. While few pneumothorax. pathologists are likely to be concerned with monitor- Biopsies are done at roughly weekly intervals dur- ing cardiac rejection the likelihood of performing ing the first month after operation and then every necropsies on these patients is increasing. We there- two weeks. After discharge biopsies usually con- fore present our experiences to date and describe tinue at 3, 4, and 6 months postransplant and then what involvement in a heart transplant programme annually. Additional biopsies are done if rejection is entails for the histopathologist. suspected because of reduced electrocardiogram voltages, fever, rhythm changes, heart failure, or The recipient heart weight gain. At Papworth, with five new cases every two months and 52 surviving patients, this entails The causes of the recipients' cardiac failure are about nine cardiac biopsies a week. At Harefield, shown in Table 1. The pathology of these conditions with four to six new patients a month and 75 surviv- is amply described in the published work and we do ing patients, 9 to 24 such biopsies are performed not propose to consider it here beyond pointing out each week. the obvious opportunity to examine substantial The introduction of cyclosporin A based amounts of fresh tissue from severely diseased immunosuppression into the UK heart transplant hearts. This examination will make considerable programmes has influenced the histopathology as demands on the time of histopathologist and well as prognosis. With this drug, which appears to laboratory staff, however, and almost invariably - have a selective effect on T cells,4 rejection develops occurs out of laboratory hours. and resolves more slowly, the risk of intercurrent infection is less, but nephrotoxicity is an important Control of unmunosuppression postoperative problem. The classic changes of rejec- tion still occur, although less often, but additional copyright. The transplant patient needs to maintain a stable features are added to those which may be noted in balance between a level of immunosuppression the endomyocardial biopsy. sufficient to prevent rejection but one low enough to avoid an unacceptable risk of opportunistic infec- Technical aspects tion. For patients on conventional immunosuppression There is some variation in the techniques used in our with azathioprine and steroids plus antithymocyte laboratories. Rapid processing must be available globulin, measurement of peripheral blood T cell because of the need for urgent treatment in severe http://jcp.bmj.com/ count is of some use in monitoring rejection45 but rejection, although the introduction of cyclosporin this is of no value in patients treated with cyclospo- A has reduced the frequency of urgent biopsies. rin A.6' Identification of T cell subsets have not so Both centres initially tried conventional frozen sec- far proved helpful in monitoring immunotherapy or tions but found them unsatisfactory except in severe detecting rejection episodes,8 although they may be rejection. Papworth now uses a 2 h paraffin proces- of use in detecting infection. O'Toole9 has reported sing cycle (Autotechnicon Ultra II) and sections are that the suppressor to helper T cell ratio in peri- ready for reading 4 h after receipt. The Mount on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected pheral blood is reversed in infection but not in rejec- Vernon/Harefield laboratory processes urgent cases tion. manually, also providing a report within 4 h, while In cardiac transplantation the mainstay of detec- non-urgent cases are processed overnight with the tion and control of rejection is transvenous right routine non-cardiac biopsies. ventricular biopsy, as described by Caves et al.'0 The microscopical changes of rejection are patchy This is a relatively safe procedure. Postoperative and so normally at least three samples of myocar- dium are taken to reduce the chance of missing acute rejection to 5%." Biopsies are fixed in 10% Table 1 Aetiology ofrecipient's heart disease neutral buffered formalin, which shows interstitial No ofpatients oedema better than the traditional rapid fixatives such as Carnoy, which is used for Harefield biopsies. Ischaemic 113 Cardiomyopathy (COCM) 62 All the pieces are embedded in a single block with Valvular heart disease 5 no attempt at orientation. This is serially sectioned, Congenital heart disease 8 Tumour (low grade providing 10-12 slides each with a ribbon of four to neurofibrosarcoma) 1 eight sections. Representative levels are stained with J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.38.2.146 on 1 February 1985. Downloaded from 148 Pomerance, Stovin .eB. :. oiS sh ,:L Ss P .E . ' .:... 0.. 4 : .: S ... ....... S. jX .,;. :y: ;. :.:. .. ;.X. *.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....... , .ad.ik. ;.. 40 :e .. sSS: iR *#g *< * ; ? e~~ 4. faZ.<.. '- .4 n $+ $ mE .B- .w ...i.E. *1;f ^-.F *S q srS. a ;!.. ... ". w;..X s-u .:...... copyright. http://jcp.bmj.com/ on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected Fig. 2 Mild rejection. Small collections ofinterstitial lymphocytes are present. Haematoxylin, phloxin, saffron (HPS). Fig. 3 Moderate rejection. More frequent and more intense cellular infiltration with commencing damage to myocytes. HPS. Fig. 4 Moderate rejection, of more intense degree than on Fig. 2. HPS. Fig. 5 Severe rejection showing dense cellular infiltration which includes neutrophils. HPS. haematoxylin, phloxin, and saffron (Papworth) or tribution, and composition of the cellular infiltrate haematoxylin and eosin (Harefield) and intervening and also show the myofibre morphology. Methyl levels stained with methyl green pyronine and Mas- green pyronine staining shows the degree of son trichrome, leaving the remainder as spares. The pyroninophilia and the proportion of mononuclear haematoxylin stained slides show the extent,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us