DRUZHKIVKA CITY PROFILE 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE Feeling that authorities represent Druzhkivka 15 cities* citizens’ concerns Believing that and views, equally TRUST IN MAYOR OR authorities are care about all parts 5.2 and can be held 2.8 2.4 of Ukraine and are HEAD OF THE TOWN accountable ready to listen ACCOUNTABILITY UKRAINIAN TRUST IN UKRAINIAN 5.1 OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES CARE ARMY OVERALL LEVEL OF TRUST IN TOWN 4.9 PERCEIVED LEVEL OF CORRUPTION AMONG… CORRUPTION ADMINISTRATION 5.4 TRUST IN POLICE 4.2 6.2 6.1 5.5 6.9 TRUST IN COURTS 4.0 4.3 2.8 0 2 4 6 8 10 PARLIAMENTA- JUDGES / POLICE TEACHERS LOCAL Create interventions to sustain and enhance levels of RIANS PROSECUTORS AUTHORITIES trust in authorities and courts. COMMUNITY BONDS & VALUES Druzhkivka 15 cities* CONTACT WITH PEOPLE FROM THE FOLLOWING GROUPS COMMUNITY COOPERATION 5.2 5.3 Feeling that people in their community care for each PEOPLE FROM other and cooperate to solve common problems. 8.0 EASTERN UKRAINE CONFIDENCE THAT PEOPLE FROM IDPS 4.6 WESTERN UKRAINE WILL LISTEN PEOPLE LIVING 2.4 IN THE NGCA PEOPLE FROM 2.1 WESTERN UKRAINE ATO/JFO MILITARY 2.0 PERSONNEL PRO-EU 1.8 ORIENTED PEOPLE PRO-RUSSIA 1.6 ORIENTED PEOPLE 0 2 4 6 8 10 Use citizens’ confidence that people fromthe western Ukraine will listen to them to promote contact with people from western Ukraine with inter-regional initiatives to develop national dialogue and increase community cooperation. * CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities LOCALITY SATISFACTION SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE (in terms of jobs, leisure activities 6.8 5.8 and raising children) Druzhkivka 15 cities* POLITICAL SECURITY PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES QUALITY OF PUBLIC 7.6 TRANSPORT WELFARE PAYMENTS 7.6 ADMINISTRATIVE 7.2 SERVICES BASIC SCHOOLING 6.9 UTILITIES 6.9 JUSTICE SERVICES 5.8 QUALITY OF ROADS 5.7 HEALTH CARE 5.5 HIGHER EDUCATION 4.6 41 % of citizens of Druzhkivka do not feel that they are 0 2 4 6 8 10 free to get together with like-minded people. Engage Citizens of Druzhkivka assess the provision of public services more positively than other cities, except for higher education. citizens in civic initiatives that promote independent 84 % of respondents consider provision of public transport in local media outlets and political dialogue and pluralism Druzhkivka to be efficient. (i.e. debate clubs, cultural civic initiatives) to foster PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY freedom of expression. To what extent are you proud of the following in you locality? FAMOUS PEOPLE 7.3 PRIDE IN LOCALITY (OVERALL) 6.3 6.2 NATURE 7.2 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR CULTURAL HERITAGE 7.1 To change 36 % ACTIVE HOSPITALITY 7.1 things in your Willing to use political and social means community you of action without violence are... TRADITIONS 6.6 4 % VIOLENT Willing to use violence CUISINE 6.5 60 % PASSIVE Not willing to do anything CREATIVITY 6.2 Level of locality satisfaction is significantly COMMUNITY BONDS 5.8 higher than the average, foster this pride with small scale civic initiatives concentrated on local SAFETY 4.6 nature, cultural heritage, famous people. Use INDUSTRY AND 4.3 these initiatives to motivate passive citizens. PRODUCTION 0 2 4 6 8 10 * CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for Eastern Ukraine 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org.