The Duck Genome and Transcriptome Provide Insight Into an Avian Influenza Virus Reservoir Species

The Duck Genome and Transcriptome Provide Insight Into an Avian Influenza Virus Reservoir Species

ARTICLES OPEN The duck genome and transcriptome provide insight into an avian influenza virus reservoir species Yinhua Huang1,2,20, Yingrui Li3,20, David W Burt2,20, Hualan Chen4, Yong Zhang3, Wubin Qian3, Heebal Kim5, Shangquan Gan1, Yiqiang Zhao1, Jianwen Li3, Kang Yi3, Huapeng Feng4, Pengyang Zhu4, Bo Li3, Qiuyue Liu1, Suan Fairley6, Katharine E Magor7, Zhenlin Du1, Xiaoxiang Hu1, Laurie Goodman3, Hakim Tafer8,9, Alain Vignal10, Taeheon Lee5, Kyu-Won Kim11, Zheya Sheng1, Yang An1, Steve Searle6, Javier Herrero12, Martien A M Groenen13, Richard P M A Crooijmans13, Thomas Faraut10, Qingle Cai3, Robert G Webster14, Jerry R Aldridge14, Wesley C Warren15, Sebastian Bartschat8, Stephanie Kehr8, Manja Marz8, Peter F Stadler8,9, Jacqueline Smith2, Robert H S Kraus16,17, Yaofeng Zhao1, Liming Ren1, Jing Fei1, Mireille Morisson10, Pete Kaiser2, Darren K Griffin18, Man Rao1, Frederique Pitel10, Jun Wang3,19 & Ning Li1 The duck (Anas platyrhynchos) is one of the principal natural hosts of influenza A viruses. We present the duck genome sequence and perform deep transcriptome analyses to investigate immune-related genes. Our data indicate that the duck possesses a contractive immune gene repertoire, as in chicken and zebra finch, and this repertoire has been shaped through lineage-specific duplications. We identify genes that are responsive to influenza A viruses using the lung transcriptomes of control ducks and ones that were infected with either a highly pathogenic (A/duck/Hubei/49/05) or a weakly pathogenic (A/goose/Hubei/65/05) H5N1 virus. Further, we show how the duck’s defense mechanisms against influenza infection have been optimized through the diversification of its b-defensin and butyrophilin-like repertoires. These analyses, in combination with the genomic and transcriptomic data, provide a resource for characterizing the interaction between host and influenza viruses. Birds are distinct from other vertebrates in many characteristics, both in these areas. Ducks diverged from the related chicken and turkey 4 © 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. America, Inc. © 2013 Nature morphological (for example, feathers and eggs) and physiological (for and zebra finch approximately 90–100 million years ago . The duck example, their lightweight skeletons and high metabolic rates). Birds is also one of the most economically important waterfowl as a source occupy habitats from the Arctic to the Antarctic, and they have body of meat, eggs and feathers. size ranging from 5 cm to 2.8 m. The diversity found in birds inspires Of special interest to medicine and agriculture is the fact that ducks npg us to investigate the genomic differences underlying their phenotypic serve as the principal natural reservoir for influenza A viruses and differences from mammals and the variation within the avian class. harbor all 16 hemagglutinin (HA) and 9 neuraminidase (NA) subtypes The sequencing of the chicken genome1 provided the first insight into that are currently known5,6, with the exception of the H13 and H16 the evolutionary events between birds and other vertebrates. Avian subtypes7. Often, influenza strains cause the duck no harm. However, evolutionary events have subsequently been elucidated with the recent the long-standing equilibrium between influenza A viruses and the availability of the zebra finch and turkey genomes2,3. Additional avian duck has been disrupted with the emergence of H5N1 viruses8. H5N1 genomes, however, are needed to provide more detailed evolution- strains have caused unprecedented outbreaks in poultry in more than ary information and insight into adaptation mechanisms. The duck 60 countries and have caused 622 human infections (as of March (A. platyrhynchos) is particularly well suited for further exploration 2013), with an overall fatality rate of 59% in humans. Recently, it was 1State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. 2The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. 4National Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Harbin, China. 5Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 6Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. 7Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 8Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 9Department of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Castanet-Tolosan, France. 11Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 12European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. 13Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 14Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 15The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 16Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 17Conservation Genetics Group, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Gelnhausen, Germany. 18Genetics School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Kent, UK. 19Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 20These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence should be addressed to J.W. ([email protected]) or N.L. ([email protected]). Received 16 December 2012; accepted 8 May 2013; published online 9 June 2013; doi:10.1038/ng.2657 776 VOLUME 45 | NUMBER 7 | JULY 2013 NATURE GENETICS ARTICLES Table 1 Number and length of reads and number of genes detected using RNA sequencing in control and H5N1 virus–infected ducks Number of DEGs Number of uniquely Number of DEGs and PSGsa and PSGsa (versus Number of mapped reads (versus control) GS/65-infected ducks) Total length of expressed Frequency Frequency Group Total reads reads (bp) genes Genome Gene DEGs of PSGs DEG set DEGs of PSGs DEG set Control 146,618,064 13,195,625,760 18,181 84,895,562 72,455,573 DK/49 (day 1) 116,561,634 10,490,547,060 18,276 60,873,691 49,811,986 2,257 63/957 1,506 38/624 DK/49 (day 2) 133,943,194 12,054,887,460 18,233 73,475,680 59,066,187 3,101 89/1,413 1,436 44/654 DK/49 (day 3) 136,923,500 12,323,115,000 17,951 81,116,464 65,172,557 3,066 86/1,383 5,038 1,396 44/625 3,232 GS/65 (day 1) 138,642,320 12,477,808,800 18,135 81,176,979 66,830,938 916 20/367 GS/65 (day 2) 127,576,536 11,481,888,240 18,140 72,750,242 58,940,732 2,060 58/918 GS/65 (day 3) 116,267,820 10,464,103,800 17,983 69,337,186 56,072,340 1,251 29/538 2,741 aDEGs are genes that showed significantly different expression with FDR≤ 0.001 and fold change ≥2. PSGs are genes that are predicted to be under positive selection with FDR <0.05. The numerator and denominator for the frequencies of PSGs are the number of positively selected genes and genes where a likelihood ratio test was performed for PSGs, respectively. reported that an engineered influenza virus encoding hemagglutinin aligned to the duck assembly. We further aligned the duck and chicken from the highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza A strains can be assemblies to the human using Narcisse. This effort showed that the transmitted between ferrets9, emphasizing the potential for a human coverage of the two avian assemblies of the human genome (GRCh37) pandemic to emerge from birds. Furthermore, weakly pathogenic was similar, indicating that the quality of the duck and chicken assem- avian influenza A viruses, such as H9N2 (ref. 10) and H7N2 (ref. 11) blies was comparable. In addition, in aligning the duck assembly onto strains, have caused transient infections in humans12. The exceptional the chicken genome sequence using GLINT software with its default virulence of avian influenza viruses in humans, in combination with parameters18, only 41 of the 78,847 duck scaffolds were identified their ongoing evolution in birds, motivates us to better understand as possible chimeras when applying the criterion that they contain host immune responses to avian influenza viruses. We report here sequences that partially map to two different chicken chromosomes. the duck whole-genome sequence and compared it to the genomes of These data indicate that the duck assembly has good coverage and mammals and other birds. We performed deep transcriptome analyses generally provides a reasonable substrate for the analysis presented of lungs from control ducks and ones that were infected with either a in this study. highly pathogenic (A/duck/Hubei/49/05, DK/49) or a weakly patho- We defined reference gene sets from the duck assembly using the genic (A/goose/Hubei/65/05, GS/65) H5N1 virus13. BGI and Ensembl pipelines (Supplementary Note). For the BGI refer- ence set, we aligned the duck transcriptome data and human (22,232) RESULTS and chicken (16,701) genes to the duck genome assembly, yielding The genome landscape 15,065 predicted protein-coding duck genes. We applied GENSCAN19 We sequenced the genome of a 10-week-old female Beijing duck and Augustus20 with the default parameters and predicted 32,383 using methods similar to those applied to sequence the giant panda and 22,739 protein-coding genes in the duck draft genome for the genome14. In total, we generated 77 Gb of paired-end reads (approxi- respective reference sets (Supplementary Table 6). Finally, we inte- © 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. America, Inc. © 2013 Nature mately 64-fold coverage of the whole genome) with an average length grated all gene sources and created a reference set containing 19,144 of 50 bp (Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and Supplementary Table 1). genes, constituting approximately 2.3% of the total duck assembly. Of Using SOAPdenovo (Supplementary Note), we combined short reads these 19,144 genes, 9,678 were mapped to categories established by npg to generate a draft assembly, which consisted of 78,487 scaffolds and the Gene Ontology (GO) Project, 14,725 had orthologs in the Kyoto covered 1.1 Gb.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us