3rd Steering Committee JJAABODBODETETAABEKBEKMMeetrtropoopolliittan Pan Prriioriorityty A Arreeaa ((MMPPAA)) OOccttoobberer 20122012 CChrhroononologlogy oy off MPMPAA MaMasstterer PPlanlan SSubub--tteecchnhniiccaall MMttg/Sg/Seeccttoror MMeeeettiingng TTeecchnhniiccaall CCommommiitttteeee SStteeeerriinngg CCoommmmiitttteeee 2011 2012 MPA Committees 3…678910…1…4567…10 SStteeeerriingng CommiCommitttteeee ((SSC)C) … 1st SC (Approval of 17 FTPs) : held prior to the Study … 2nd SC (Approval of VISION 2030) … 3rd SC (Approval of Masterplan) Today TTeecchnhniiccaall CommiCommitttteeee ((TTC)C) … 1st TC (Kick-off) … 2nd TC (Inception Report) … 3rd TC (VISION 2030/List of PPs) … 4th TC (MP 2020/Progress of FTPs) … 55thth TTCC ((LLiisstt of PPPPss)) … 6th TC (Finalization) MMoonniittoorriinngg ooff PPrroogrgressess ooff FTPFTPss … Note: FTPs: Fast Track Projects, PPs: Priority Projects - Prior to the committees, sub-technical committees/sector meetings have been held as appropriate. 22 AGENDAAGENDA I. MPA Master Plan toward 2020: (T/C’s Recommendation(1)): to consent MPA Masterplan. II. Fast-Track Projects and Priority Projects (T/C’s Recommendation(2)):to continue to monitor the implementation; and to agree 5 flagship projects. III. The Further Way Forward (T/C’s Recommendation(3)): to set up the mechanism and framework to accelerate the implementation. 33 I. MPMPAA MaMasstteerr PlaPlann ttoowwaarrdd 20202020 ((SummarSummary)y) 1. Background of the Study 2. Current situation of JABODETABEK MPA 3. Current condition of Infrastructure 4. Vision toward 2030 5. Strategies for M/P toward 2020 6. Masterplan (M/P) toward 2020 by Sectors 44 1. BaBacckgrkgrooundund ooff the StudyStudy --PPoositsitioionn ooff MPMPAA MaMasstterer PPlalann -- HowHow wwililll MMPPAA MMaassteterr PlaPlann bbee i innteteggrraatetedd inintoto MMP3P3EI?EI? FFininanancciaiall && P Planlannniningg SSyysstteemm SpSpaatialtial PPlanlannniningg SSyysstteemm NNatiatioonnalal LLoonngg--TTerermm NNatiatioonnalal SpSpatiatialal DDevevelelooppmenmentt PlPlanan PlPlanan (R(RTTRRWWNN)) (R(RPJPPJPNN 20020055--20252025)) MMasteasterr PlPlanan ooff AAcceccellereratiatioonn anandd RRegegiioonnalal SpSpatiatialal ExpExpanansisioonn ooff IInnddoonnesiesiaa PlPlanan Economic Development JabJabooddetabetabekek-- (M(MP3EP3EII)) ppuunnjjuurr NNatiatioonnalal MMedediiuumm--TTerermm (Pr(Presiesiddenentitialal DDevevelelooppmenmentt PlPlanan DDecrecreeee (R(RPJMPJMNN 20120100--20142014)) NNoo..54/54/20020088)) SpSpatiatialal PlPlanan foforr MasMastteerr PlanPlan fforor EsEsttablablishishiningg PrProovviinnce/ce/DDiistrstriicctt GoGovverernnmenmentt WWoorrkk PlPlanan anandd MeMettrropolopolititanan PrioritPriorityy AArreeaa DDrraftaft BBuuddggetet RRevevenenuuee ExpExpenenddiituturree (R(RKKP/P/RRAAPBPBNN)) ((MPMPAA)) fforor IInnvveessttmmeenntt andand IIndndususttrryy 55 SSouourcrcee:: MMPPAA SSttuudydy TTeeaamm,, babasseedd onon MMPP33EEII dodoccumeumentnt 1. BaBacckgrkgrooundund ooff the StudyStudy ––FuFuttuurree GGDDPP GGrroowwtthh inin MPMP33EEII -- Plans for Indonesia’s GDP Growth in MP3EI Source: MP3EI 66 1. BaBacckgrkgrooundund ooff the StudyStudy - Economic Corridors in MP3EI - SSiixx eecoconnoommiicc ccorrorriiddorsors wwereere fformormuullatateded iinn MMPP3E3EII.. Source: MP3EI 77 1. BaBacckgrkgrooundund ooff the StudyStudy - MPA’s Contribution to MP3EI - HHooww wwiillll MMPPAA ccononttriribubuttee ttoo EEcocononommiicc CCoorrriridodorr iinn MMPP3E3EII?? HHuubbss aanndd NoNoddeses inin J Jaavava aanndd SuSumamattrraa EEccoonnoomicmic CCoorrrrididoorrss JAKARTA Source: MP3EI 88 1. Background of the Study1. Background of the Study Background IndexCompetitiveness-related of Ranka) Ratio FDI/GDP of Change Annual b) of the Study1. Background 1. Singapore 2 1 3 9 3 4 1 2 110 3715 8 Rank (out of countries) 142 India 56 69 89 105 101 87 70 81 21 93 3 43 38 Russian Federation Russian PhilippinesVietnamBrazil 75 117 AfricaSouth 105 54 65 92 50Thailand 87 71 53 46China 90 88 77 62 65Malaysia 113 64 55 73 71 115 131 103 39 83 87 73 75 67 36 57 32 46 26 21 42 113 57 95 73 108 48 30 28 83 79 44 4 26 83 43 33 10 76 29 62 54 87 32 25 33 42 10 66 58 38 38 30 31 45 41 15 50 44 36 20 84 48 22 3 77 47 44 54 2 29 37 20 29 24 Indonesia 46 71 than other countries to catch more FDI. more catch to countries other than investors for destination attractive bemore needs Indonesia to Global Competitiveness 66 128 48 44 68 52 128 65 127 68 8 114 71 Index 2011-2012 Institutions 76 23 Infrastructure Macroeconomic environment 64 69 67 Health and primary education Source: World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 GlobalReport CompetitivenessEconomic Forum, World Source: Higher education and training Goods market efficiency 94 Labor market efficiency 69 Financial Market development 94 15 Technological readiness Market size 45 36 Business Sophistication Innovation 12% 10% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 --Current Position of Indonesia Current Position of Position Indonesia -- Current of Position Indonesia --Current Thailand Indonesia Cambodia PDR Lao Philippines Vietnam Malaysia 99 2. Current Situation of JABODETABEK MPA2. MPA 2.1 Social Situation2.1 Situation Population density is the highest in DKI Jakarta, but population growth in other MPA areas is larger than that in DKI Jakarta. a) Population Density (2010) b) Population Growth Rate (2000-2010) people/ha Source: Central Statistical Bureau Population Area Annual City / Regency 2 (km ) 2000 2010 growth rate 5% 2000-2010 Source: Central Statistical Bureau JABODETABEK 6,400.71 21,232,069 27,951,404 2.79% MPA MPA East: Kota Bekasi DKI Jakarta 664.01 8,389,443 9,588,198 1.34% Kab. Bekasi MPA South: Kota Depok MPA East 1,480.00 3,332,296 4,966,040 4.07% Kota Bogor MPA South 2,981.77 5,403,048 7,456,375 3.27% Kab. Bogor MPA West : Kota Tangerang MPA West 1,274.93 4,107,282 4,900,771 3.76% Kota Tangerang Selatan 1010 Source: Central Statistical Bureau Kab. Tangerang 2. Current Situation of JABODETABEK MPA2. MPA 2.2 Economic Situation2.2 Situation a) Share of GRDP by Area b) Sectorial Composition of GRDP in the Cities/Regencies Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries Mining and Quarrying Manufacturing MPA West Utilities Construction Trading, hotels and restaurants Transportation and communications Finance, Ownership and Businesses Services MPA South 9% 8% JABODETABEK Finance, Ownership, MPA East DKI Jakarta 12% Manufacturing DKI Jakarta MPA East 71% Trading, hotels and restaurants MPA South Source: Compiled from BPS documents MPA West Majority of the economic Source:Compiled from BPS documents activities concentrate in DKI Jakarta. The production of MPA East is heavily dependent on the manufacturing sector. 1111 3. Current Condition of Infrastructure3. Infrastructure 3.1 View from Transportation3.1 Transportation b) Commuter Satisfaction a) Increment of Commuter Traffic Trip of Public Transport in Major Asian Cities (2002) 247 (2002) 262 (2010) 344 (2010) 423 Shanghai 67.5 Kota Tangerang Kota Tangerang DKI Kota Bekasi Kota Tangarang S. DKI New Delhi 62 Kota Tangarang S. Jakarta Kab. Bekasi Kab. Tangerang Jakarta Kab. Tangerang 1.4 1.6 Kuala Lumpur 61 (2010/2002) (2010/2002) Beijing 60.5 Tokyo 60.5 1.4 (2002) 234 (2010/2002) (2010) 338 Singapore 54.5 BODETABEKDKI Kota Depok Seoul 36.5 Jakarta Kota Bogor 1.5 (unit) 1,000 (2002) 743 Jakarta 30.5 Kab. Bogori (2010/2002) (2010) 1,105 0 20 40 60 80 (Source:JUTPI) Journey Experience Index (Source: Frost & Sullivan, Journey Experience Index, May 2011) Traffic congestion is very serious especially in the peak hours by commuter traffic. Commuters in Jakarta are reported to be least satisfied travelers among major cities in Asia. 1212 3. Current Condition of Infrastructure3. Infrastructure 3.2 View from Disaster Prevention3.2 Prevention a) Flood Inundation Area in 2007 b) Vulnerability against Natural Catastrophe in Major Asian Cities Hong Kong Shanghai Tokyo Singapore Seoul Bangkok Delhi Manila Jakarta 0 2 4 6 8 10 Vulnerability Index (Source: Munich RE (2005), Megacities – Megarisks Trends and challenges for insurance and risk Source: Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Chiliwung- Cisadane Management ) Jakarta is seriously affected by flood Disaster prevention facilities against disaster periodically. flood, earthquake and other natural disaster are insufficient. 1313 4. Vision toward 2030 --SWOTSWOT Analysis Results -- Needs based Development Favorable Unfavolable on SWOT Concept STRENGTH WEAKNESS Switch to Multi- • Political and economic • Pertinent traffic jams Core urban capital • Large population and rapid structure I Growth n • 28 million population growth t e • • r Six cities/urban centers Shortage of electricity and n water a l • Water pollution Resilient capital • Shortage of solid waste with multiple treatment gateways High • Vulnerable to natural quality disasters of Life OPPORTUNITY THREAT Promote high-tech • Large population • Low competitiveness for high value industry E • Robust economy FDI x t • • Insufficient infrastructure Eco- e Abundant natural r • friendlin n resources Weak technology and a • innovation Need to adapt to l Huge market of ASEAN ess • Acceleration of market • Investment to other low-carbon integration and economic countries society partnership • Risk of global warming 1414 4.4. VViisisionon ttowowardard 22030300 --CCononceceptpts,s, GGoaoalls,s, PPrrogogramsrams -- DDeevveellooppmemenntt CCoonncceepptt GGooaallss PPrrooggrraamsms AA11.. DDeevveellooppmmeenntt ooff MMRRTT--bbaasseedd NNeeww UUrrbbaann TTrraannssppoorrtt SSyysstteemm AA22.