The expansion of European power and influence in the global economy in the early 16th century occurred through the cataclysmic events of European exploration. The exploration and conquests conducted primarily by the Spanish and Portuguese were motivated by a variety of factors. Motives for the Age of Exploration, simply stated, were glory, gold, and God. That is, conquerors ventured to the New World as service for their country, with the hopes of gaining personal power or wealth, and to spread Christianity—primarily Catholicism—to the sullen, pagan peoples of the Americas. The tumultuous events of the Age of Exploration also brought about new attitudes and opinions of Europeans and Natives. Most Europeans viewed Natives as simple, ignorant people to be exploited for religious conversion and economic gain. They also viewed Natives as hostile, barbaric peoples because of their violence towards conquerors. Natives feared, and were thusly hostile towards European explorers. Another attitude that developed later in the period was that of empathy for the brutal mistreatment of Natives through enslavement and exploitation. The consequences of the European­Amerindian interactions during the Age of Exploration also proved to be most tumultuous, as the New World population drastically decreased from Old World disease, the Amerindians became enslaved, and the New World resources were exploited by the conquerors. The Age of Exploration, through its motives, attitudes, and consequences, marked Europe’s cataclysmic emergence as a dominant world power. A very important aspect of the Age of Exploration was the question of why the Europeans came. A variety of factors drove Europeans to explore and conquer the New World, and these can be shown and explained through letters, documentary writings, and paintings of the period. Many were driven to the Americas through their quest for glory; conquering lands for personal accomplishment and for their home country. Others came in the name of God, hoping to spread their religious belief and doctrine. The motive for gaining commercial wealth, through the exploitation of New World resources also encouraged exploration. Ferdinand and Isabella, King and Queen of Spain, motivated Columbus to further explore the New World he had discovered, encouraging his success through promise to give him personal glory and power over the lands he conquered. This proves the motivation of personal achievement through attainment of power. However, there were other motives for the Catholic rulers of Spain to encourage exploration. Their motives were undoubtedly also driven by their want to earn wealth for Spain, but also foremost to spread Catholicism. The King and Queen are most likely exaggerating their desires for Columbus to succeed and the reward and recognition he would receive. While it appears that the royal crown desire for Columbus to be successful, they have the hidden biased motives of wanting this victory in exploration for its own benefit and glory. (Doc 1) This idea is also supported in the painting The Landing of Columbus at the Island of Guanahani which portrays Columbus holding the Spanish flag upon arrival to the West Indies, claiming this land for the King and Queen of Spain. This painting depicts the explorers with crosses and flags, showing the viewer exactly what they came to this new land for. (Doc 10) While some were conquering new lands for their country, others also came in the hopes of building a better future for themselves. A life in the New World would also be a new beginning; criminals could now attempt to make a new start for themselves and others could work to move upward in the hierarchical system of life. (Doc 3) The religious motive to convert the Natives to Catholicism was very strong with Spanish explorers and the Catholic Church. On her deathbed, Queen Isabella discussed her desire to fulfill the Spanish Crown’s promise to the Pope to bring the light of Catholicism to the pagan Natives in the dark. Religion was one important factor that influenced Ferdinand and Isabella to promote exploration. (Doc 4) Pope Paul III also expressed his desire to bring Catholicism to the New World. He argued that Natives not only could comprehend the Catholic faith, but also wanted to participate in it. He defended the passionate religious inspiration the Spanish held for conquering Amerindians. His bias in his writing is undeniable. As the leader of the Catholic Church and thus its greatest advocate; it would be expected that the Pope would insert his bias towards Catholicism in his thought on conversion of Amerindians. The Pope wanted Amerindians to become Catholic, and so he reasoned that they could and wanted to do so. (Doc 7) Another crucial motive for European exploration was the prospect of gaining wealth. The New World was abundant in resources that Europeans needed to participate in the global economy. Among the most important of these were gold and the inhabitants of the Americas. The Amerindians themselves proved to be a valuable source of slave labor. Columbus, as described in his writing of his first interactions with Amerindians, formed a relationship with the Natives so that acquiring their resources was easy. He didn’t take advantage of their generosity, but instead founded a friendly relationship so that the Amerindians would be willing to participate in a relationship with the Spanish, in which they worked to give the Spanish the resources they held in abundance, but which Europeans held high demand for. Through using Amerindian slave labor for agriculture and mining, the Spanish showed their undeniable interest in exploiting the New World for its riches. (Doc 2) The attitudes of both Europeans and Natives during the Age of Exploration differed greatly. Natives viewed the European conquerors as a threat to fear and rebel against. While Europeans overwhelmingly saw the Natives as an uneducated people that could be used as a resource to be exploited. However, empathy for the brutalized Natives eventually gained support as a popular attitude. Christopher Columbus first noticed the Natives’ ignorance when they traded valuable items for shards of glass and other meaningless items. Seeing the Natives as naïve, he also assumed they could be easily converted to Catholicism. Columbus thus treated the Natives with kindness at first, so as to easily accomplish his objectives of obtaining the Natives’ New World resources and converting them to Catholicism. (Doc 2) Pope Paul III also wanted to accomplish the goal of religious conversion—not only did he believe that the Natives were able to become Catholic; he also believed it was their will to do so. (Doc 7) The Natives also appeared to be violent savages who attacked Europeans without reason or restraint. This comes from the Natives’ attitudes about the conquering Europeans. Natives had reactions of both violence and fear. In Magellan’s voyage around the World, Amerindians are depicted as barbarians, brutally killing the captain of the ship. As a member of Magellan’s crew, the source, Antonio Pigafetta, was biased because he sought to make Magellan appear the victim, and the natives as savages who attacked without provocation. Therefore, the bias of Pigafetta proves it an unreliable account, as he exaggerated the violence of the fight. In doing this, he cast the natives in a negative light, further enticing the Europeans to believe their tales of barbarians. (Doc 6) Another emerging attitude about the European Age of Exploration was the empathy for Natives; attitudes condemning their brutal treatment. Pope Paul III was so moved by complaints of brutality towards Natives that he addressed the issue in a papal bull in 1537, Ipsa Veritas, officially declaring that Amerindians’ rights to property and liberty shouldn’t be infringed upon. (Doc 9) A similar executive order concerning Natives’ rights was released by King Charles I of Spain in 1542. This feeling of recognition of Amerindians’ rights clearly grew support, but well after the first conquests beginning with Columbus’s discovery in 1492. Another excellent example of this attitude about the Age of Exploration comes from historian and former conquistador Bartolome de Las Casas. His account in Historia de las Indias tells of the horrible cruelty exerted by the Spanish on the Amerindians in their quest for economic and religious achievement. (Doc 8) The varying consequences of the Age of Exploration ultimately propelled Europe into its position of world dominance. The impact of Old World disease on Amerindians weakened their population, which contributed to European dominance in the violence that broke out between explorers and Natives, yet another consequence. What ultimately allowed Europe to enter the global economy with strength was the exploitation of New World resources for trade. The foremost largest consequence of the linking of the Old and New Worlds occurred from the diseases European explorers brought with them. The diseases Europeans brought weren’t extremely deadly in the Old World due to a natural biological resistance. However, the diseases were overwhelmingly fatal for Amerindians who didn’t have biological immunity. Many diseases were transferred to the Americas, the direst of which were typhus, influenza, and smallpox. These diseases had drastic consequences; they resulted in widespread terminal illness, death, and population decrease. Fray Bernardino de Sahagun depicted the unbearable pain and suffering of the Aztec Amerindians from smallpox during Spanish conquistador Hernando Cortes’s invasion. (Doc 5) Violence between Natives and Europeans was another consequence of the discovery of the New World. Natives feared and opposed the arrival of European explorers on their land; retaliation and violent aggression was inevitable. In Antonio Pigafetta’s historical account, Magellan’s Voyage Around the World, he describes his personal encounter with “enemy Natives”, in which the confrontation resulted in the death of Ferdinand Magellan, the leader of the expedition to circumnavigate the globe.