Geological Factors Related to the Transmissivity of the Culebra Dolomite Member, Permian Rustler Formation, Delaware Basin, Southeastern New Mexico

Geological Factors Related to the Transmissivity of the Culebra Dolomite Member, Permian Rustler Formation, Delaware Basin, Southeastern New Mexico

Oklahoma GeologicalSurvey Circular 109,2003 Geological Factors Related to the Transmissivity of the Culebra Dolomite Member, Permian Rustler Formation, Delaware Basin, Southeastern New Mexico Dennis ~ Powers Robert M. Holt Consulting Geologist University of Mississippi Anthony, Texas University, Mississippi Richard L. Beauheim and Sean A. McKenna Sandia National Laboratories Carlsbad, New Mexico ABSTRACT.-The Culebra Dolomite Member of the Permian Rustler Formation in south­ eastern New Mexico has been tested hydraulically at 42 sites, yielding reliable transmissiv­ ity (T) values. The T values show a strong relationship to depth with contributions from two additional factors: dissolution of halite from the upper part of the underlying Salado For­ mation, and distribution ofhalite in the Rustler. Three maps related to these factors improve our understanding ofthe processes involved in creating the T distribution. An elevation map ofthe Culebra shows the general regional eastward dip, which contributes to the depth factor, and two northwest-southeast-trending anticlines. Along the eastern margin of Nash Draw (a closed depression formed by dissolu­ tion and erosion), elevation contours are disrupted where the Culebra subsided as halite was removed from the upper Salado Formation. A map ofthe thickness between the Culebra and an upper Salado unit reveals pronounced decreases identified as the margin ofdissolu­ tion of upper Salado halite. The dissolution margin underlies, and is the apparent control for, the escarpment on the eastern margin of Nash Draw. Rustler halite margins on the third map mainly indicate limits to saline facies tracts; they are also the most likely loca­ tion for any post-depositional dissolution. The geologic data on these maps can be used to develop a quantitative model for predict­ ing Culebra T. The data have also been used to select drilling and hydraulic-testing loca­ tions for an extensive field program, beginning in 2003. INTRODUCTION ers, 1988,2002; Beauheim and Holt, 1990; Powers and The Culebra Dolomite Member ofthe Permian Rus­ Holt, 1993; Holt, 1997), a detailed conceptual hydro­ tler Formation (Fig. 1) in southeastern New Mexico geological model for Culebra T has emerged. Unlike has been intensively studied for nearly 30 years to most geologic units, where heterogeneous hydraulic determine its hydraulic properties. In the vicinity of properties are attributable to depositional variations, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) (Fig. 2), the spatialvariability in Culebra T is primarily due to post­ Culebra has little significance for water production, depositional processes (Holt, 1997). but it is the dominant water-bearing unit above the The Culebra is a fractured dolomite (Holt and Pow­ Salado Formation, where radioactive waste is being ers, 1988), T in the Culebra is primarily due to frac­ stored for the WIPP. Its hydraulic properties are im­ tures, and the amount offracturing has been qualita­ portant parameters for estimating the probability of tively shown to increase from east to west across the release ofradionuclides from the WIPP to the bound­ study area (Holt and Powers, 1988; Beauheim and aries ofthe controlled area over the next 10,000 years. Holt, 1990). Four regional-scale geologic processes In the area of study (Fig. 2), Culebra transmissiv­ have beenpostulated to accountfor the observed varia­ ity (T) varies over at least 6 orders ofmagnitude (e.g., tions. Beauheim and Holt (1990) suggest that fractur­ Beauheim and Ruskauff, 1998). Across the study area, ing from erosion/unloadingprocesses is a primary con­ Culebra T values generally increase from east to west. trol on Culebra T, and Powers and Holt (1995) indi­ Following several studies of Rustler geology as it re­ cate that as much as 600 m ofoverburden might have lates to the hydrology of the Culebra (Holt and Pow- been removed owing to Cenozoic erosion at the WIPP Powers, D. W.; Holt, R. M.; Beauheim, R. L.; and McKenna, S. A., 2003, Geological factors related to the transmissivity of the Culebra Dolomite Member, Permian Rustler Formation, Delaware Basin, southeastern New Mexico, in Johnson, K. S.; and Neal, J. T. (eds.), Evaporite karst and engineering/environmental problems in the United States: Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 109, p. 211-218. 211 212 D. W. Powers and others SYSTEMI Series Formation Members Mescalero CENOZOIC J-c_al_ic_he -t Gatul'ia Dewey Lake Forty-niner Magenta 00/. Rustler Tamarisk Culebra Dol. e:: ~ Los Medaf}os .s:::. 0 0 marker beds 100-116 Z Salado Vaca Triste 5s. Figure 2. General location map of the study area, illustrating ~ important features. :E 0:: w Castile a.. thickness changes across an interval including the coI e:: Rustler-8alado contact (as a means of determining "0co ._co Bell Canyon ::Ia. the margin ofdissolution ofthe upper Salado halite); C>.2 and facies maps showing halite margins for various Rustler Formation members. Culebra overburden Figure 1. General stratigraphic column for the study area, show­ ing formations described in the text. The Culebra Dolomite thickness canbe obtained by subtractinginterpolated Member and the Vaca Triste Sandstone Member are empha­ Culebra elevations from topographic elevations (from sized because they are dominant features of later figures. The digital elevation models) at grid points. Los Medanos Member was named by Powers and Holt (1999) Weart and others (1998) introduce the location, to replace the informal term "unnamed lower member" in com­ function, broad setting, and some of the geological is­ mon use. The scale of this figure does not represent unit thick­ sues relevant to the WIPP for the interested reader. nesses. Part ofour study area includes evaporite karst areas described by Lee (1925); we focus on more specific is­ site. Structural deformation, including gravity foun­ sues in this report. dering ofthe underlying Castile Formation and Ceno­ zoic tilting of the Delaware Basin (Borns and others, DATA AND SOURCES 1983), also might have contributed to Culebra frac­ In the study area or domain, there are three princi­ turing. In the western part of the study area (Nash pal sources of geological data for the Culebra, Rustler Draw), halite from the Salado Formation has been halite units, and upper Salado. These sources are dissolved, further fracturing the Culebra and, in some WIPP-sponsored work, oil and gas drilling, and drill areas, resulting incollapse thatlengthens the Culebra holes for potash deposits. Within the WIPP site, most section (Holt and Powers, 1988; Beauheim and Holt, of the information comes from WIPP-sponsored drill 1990; Powers and Holt, 1995; Holt, 1997). In the east­ holes and shafts (e.g., Holt and Powers, 1990). Cores, ern part of the study area, halite directly underlies cuttings, and geophysical logs are important sources the Culebra (Holt and Powers, 1988). Holt (1997) sug- . of information, but major insights into tij,e geology of gests that halite cements in these areas may limit the Culebra and Rustler have come from shaft obser­ Culebra porosity and T; ground-water-chemistry data vations. Non-WIPP data sources have beeninterpreted also show waters near halite saturation in these ar­ on the basis ofexperience gained through more direct eas (e.g., Beauheim and Holt, 1990). investigation ofthe rocks for WIPP. The second source Here we develop the geological information and data of data is the oil and gas wells drilled in the study for the Culebranecessary to create a geologically based domain. Intensive exploration and development of quantitative model for predicting Culebra T. The prin­ previously overlooked resources, beginning in the late cipal geologic data necessary for this are elevations 1980s, have increased the number of wells with use­ (structure-contour maps) of the top of the Culebra; ful shallow geophysical logs, and this study includes Geological Factors Affecting Culebra Dolomite Transmissivity, Delaware Basin 213 data from about 1,000 such drill holes. Geophysical ,......., -2 Well Interconnected logs from these more recent wells are commonly taken ~ -3 through the casing in the interval of interest to us, e Fractures but the natural gamma log of the Rustler and upper ~ -4 Salado have distinctive signatures that are readily =.. -5 interpreted. The third source of geologic information .-G' -6 > for this study is the data recorded during drilling and .~ coring to establishpotash resources. Stratigraphic and -7 lithologic data reported prior to the 1980s are suffi­ .~ -8 ciently detailed to recognize consistently the impor­ ~ -9 tant stratigraphic units. Recent potash drill-hole re­ Eo-< Halite Bounding bOO -1 0 • Salado Dissolution • / the Culebra ports, however, commonly do not show the Culebra. • No Salado Dissolution To determine the margin of upper Salado dissolution, ....:l -11 L-__-'-__""""-:~-~~-~~-~ the interval from the top of Culebra to the base ofthe o 100 200 300 400 500 Vaca Triste Sandstone Member ofthe Salado Forma­ Depth (m) tion (Fig. 1) was most consistently reported across the Figure 3. Log Culebra transmissivity (T) shows a strong rela­ various data sources. A narrower interval bounding tionship to depth. The lower field ofT values is from test holes the contact would have been preferable but was not without well-interconnected fractures. The upper field is from practical. Rustler halite margins were interpreted on drill holes with well-interconnected fractures and includes the basis of WIPP shafts, cores, and geophysical logs, places where the upper Salado has been dissolved. The low­ and these margins were extended as possible, using est value occurs in a location where the Culebra is underlain by halite in the Los Medanos Member and overlain by halite in open-hole geophysical logs from oil and gas wells and the Tamarisk Member. more detailed potash drill-hole descriptions. Location data for the drill holes are most commonly the township, range, and section locations. For many drill holes, Dave Hughes (Washington TRU Solutions, LLC) provided an electronic data file of New Mexico State Plane (NAD27) locations. State Plane coordi­ nates were converted to UTM metric using Corpscon for Windows (v.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us