Full Disclosure Forms

Full Disclosure Forms

The growing spectrum of antibody-associated inflammatory brain diseases in children Sandra Bigi, MD, MSc* ABSTRACT Manisha Hladio, BSc, Objective: To describe the clinical spectrum, diagnostic evaluation, current management, and MSc* neurologic outcome of pediatric antibody-associated inflammatory brain diseases (AB-associated Marinka Twilt, MD, IBrainD). MSc, PhD Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD #18 years diagnosed with an AB-associated IBrainD at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Susanne M. Benseler, Ontario, Canada, between January 2005 and June 2013. Standardized clinical data, laboratory MD, MSc, PhD test results, neuroimaging features, and treatment regimens were captured. Results: Of 169 children (93 female, 55%) diagnosed with an IBrainD, 16 (10%) had an AB- – Correspondence to associated IBrainD. Median age at presentation was 13.3 years (range 3.1 17.9); 11 (69%) Dr. Bigi: were female. Nine patients (56%) had anti–NMDA receptor encephalitis, 4 (25%) had [email protected] aquaporin-4 autoimmunity, 2 (13%) had Hashimoto encephalitis, and 1 (6%) had anti–glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) encephalitis. The key presenting features in children with anti– NMDA receptor encephalitis, Hashimoto encephalopathy, and anti-GAD65 encephalitis included encephalopathy, behavioral symptoms, and seizures; patients with aquaporin-4 autoimmunity showed characteristic focal neurologic deficits. Six patients (38%) required intensive care unit admission at presentation. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 55 days (range 6–358). All but 1 patient received immunosuppressive therapy. One child with anti–NMDA recep- tor encephalitis died due to multiorgan failure. At last follow-up, after a median follow-up time of 1.7 years (range 0.8–3.7), 27% of the children had function-limiting neurologic sequelae. Conclusions: Children with AB-associated IBrainD represent an increasing subgroup among IBrainD; 1 in 4 children has function-limiting residual neurologic deficits. Awareness of the different clinical patterns is important in order to facilitate timely diagnosis and initiate immu- nosuppressive treatment. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e92; doi: 10.1212/ NXI.0000000000000092 GLOSSARY AB-associated IBrainD 5 antibody-associated inflammatory brain diseases; AQP4 5 aquaporin-4; CRP 5 C-reactive protein; ESR 5 erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FLAIR 5 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; GAD65 5 glutamic acid decar- boxylase 65; IBrainD 5 inflammatory brain diseases; ICU 5 intensive care unit; IgG 5 immunoglobulin G; LETM 5 longitu- dinally extensive transverse myelitis; NMO 5 neuromyelitis optica; ON 5 optic neuritis; PSOM 5 Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure; TPO 5 thyroperoxidase. Inflammatory brain diseases (IBrainD) affect previously healthy children and can cause life- threatening neurologic deficits. The disease spectrum encompasses several distinct entities, including vasculitides, granulomatous conditions, and T cell– and antibody-associated dis- eases.1–5 In antibody-associated inflammatory brain diseases (AB-associated IBrainD), activated Supplemental data at Neurology.org/nn *These authors contributed equally to the manuscript. From the Department of Pediatrics (S.B.), Division of Neurology; Department of Pediatrics (M.H.), Division of Rheumatology; and Department of Emergency Medicine and Research Institute (S.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (S.B.), Division of Child Neurology, University Children’s Hospital, Berne, Switzerland; Department of Pediatric Rheumatology (M.T.), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Catalan Institution of Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA) and Biomedical Research Institute August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) (J.D.), Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (J.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Section of Rheumatology (S.M.B.), Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children’s Hospital, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. Neurology.org/nn © 2015 American Academy of Neurology 1 ª 2015 American Academy of Neurology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. B cells produce specific antibodies against dif- thyroperoxidase (TPO) antibodies, and CSF analysis (cell count, ferent structures in the CNS, including cell protein, oligoclonal bands). Serologies included varicella-zoster virus, hepatitis B and C, enterovirus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 3,6–9 surfaces, synaptic proteins, and channels. cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Bartonella henselae, Despite the growing number of recognized Treponema pallidum,andBorrelia burgdorferi. conditions and the achievements related to tar- A malignancy workup (abdominal ultrasound and/or MRI) geted treatment, the clinical heterogeneity was performed if indicated. Antibody testing was performed prior to treatment initiation within this group often leads to a delay in diag- in all patients. Paired serum/CSF samples were used for anti– nosis and hence a high risk of poor outcomes. NMDA receptor and anti–glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 Therefore, the objectives of this study were (GAD65) antibody testing, as previously described.11 Testing included other cell surface or synaptic receptors (AMPA receptor, to (1) describe the clinical phenotype of dis- GABAA receptor, GABAB receptor, GlyR, mGluR5R, LGI1, tinct childhood AB-associated IBrainD, (2) Caspr2, DPPX). Anti-TPO antibodies were tested in serum at review the diagnostic evaluation and current The Hospital for Sick Children; a titer of .35 IU/L was consid- management, and (3) assess the neurologic ered positive. Neuromyelitis optica (NMO)-IgG was tested in serum and/or CSF using ELISA. All NMO-IgG testing was per- outcome at the last follow-up. formed at the same institution (NMO testing reference center). MRI of the brain and/or spine at presentation was reviewed METHODS Population and setting. This was a single- by 2 independent investigators (S.B., S.M.B.). Lesion location center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients (supratentorial/infratentorial/spinal cord) and enhancement were younger than 18 years of age who were seen at The Hospital recorded. Spinal cord lesions of $3 segments were identified as for Sick Children from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2013, and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM). diagnosed with an IBrainD. Included were patients with a Immunosuppressive treatment included the institutional proto- confirmatory antibody detected in serum and/or CSF (see col (see figures e-1 and e-2, depending on disease severity at onset) testing panel later in this section) in the context of a newly or modified regimens. Symptomatic treatment included manage- acquired neurologic and/or psychiatric deficit not otherwise ment of seizure control and psychotropic agents as indicated. explained with a follow-up period of at least 6 months.10 Excluded were children with non–AB-associated IBrainD or with Outcome. Primary outcome was the neurologic functioning at IBrainD that were presumed to be AB-associated but with no last clinical encounter, defined by the Pediatric Stroke Outcome confirmatory test. All children diagnosed with IBrainD were Measure (PSOM). The PSOM is a standardized and validated followed in the IBrainD and CNS vasculitis clinics at The pediatric outcome measure routinely used in BrainWorks and Hospital for Sick Children. Standardized clinical data, laboratory in the IBrainD clinics. The PSOM categorizes outcome as either test results, neuroimaging features, and outcome information were good (normal function or mild deficit with no impact on func- 12 prospectively collected and captured in a designated research tion) or bad (any deficit affecting function). database (BrainWorks, the international Web-based password- Secondary outcomes included survival, school participation, protected prospective cohort of children with IBrainD). Patients support at school (defined as presence of an individualized educa- were identified from the database and data were supplemented with tion program or other support), and assessment of residual additional information found in the electronic patient charts. seizures. Analysis. Children were assigned to distinct subgroups based on Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient their presenting antibody. For each subgroup, clinical presenta- consents. Written informed consent was obtained from all study tion, inflammatory markers, neuroimaging findings, and out- participants (parents/legal guardians). The study was approved by come measures were captured using descriptive statistics. the research ethics board of The Hospital for Sick Children (REB 1000014279). RESULTS A total of 169 children were diagnosed Clinical data. Information of interest included sex, age at diag- with an IBrainD. Sex distribution was balanced (93 nosis, duration of symptoms before diagnosis, initial clinical pre- female, 55%); the mean age at diagnosis was 9.9 years sentation

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us