Michał Zakrzewski, Linear Multi-Variable Polylogarithms

Michał Zakrzewski, Linear Multi-Variable Polylogarithms

LINEAR MULTI-VARIABLE POLYLOGARITHMS Michał Zakrzewski Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce . [email protected] Będlewo, September 15th, 2015 Plan 1 Introduction Classical theory of polylogarithms and zeta-function Polylogarithm and Euler-Gauss hypergeometric function 2 Multi-variable polylogarithms Motivation. Shintani zeta-function and MZV Multiple zeta values General linear multi-variable polylogarithm 3 Multivariable hypergeometric functions and hypergeometric systems Multivariable hypergeometric functions GKZ systems Mordell-Tornheim GKZ-system Gen. D-K int. Bibliography More generally, the polylogarithmic series of order s is defined by X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1. (2) s ns n>0 As re s > 1, function Lis is well defined on a closure D of the unit disc D and we have Lis (1) = ζ(s), where ζ is the famous Riemann zeta function. Classical polylogarithm The Dilogarithm function X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1, (1) 2 n2 n>0 has been defined and extensively studied by Euler (mainly, but not only, in the article cited below). Euler, L., ”De summatione serierum in hac forma contentarum: a/1 + a2/4 + a3/9 + a4/16 + a5/25 + a6/36+ etc.” Memoires de l’academie des sciences de St.-Petersbourg 3, 1811, pp. 26 - 42. As re s > 1, function Lis is well defined on a closure D of the unit disc D and we have Lis (1) = ζ(s), where ζ is the famous Riemann zeta function. Classical polylogarithm The Dilogarithm function X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1, (1) 2 n2 n>0 has been defined and extensively studied by Euler (mainly, but not only, in the article cited below). More generally, the polylogarithmic series of order s is defined by X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1. (2) s ns n>0 Euler, L., ”De summatione serierum in hac forma contentarum: a/1 + a2/4 + a3/9 + a4/16 + a5/25 + a6/36+ etc.” Memoires de l’academie des sciences de St.-Petersbourg 3, 1811, pp. 26 - 42. Classical polylogarithm The Dilogarithm function X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1, (1) 2 n2 n>0 has been defined and extensively studied by Euler (mainly, but not only, in the article cited below). More generally, the polylogarithmic series of order s is defined by X tn Li (t) := , |t| < 1. (2) s ns n>0 As re s > 1, function Lis is well defined on a closure D of the unit disc D and we have Lis (1) = ζ(s), where ζ is the famous Riemann zeta function. Euler, L., ”De summatione serierum in hac forma contentarum: a/1 + a2/4 + a3/9 + a4/16 + a5/25 + a6/36+ etc.” Memoires de l’academie des sciences de St.-Petersbourg 3, 1811, pp. 26 - 42. Operator θt λ satisfies the eigen-equation (θt − λ)t = 0. A power series and a Mellin transformation are spectral decompositions w. r. t. eigen-equation of θ. It follows, that the polylogarithmic function satisfies differential equation t θs Li (t) = , |t| < 1 (3) s 1 − t or, equivalently, s−1 (1 − t)∂t θt Lis (t) = 1, |t| < 1. (4) This differential equation, (3) or (4), can be engaged to analiticaly 1 continue Lis on C\{0, 1}, i.e. CP \{0, 1, ∞}. Classical polylogarithm. Differential equation Let ∂t := ∂/∂t and θ = θt = t∂t - the Euler operator. A power series and a Mellin transformation are spectral decompositions w. r. t. eigen-equation of θ. It follows, that the polylogarithmic function satisfies differential equation t θs Li (t) = , |t| < 1 (3) s 1 − t or, equivalently, s−1 (1 − t)∂t θt Lis (t) = 1, |t| < 1. (4) This differential equation, (3) or (4), can be engaged to analiticaly 1 continue Lis on C\{0, 1}, i.e. CP \{0, 1, ∞}. Classical polylogarithm. Differential equation Let ∂t := ∂/∂t and θ = θt = t∂t - the Euler operator. Operator θt λ satisfies the eigen-equation (θt − λ)t = 0. It follows, that the polylogarithmic function satisfies differential equation t θs Li (t) = , |t| < 1 (3) s 1 − t or, equivalently, s−1 (1 − t)∂t θt Lis (t) = 1, |t| < 1. (4) This differential equation, (3) or (4), can be engaged to analiticaly 1 continue Lis on C\{0, 1}, i.e. CP \{0, 1, ∞}. Classical polylogarithm. Differential equation Let ∂t := ∂/∂t and θ = θt = t∂t - the Euler operator. Operator θt λ satisfies the eigen-equation (θt − λ)t = 0. A power series and a Mellin transformation are spectral decompositions w. r. t. eigen-equation of θ. This differential equation, (3) or (4), can be engaged to analiticaly 1 continue Lis on C\{0, 1}, i.e. CP \{0, 1, ∞}. Classical polylogarithm. Differential equation Let ∂t := ∂/∂t and θ = θt = t∂t - the Euler operator. Operator θt λ satisfies the eigen-equation (θt − λ)t = 0. A power series and a Mellin transformation are spectral decompositions w. r. t. eigen-equation of θ. It follows, that the polylogarithmic function satisfies differential equation t θs Li (t) = , |t| < 1 (3) s 1 − t or, equivalently, s−1 (1 − t)∂t θt Lis (t) = 1, |t| < 1. (4) Classical polylogarithm. Differential equation Let ∂t := ∂/∂t and θ = θt = t∂t - the Euler operator. Operator θt λ satisfies the eigen-equation (θt − λ)t = 0. A power series and a Mellin transformation are spectral decompositions w. r. t. eigen-equation of θ. It follows, that the polylogarithmic function satisfies differential equation t θs Li (t) = , |t| < 1 (3) s 1 − t or, equivalently, s−1 (1 − t)∂t θt Lis (t) = 1, |t| < 1. (4) This differential equation, (3) or (4), can be engaged to analiticaly 1 continue Lis on C\{0, 1}, i.e. CP \{0, 1, ∞}. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ. This leads to the integral representation t Li (t) = T s . (5) s 1 − t The domain of integration is the simplex in Rs . This is the simplest Drinfeld-Kontsevich integral. It will be introduced explicitly in the latter part of this talk. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ. This leads to the integral representation t Li (t) = T s . (5) s 1 − t The domain of integration is the simplex in Rs . This is the simplest Drinfeld-Kontsevich integral. It will be introduced explicitly in the latter part of this talk. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. This leads to the integral representation t Li (t) = T s . (5) s 1 − t The domain of integration is the simplex in Rs . This is the simplest Drinfeld-Kontsevich integral. It will be introduced explicitly in the latter part of this talk. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ. The domain of integration is the simplex in Rs . This is the simplest Drinfeld-Kontsevich integral. It will be introduced explicitly in the latter part of this talk. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ. This leads to the integral representation t Li (t) = T s . (5) s 1 − t It will be introduced explicitly in the latter part of this talk. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ. This leads to the integral representation t Li (t) = T s . (5) s 1 − t The domain of integration is the simplex in Rs . This is the simplest Drinfeld-Kontsevich integral. Classical polylogarithm. Integral R t Define the operator T as follows. Let Tf (t) := 0 f (τ)/τdτ, on tC[t]. In more general context, we understand T as a linear extension of the above oerator. Sometimes it will be convenient to look at T in the context of formal series C[[tp]] in some power of the free variable. We have θTf = f , so we can regard T as a (right) inverse of θ.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    127 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us