Sovereignty, Socialism and Development in Postcolonial Tanzania

Sovereignty, Socialism and Development in Postcolonial Tanzania

Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien. / Vienna Journal of African Studies. No. 31/2016, Vol. 16, 109-126. doi: 10.25365/phaidra.265_05 Review Article Sovereignty, Socialism and Development in Postcolonial Tanzania Eric Burton BJERK, Paul. 2015. Building a Peaceful Nation. Julius Nyerere and the Establishment of Sovereignty in Tanzania, 1960-1964. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. 374 pp. ISBN: 978-1580465052. GREEN, Maia. 2014. The Development State. Aid, Culture and Civil Society in Tanzania, Woodbridge: James Currey. 217pp. ISBN: 978- 1847011084. LAL, Priya. 2015. African Socialism in Postcolonial Tanzania. Between the Village and the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 278 pp. ISBN: 978-1107104525. SCHNEIDER, Leander. 2014. Government of Development. Peasants and Politicians in Postcolonial Tanzania, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 234 pp. ISBN: 978-0253013996. John Magufuli, Tanzania’s President since November 2015, has reminded some observers in the media and social networks of the country’s first President and revered Baba wa Taifa (“Father of the Nation”), Julius Nyerere. Nyerere ruled the country from independence until 1985 and tried, over two decades, to lead Tanzania to socialism and self-reliance. Two decades after Nyerere stepped down, following structural adjustment and reforms of mostly neoliberal orientation between 1986 and 2015, the new president draws – consciously, but selectively – on the past. A central figure in the © 2016 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is provided, and it is indicated which changes were made. 110 Stichproben repertoire is the figure of Nyerere, who has become “a widely shared political metaphor used to debate and contest conceptions of the Tanzanian nation and Tanzanian-ness” (Fouéré 2015). Much like the incorruptible Nyerere, Magufuli has successfully nurtured an image of embracing hard work, austerity and efficiency. His hands-on- attitude is reflected in a crackdown on tax evaders and the speedy dismissal of corrupt civil servants in the name of public interests. Critical voices from the Tanzanian opposition as well as national and international media, however, have pointed out that in the first year of his regency, Magufuli has displayed worrying authoritarian tendencies (for instance, Kabwe 2016). The “Bulldozer,” as he is nicknamed, devised means to silence the opposition, muzzled three newspapers and two radio stations, and charged at least ten people under a new law on cybercrime for insulting the president on social media (as of September 2016, see Kuo 2016). The display of political power, which meets with both applause and distrust of the Tanzanian public, goes hand in hand with several protectionist measures meant to catalyse economic growth, some of which recall Nyerere’s vision of self-reliance. It is not only for such distorted echoes of the past, but for a plethora of reasons that Tanzania’s postcolonial history has continued to attract scholars. While some scholars have emphasized continuity and praise Tanzania as shining example of political stability since independence – the ruling party has been in power for 55 years now, managing the transition from one-party rule to multi-party democracy – others have highlighted ruptures and the exceptionality of the socialist Ujamaa period. Ujamaa has been hailed for being an internationally influential, egalitarian, anti-racist, vision of modernity, though its results were mixed, at best. It has also been dismissed as a misconceived, authoritarian, economically devastating and ultimately failed experiment which precipitated the malaise of the 1980s and the transformation to multi-party democracy. Four recent monographs about Tanzania after 1960 enrich the existing literature with new perspectives on scales from household and village conflicts to global struggles, leaving the reader with a wide choice between narratives of success and failure, stability and fragmentation, authoritarianism and emancipation. Review Article: Postcolonial Tanzania 111 The Establishment of Sovereignty In Building a Peaceful Nation, Paul Bjerk asks how Tanzania’s leaders, facing a plethora of destabilizing influences similar to those that befell most African states after independence, managed to forge a stable, sovereign state in the years between 1960 and 1964. Bjerk’s narrative is a story of success, an “Afro-optimist” account pitted against the “Afro-pessimist” mainstream opinion of failed states and corrupt elites in Africa. By means of “discursive agency”, Bjerk claims, Julius Nyerere and a handful of other high-ranking politicians including Rashidi Kawawa and Oscar Kambona creatively, competently, responsibly and successfully balanced political demands from pressure groups in the country and avoided the cliffs in riding with the tides of the global Cold War. The first part of the book sketches the biographical trajectory of Nyerere as a young man. Bjerk outlines how Nyerere’s political thinking was shaped by his upbringing and education in Tanganyika and Edinburgh (Scotland), drawing attention to the fact that the tension between efficient autocracy and consensus-oriented democracy which was to mark his presidency already bedevilled him as a young intellectual. Falling short of a real biography – Tom Molony recently published a much more detailed account with his Nyerere. The Early Years – this section introduces the monograph’s main protagonist. Doing this, it serves as a kind of prelude to the two major parts of the book which deal with the construction of internal and external sovereignty. The part on internal sovereignty shows how Nyerere and his allies registered victories in containing crises. The most serious of these was the 1964 mutiny of the Tanganyika Rifles of which Bjerk provides the most detailed account so far, presenting the unfolding of events on a day-to-day basis. The government also averted pressure from fellow party members, the rivalling ANC and large sections of the labour movement for a racialisation of recruitment policies under the slogan of “Africa for Africans.” Bjerk convincingly argues that the mutiny was a welcome pretext for the leadership to disband the popular and influential union movement. The reader also learns more about the role of two other institutions that have received too little scholarly attention so far, namely the TANU Youth 112 Stichproben League and the National Service, also called JKT (Jeshi la Kujenga Taifa, literally, Nation-building Army). Both institutions instilled discipline and a patriotic habitus, meant to tie the nation’s youth closer to the party and the state. Yet, members of the TANU Youth League not only served as auxiliaries and arms of the political elite, but also followed their own, more radical agendas when they policed communities, raided Asians’ shops and arrested persons, acting as a de facto executive (Bjerk 2015: 164). Somewhat surprisingly and certainly long overdue in political histories of (postcolonial) African states, Bjerk makes use of ethnographic studies about age-set rule, rites of passage and patronage to illuminate power structures in postcolonial Tanzania. The results of this move are uneven. His resort to cultural continuities and re-workings is fertile and well-argued in the case of the postulated link between “traditional” relations of youth, governance, and gerontocratic patronage on the one hand and “modern” youth organisations such as the TANU Youth League and the National Service on the other hand; it remains on a more superficial level where he discusses labour and land. The second major part of the book investigates Tanganyikas’s manoeuvres in the international sphere. Here, Bjerk documents TANU’s early commitment to promote an explicitly Pan-African liberation struggle which took off with the establishment of PAFMECA (Pan-African Freedom Movement of East and Central Africa) in 1958. He argues that this commitment was based on ideals, but, in strategic terms, can only be interpreted as realist, as the threat of white minority regimes and Portuguese colonialism was all too real. Strategic realism, Bjerk maintains, also marked Nyerere’s plans for regional integration, the diversification of international political bonds and the support for liberation movements. In 1962, Dar es Salaam became the seat of the OAU’s Liberation Committee and Tanganyika strengthened its function as a hub for Chinese and East European military aid and a springboard for freedom fighters’ deployment to military training camps in Cuba, China or Algeria. By drawing attention to the early years of the support for liberation movements, Building a Peaceful Nation delivers proof that the foreign policy strategy of diversification was well in place before the major crises in foreign relations with the US, UK and West Germany occurred in 1964-65. Finally, Bjerk also offers an account of the Review Article: Postcolonial Tanzania 113 birth of the Union between Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964 which he interprets as a quick-witted move of Nyerere to avoid superpower interference. This narrative is solid, but marred by an almost exclusive reliance on British and American sources; also, despite some new details, it adds little to the literature on this topic (Sanders

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us