The Onset of Neoglaciation in Iceland and the 4.2 Ka Event

The Onset of Neoglaciation in Iceland and the 4.2 Ka Event

Clim. Past, 15, 25–40, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-25-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The onset of neoglaciation in Iceland and the 4.2 ka event Áslaug Geirsdóttir1, Gifford H. Miller1,2, John T. Andrews2, David J. Harning1,2, Leif S. Anderson1,3, Christopher Florian2, Darren J. Larsen4, and Thor Thordarson1 1Faculty of Earth Science, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland 2INSTAAR/Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA 3Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada 4Department of Geology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, USA Correspondence: Áslaug Geirsdóttir ([email protected]) Received: 29 September 2018 – Discussion started: 5 October 2018 Accepted: 18 December 2018 – Published: 8 January 2019 Abstract. Strong similarities in Holocene climate recon- occurred between 4.5 and 4.0 ka, with a second abrupt expan- structions derived from multiple proxies (BSi, TOC – to- sion ∼ 3 ka. Due to its coastal setting and lower topographic tal organic carbon, δ13C, C=N, MS – magnetic suscepti- threshold, the initial appearance of Drangajökull in the NW bility, δ15N) preserved in sediments from both glacial and of Iceland was delayed until ∼ 2:3 ka. All lake records reflect non-glacial lakes across Iceland indicate a relatively warm abrupt summer temperature and catchment disturbance at ∼ early to mid Holocene from 10 to 6 ka, overprinted with 4:5 ka, statistically indistinguishable from the global 4.2 ka cold excursions presumably related to meltwater impact on event, and a second widespread abrupt disturbance at 3.0 ka, North Atlantic circulation until 7.9 ka. Sediment in lakes similar to the stepwise expansion of Langjökull and northeast from glacial catchments indicates their catchments were ice- Vatnajökull. Both are intervals characterized by large explo- free during this interval. Statistical treatment of the high- sive volcanism and tephra distribution in Iceland resulting in resolution multi-proxy paleoclimate lake records shows that intensified local soil erosion. The most widespread increase despite great variability in catchment characteristics, the sed- in glacier advance, landscape instability, and soil erosion oc- iment records document more or less synchronous abrupt, curred shortly after 2 ka, likely due to a complex combina- cold departures as opposed to the smoothly decreasing trend tion of increased impact from volcanic tephra deposition, in Northern Hemisphere summer insolation. Although all cooling climate, and increased sea ice off the coast of Ice- lake records document a decline in summer temperature land. All lake records indicate a strong decline in temper- through the Holocene consistent with the regular decline in ature ∼ 1:5 ka, which culminated during the Little Ice Age summer insolation, the onset of significant summer cool- (1250–1850 CE) when the glaciers reached their maximum ing occurs ∼ 5 ka at high-elevation interior sites but is vari- Holocene dimensions. ably later at sites closer to the coast, suggesting that prox- imity to the sea may modulate the impact from decreasing summer insolation. The timing of glacier inception during 1 Introduction the mid Holocene is determined by the descent of the equi- librium line altitude (ELA), which is dominated by the evolu- A growing number of proxy-based climate reconstructions tion of summer temperature as summer insolation declined as provide essential information for understanding the patterns well as changes in sea surface temperature for coastal glacial and mechanisms behind millennial-to-centennial-scale cli- systems. The glacial response to the ELA decline is also mate variability during the Holocene epoch. Most Northern highly dependent on the local topography. The initial ∼ 5 ka Hemisphere reconstructions illustrate warmer-than-present nucleation of Langjökull in the highlands of Iceland defines conditions during the Holocene thermal maximum (HTM; the onset of neoglaciation in Iceland. Subsequently, a step- 11–6 ka) but display spatiotemporal heterogeneity. For exam- wise expansion of both Langjökull and northeast Vatnajökull ple, the HTM in the northern North Atlantic may have been Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 26 Á. Geirsdóttir et al.: The onset of neoglaciation in Iceland and the 4.2 ka event delayed by up to 3000 years compared to the western Arctic tions from two high-resolution lake sediment records in Ice- (Kaufman et al., 2004). This asynchrony has been attributed land show that summertime cooling during the Holocene had to the lingering effects of the residual Laurentide Ice Sheet commenced by ∼ 5 ka (Geirsdóttir et al., 2013). This cool- (LIS) and the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS), which affected sur- ing was likely intensified by lower sea surface temperatures face energy balances and impacted ocean circulation due to around Iceland and increased export of Arctic Ocean sea ice variable meltwater fluxes (Barber et al., 1999; Renssen et resulting in renewed glacier nucleation in the mid Holocene al., 2009, 2010; Blaschek and Renssen, 2013; Marcott et (Geirsdóttir et al., 2009a; Larsen et al., 2012; Cabedo-Sanz al., 2013; Sejrup et al., 2016). Although the primary forc- et al., 2016). The high-resolution lacustrine records indicate ing of the Northern Hemisphere’s subsequent cooling was that, despite the monotonic decline in summer insolation, the spatially uniform decline in summer insolation (Berger Iceland’s landscape changes and ice cap expansions were and Loutre, 1991), orbital forcing also led to nonuniform nonlinear with abrupt changes occurring ∼ 5:0, ∼ 4:5–4.0, changes within the climate system (e.g., Wanner et al., 2008). ∼ 3:0, and ∼ 1:5 ka (Geirsdóttir et al., 2013), with Iceland’s On decadal to multi-centennial timescales, Holocene climate ice caps reaching maximum dimensions during the Little Ice variability is linked to forcing factors such as solar activ- Age (LIA, ∼ 1250–1850 CE; Larsen et al., 2015, Harning et ity and large tropical volcanic eruptions, in addition to cou- al., 2016b; Anderson et al., 2018). In order to understand pled modes of internal variability such as the North Atlantic the nonlinear pattern and stepped environmental and climate Oscillation (NAO), and changes in the Atlantic Meridional changes in Iceland after the HTM and how regional temper- Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and its capacity to trans- atures evolved in terms of timing, magnitude, and glacier in- port heat in the North Atlantic. Feedbacks between ocean, ception, we focus specifically on the climate steps between atmosphere, sea ice, and vegetation changes also complicate 6.0 and 3.0 ka. This time interval includes the 4.2 ka arid- the global response to primary insolation forcing and result ification and cooling event recognized at many global loca- in nonlinear climate variability (Trouet et al., 2009; Miller tions. We place the 4.2 ka event in the context of our Icelandic et al., 2012; Lehner et al., 2013; Moreno-Chamarro et al., Holocene climate reconstruction and knowledge of large Ice- 2017). landic volcanic eruptions as a way of judging if it is indeed a A recent synthesis showed that a general trend of mid major climate event. Holocene glacier growth in the Northern Hemisphere was This paper composites six different normalized climate a response to declining summer temperatures driven by the proxies (i.e., mean D 0 ± 1) in high sedimentation-rate cores orbitally controlled reduction in summer insolation (Solom- from seven lakes in Iceland. Here, we add five new sediment ina et al., 2015). However, spatially divided compilations records to the original two-lake composite of Geirsdóttir et based on the Arctic Holocene Transitions (AHT) database al. (2013) to more effectively evaluate whether individual (Sundquist et al., 2014) indicate heterogeneous responses to site-specific proxy records reflect regional climate changes or the cooling between Arctic regions (Briner et al., 2016; Kauf- catchment-specific processes that are less directly coupled to man et al., 2016; Sejrup et al., 2016). The response of the climate. We employ a statistical comparison of our proxy re- northern North Atlantic region is considered to be partic- constructions from the seven lakes to quantitatively evaluate ularly complex. Records from this region show a strongly their between-lake correlation over time and, by inference, uniform pattern of sea surface and terrestrial summer tem- their utility as proxies for regional climate. perature responses to changes in summer insolation but also signatures of subregional differences that were apparently re- 2 Study sites lated to both the strong influence of the LIS’s disintegration and meltwater discharge in the early Holocene and the vari- The temperature and precipitation gradients across Iceland ability in AMOC strength throughout the remainder of the reflect the island’s position between cold sea surface cur- Holocene (Sejrup et al., 2016). rents from the Arctic and warmer, saltier sea surface cur- Iceland lies in the northern North Atlantic, a region rents from lower latitudes delivered by discrete limbs of the strongly affected by the northward heat transport of AMOC AMOC (Fig. 1). Consequently, climate perturbations that al- (Fig. 1), and within the periphery of the strongest contempo- ter the strength, temperature, and/or latitudinal position of rary warming (Overland et al., 2016). Paleoclimate research these currents should translate

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us