Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail #7014-0150-0001-2587-0812 On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management .................................................................................. 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................. 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .............................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management ................................................................................. 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Baseline Determination .............................................................................................................. 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ...................................................... 11 C. Failure to distinguish between official system routes and other routes is in violation of the Standard Consultation Protocol for Travel Management Route Designation Developed Pursuant to Stipulation IV.A. of the Region 3 First Amended Programmatic Agreement Regarding Historic Property Protection and Responsibilities. .......................................................................................... 13 D. Failure to distinguish between official system routes and other routes present on the ground prevents environmental impacts from being fully disclosed or discussed within the DEIS. ................. 13 VIII. Discarding the Travel Analysis Process Report is Arbitrary and Capricious ....................... 15 IX. Route Evaluation Tree ............................................................................................................. 18 X. Alternative Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 19 A. “CBD” Alternative ..................................................................................................................... 19 B. Need for Additional Alternatives ................................................................................................ 20 XI. Permit Zones ............................................................................................................................ 21 XII. Cross-Country “OHV Areas” .................................................................................................. 23 XIII. Motorized Big Game Retrieval ................................................................................................ 25 XIV. Motorized Dispersed Camping ............................................................................................ 27 XV. Designation of Unauthorized Routes ....................................................................................... 27 XVI. Enforcement ......................................................................................................................... 28 XVII. Transportation Facilities - Maintenance ............................................................................. 30 XVIII. User Conflict and Recreation Opportunities ....................................................................... 31 XIX. Wildlife and Plant Impacts .................................................................................................. 33 A. Riparian Habitat ......................................................................................................................... 34 2 Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan – 09/15/2014 B. Road Density ............................................................................................................................. 34 C. Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................................... 35 XX. Wilderness Areas ..................................................................................................................... 41 XXI. Wild and Scenic Rivers ........................................................................................................ 44 A. Legal Requirements ................................................................................................................... 44 B. Verde Wild and Scenic River ..................................................................................................... 45 C. Eligible Wild and Scenic Rivers ................................................................................................. 46 XXII. Inventoried Roadless Areas (“IRAs”).................................................................................. 47 XXIII. Special Management Areas .................................................................................................. 49 XXIV. Water/Hydrological Resources ............................................................................................ 50 XXV. Visual Resources .................................................................................................................. 50 XXVI. Heritage Resources ............................................................................................................... 51 XXVII. Noxious/Invasive Weeds ................................................................................................... 53 XXVIII. Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 53 A. The Analysis Does Not Comply with NEPA .............................................................................. 53 B. Cumulative Effects are Not Adequately Analyzed ...................................................................... 54 C. The Air Quality Specialist Report appears to be rather outdated ................................................. 56 D. The Information Used in the Analysis is Inconsistent ................................................................. 56 E. Health and Wildlife Impacts Are Not Adequately Analyzed nor Addressed ................................ 57 F. None of the Alternatives Complies with the TNF LRMP ............................................................ 60 XXIX. Climate Change .................................................................................................................... 61 XXX. Specific Routes/Areas Recommendations ............................................................................ 61 XXXI. Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................... 67 A. Payson RD OHV Project ............................................................................................................ 67 B. Illegal Activities ........................................................................................................................ 68 XXXII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 68 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................... 70 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... 72 3 Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan – 09/15/2014 I. Introduction Thank you for providing the opportunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“DEIS”) for the Tonto National Forest’s (“TNF”) ongoing travel management planning process. We appreciate the TNF’s commitment to ensuring public input throughout this process. The following comments are submitted on behalf of all members of our collective organizations who care deeply about our National Forests and are concerned about management of motorized vehicles on these forests. The following organizations endorse and support these comments: For the past thirty years, Archaeology Southwest, a non-profit organization based in Tucson, has been dedicated to exploring and protecting the places of the past. Archaeology Southwest has practiced a holistic, conservation-based approach that we call Preservation Archaeology. By exploring what makes a place special, sharing this knowledge in innovative ways, and enacting flexible site protection strategies, we foster meaningful connections to the past and respectfully safeguard irreplaceable cultural resources. The Center for Biological Diversity is a non-profit public service organization with more than 775,000 members and online activists dedicated to conservation and recovery of at-risk fauna and flora, including those occurring on the Tonto National Forest. It has long-standing interests in travel management on forest lands throughout the Southwest, especially as that management affects