DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 552 UD 035 345 AUTHOR Walsh, Mark; Gehring, John; Gewertz, Catherine; Zehr, Mary Ann; Robelen, Eric W. TITLE The Voucher Decision: Charting the New Landscape of School Choice. INSTITUTION Editorial Projects in Education, Bethesda, MD. PUB DATE 2002-07-10 NOTE 43p.; Theme issue. Published weekly. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.edweek.org/ew/newstory.cfm? slug=42vouch_home.h21. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) Reports Descriptive (141) JOURNAL CIT Education Week; v21 n42 July 10, 2002 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS. Advocacy; Catholic Schools; *Court Litigation; *Educational Vouchers; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation; Private Schools; *School Choice; State Legislation IDENTIFIERS *Cleveland Public Schools OH; Supreme Court ABSTRACT These articles highlight reactions to the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling upholding the Cleveland voucher program. "Justices Settle Case, Nettle Policy Debate" (Mark Walsh) discusses how the ruling has rejuvenated the school choice movement and reinvigorated debates over how best to improve education for all students. "Voucher Battles Head to State Capitals" (John Gehring) explains that the foundation has been laid for new legislative battles over school vouchers in state capitals nationwide. "A Great Day, or Dark One, for Schools?" (Catherine Gewertz) discusses how advocacy groups of all types reacted to the ruling. "Advocates' Post-Ruling Choice: Bubbly" (Mark Walsh) notes that voucher crusaders greeted the ruling with joy. "Catholics Laud Voucher Decision, See Potential for Growth" (Mary Ann Zehr) explains that the most ebullient response to the ruling came from educators at religious schools already participating in voucher programs. "Ruling Gives Second Wind to Capitol Hill Voucher Advocates" (Erik W. Robelen) notes that action quickly shifted to Capitol Hill after the ruling was announced. "A Long Road to the Court" examines mileposts on the way to the court's ruling. "In the Court's Words" presents excerpts from majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court decision in Zelmon v. Simmons-Harris. (SM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ;10/02 -- The Voucher Decision:Charting the New Landscape<br> Of School Choice Education Week 10/16/02 2:58 PM N U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement n 'Education Week EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION O CENTER (ERIC) tThis document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization q American Education's Newspaperof Record originating it. 4-1 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this July 10, 2002 document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. The Voucher Decision: PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS Charting the New Landscape BEEN GRANTED BY Of School Choice Poi( t/o Ectu*o_on TO THE EDUCATIONAL E 0 Education Week INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling upholding the Cleveland voucher program has reverberated around the nation, reigniting the debate on how best to improve the education of all schoolchildren. Our comprehensive coverage examines reactions and possible aftereffects. Justices Settle Case, Nettle Policy Debate The Vouchei' Decision: The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling upholding the Charting the New Landscape Cleveland voucher program has rejuvenated the school Df Schooi Choice choice movement and, to a surprising degree, reinvigorated the debate over how best to improve the Justices Settle C,3:i.c.:,, education of all the nation's schoolchildren. Nettle Policy C.lebale Voucher Battles Head to State Capitals Voucher Bathf H-aci To State C'apital.s The foundation has been laid for a new round of legislative battles over school vouchers in state capitals from coast A Great Day, or Darkno, to coast. Includes a table, "Vouchers on the Ballot." For Schools? Advecateit'F'' nLRulino A Great Day, or Dark One, for Schools? Choice: Bubb The U.S. Supreme Court's June 27 ruling reverberated around the nation. Within minutes, advocacy groups of all Catholics Laud \fouchor stripes were issuing statements proclaiming it a great or a Decision, See Potential dark day for education. Parents and educators were For Growth celebrating, or resigning themselves to uneasy coexistence RolIng Gives. Second or renewed opposition. Includes "Editorial Comment," a V,Iind to Capitol Hill sample of newspaper editorials. Voucher Advocates Chronology: A Long Road Advocates' Post-Ruling Choice: Bubbly To Court Voucher crusaders greet win with popping corks; opponent says next step could be more difficult. in the Cou "Plords IllStory Index Catholics'Laud Voucher Decision, See Potential for Growth The most ebullient response to the Supreme Court's June 27 decision came from educators at religious schools that already participate in voucher programs. But people of faith are anything but http://www.edweek.orglewlew_printstory.cfm?slug---42vouch_home.h2 I 2 Page 1 of 2 AFi BEST COPYlJ17UAOL LE 7/10/02 -- The Voucher Decision:Charting the New Landscape<br> Of School Choice -- Education Week 10/16/02 2:58 PM lockstep in their reaction. Ruling Gives Second Wind To Capitol Hill Voucher Advocates The hubbub outside the U.S. Supreme Court building had barely died down late last month before the action shifted to the big white dome across Capitol Hill's First Street. A Long Road to the Court A look at some mileposts on the way to the Court's June 27 ruling. In the Court's Words Excerpts from majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zelmon v. Simmons-Harris. © 2002 Editorial Projectsin Education Vol. 21, number 42, page Web only http://www.edweek.org/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=42vouch_home.h21 3 Page 2 of 2 7/10/02 -- Justices Settle Case, Nettle Policy Debate --Education Week 10/17/02 10:46 AM Education Week American Education's Newspaper of Record July 10, 2002 Justfices Settle Case, Nettle P licy Debate By Mark Walsh Education Week Washington The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling upholding the Cleveland voucher program has rejuvenated the school choice movement and, to a surprising degree, reinvigorated the debate over how best to improve the education of all the nation's schoolchildren. The decision was perhaps the biggest advance yet for a The Voucher Decision: movement that embraces not only vouchers, but also an Charting the New Landscape assortment of new arrangements in public education, Of School Choice among them charter schools, corporate management of public schools, open enrollment, and other alternatives to Justices Settle Case, traditional schools. MI Netti.- e Policy Debate Voucher Sallies Head "I got many calls yesterday from parents who were To Stele Capital interested not just in vouchers, but other forms of choice," Virginia Walden-Ford, the executive director of D.C. A Great Day, or Dark Ono.,. Parents for School Choice, a local group here, said the Ear .Sr.:ols? day after the court's ruling. "Every parent said, 'We won.' Acivecos' Post-Ruhr-1 Choc.:.: Bubbly That win, specifically, meant the high court's validation by a 5-4 vote of a program that offers low-income Cleveland Cathoties Laud Voucher families tuition aid for religious as well as secular private Decis:ork, See Potential For Growth schools. Those vouchers, the court decided, do not violate the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against a government R ling Gives Second establishment of religion. The program, the court majority Wined, to Capitol Hill said, is one "of true private choice." Voucher Advocates. C A LonRoad. Milton Friedman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist who To Court first proposed a universal system of educational vouchers in a 1955 academic article, praised the June 27 decision as in the Court's Words removing a major legal impediment that has restrained the Story Index idea for decades. "We are more and more approaching the tipping point" for the acceptance of vouchers, Mr. Friedman, who will turn 90 later this month, said in an interview last week. "The very act of removing this obstacle is a great step forward." President Bush, for much of his 17 months in office only a quiet supporter of vouchers, suddenly http://www.edweek.org/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=42vouchmain.h21 BESTCOPYAVAll Page 1 of 6 4 LABLE 7/10/02 -- Justices Settle Case, Nettle Policy Debate --Education Week 10/17/02 10:46 AM regained his voice on the subject last week, calling the ruling "just as historic" as the court's 1954 decision outlawing segregation in education. But opponents were quick to contend that many bathers, both legal and political, would prevent vouchers from expanding far beyond the government-supported programs that now exist in varying forms in Ohio, Wisconsin, Florida, Maine, and Vermont. "Where do we go from here?" said Robert H. Chanin, the general counsel of the National Education Association, who argued against the Cleveland voucher program in the Supreme Court. "This does not end the legal battle. It simply means we no longer have the establishment clause [of the First Amendment] in our legal arsenal." He said voucher programs in many states could still be attacked on the basis of state constitutional language that more explicitly bars state aid to religious institutions than the First Amendment does. And the state courts would be only one arena for battling vouchers, Mr. Chanin added. "The first line of defense has always been political," Mr. Chanin said. "The fact that five justices approved of the idea does not mean it's good." No Dramatic Break The court issued its long-awaited decision in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (Case No. 00-1751) on the last formal day of its 2001-02 term. Chief Justice William H.