April 2, 2009 Agenda the End of Cosmology? Expanding Universe

April 2, 2009 Agenda the End of Cosmology? Expanding Universe

Agenda • Announce: – Observation 8pm on Tuesday, April 21 April 2, 2009 – Project Part IIs Due This Tuesday (4/7) – Solar Altitude Writeup Due April 14 – Read Essay 3 for Tuesday • Krauss’ article: The End of Cosmology? • Review astroparticle/cosmological physics • Dark Matter Lab The End of Cosmology? Expanding Universe • Expansion is speeding up • Krauss, author of “The Physics of Star – Dark energy overpowers gravity Trek” – Density of regular matter decreases – Density of dark energy remains constant! • What will future cosmologists see? • In 100 billion years: – CMBR redshifted to radio with little intensity…probably not – Important to consider limitations in time as observable well as space – Big Bang Nucleosynthesis obscured by stellar production of heavy elements – Erroneous conclusions could come from – Local galaxies merge, rest disappear beyond cosmic horizon forgetting that (such as that we are at the • Conclusions: – Future cosmologists won’t be able to deduce Big Bang center of the universe) – Present cosmologists may be seriously handicapped by some similar type of obscuration Alternative to Inflation: Ekpyrotic Status of these ideas Universe • Idea • Two “branes” collide – Fairly general and often wild idea – Yet to be “molded” to fit existing observations – Offers possible explanation of some mystery or explains something possibly better than • Branes are 3D and move in another existing theories • Proposed theory dimension – Fits with current observations – Working out predictions • Flatness: branes would settle in low • Competing Model – Explains current data, has proposed future tests energy state which would be flat – Often has features that aren’t “liked” – Not definitive • Baryogenesis: brane’s kinetic energy • Well accepted theory – Explains current, has made predictions and passed would create particles ala the Big Bang – Generally accepted, though often limited in scope • Standard Model – Fits current and passes predictions • Structure formation: branes collide at – Typical research looks at the limits where it may fail slightly different times in different places – Atypial research looks to overthrow completely but very difficult 1 Role of Detectors Fundamental Physics • Limited in energy, but repeatable • Conflict of gravity and quantum mechanics • Tests possible GUT theories • Both pass every test we’ve constructed • Search for unknown particles…wide-range • But, they disagree for very dense small of implications: regions (which we can’t reproduce in lab!) – Evidence for extra dimensions – Dark matter particles • Hopes of resolving: – Antimatter generated by dark matter self- – String theory interactions – LQG • Neutrino great example Ideas… • Big Bang Theory • Steady State Theory • Inflationary Universe • Ekpyrotic Universe • Multiple Universes • String Theory Landscape • Holographic Universe 2.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us