Axioms for Set Theory the Following Is a Subset of the Zermelo-Fraenkel

Axioms for Set Theory the Following Is a Subset of the Zermelo-Fraenkel

Axioms for Set Theory The following is a subset of the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms for set theory. In this setting, all objects are sets which are denoted by letters, e.g. x; y; X; Y . Equality is logical identity: sets X; Y are equal (X = Y ) if and only if the letters X; Y denote the same set. There is a primitive notion of membership between sets (x 2 X) which is read x is a member of X. 1. Equality Axiom: Sets X; Y are equal if they have the same members. (8X)(8Y )(X = Y $ (8x)(x 2 X $ x 2 Y )) The set X is said to be a subset of Y every element of X is an element of Y . This statement is denoted by X ⊆ Y . 2. Empty Set Axiom: There is a set with no elements. (9Z)(8x)x2 = Z This set Z is denoted by fg or ;. 3. Doubleton Axiom: For any sets x; y there is a set whose elements are x; y. (8x)(8y)(9Z)(z 2 Z $ (z = x ^ z = y)) This set Z is denoted by fx; yg. The singleton set fxg is defined to be fx; xg. 4. Set Union Axiom: For any set X there is a set whose elements are the elements of the sets in the set X. (8X)(9Z)((8z)(z 2 Z $ (9Y )(Y 2 X ^ z 2 Y ))) S S This set is denoted by X. If A; B are sets the union of A and B is defined to be fA; Bg. This set is denoted by A [ B. We have x 2 A [ B $ (x 2 A _ x 2 B). 5. Power Set Axiom: For any set X there is a set whose elements are the subsets of X. (8X)(9Z)(z 2 X $ z ⊆ X) This set Z is called the power set of X and is denoted by P (X). 6. Set Formation Axiom: For any set A and any statement P (x) involving a variable set x there is a subset of A consisting of those elements x in A for which P (x) is true. (9X)(8x)(x 2 X $ (x 2 A ^ P (x))) This set is denoted by fx j x 2 A ^ P (x)g or fx 2 A j P (x)g. This axiom is actually actually an axiom scheme; one axiom for each P (x). If C is a non-empty set, say C1 2 C then (8C)(C 2 C ! x 2 C) () x 2 C1 ^ (8C)(C 2 C =) x 2 C) T T so that the set C = fx j (8C)(C 2 C ! x 2 C) exists by Axiom 6. TheT set C consists of those elements which lie in every set in the collection C. If C = fA; Bg then C = fx j x 2 A ^ x 2 Bg which is by definition A \ B, the intersection of the sets A and B. 1 7. Infinity Axiom: (9Z)(; 2 Z ^ (z 2 Z ! z [ fzg 2 Z)) A set Z is called an inductive set if ; 2 Z and z 2 Z ! z [ fzg 2 Z. The infinity axiom simply states that there is an inductive set. T Theorem 1. If C is a non-empty collection of inductive sets then C is inductive. T Proof. Let D = C. We have ; 2 D since every set C 2 C is inductive and hence ; 2 C. Let x 2 D. Then for every set C 2 C we have x 2 C which implies x [ fxg 2 C since C is inductive. Thus x [ fxg 2 D and D is inductive. QED Theorem 2. Let Z be an inductive set and let N be the intersection of the inductive subsets of Z. If D is any inductive set then N ⊆ D. Proof. Since D \ Z is an inductive subset of Z we have N ⊆ D \ Z and so N ⊆ D. QED Definition 1. The set N of natural numbers is the smallest inductive set (with respect to the inclusion relation). The existence and uniqueness of N follows immediately from Theorem 2. If we define x + 1 to be x [ fxg and 0 = ;; 1 = 0 + 1 = f0g; 2 = 1 + 1 = f0; 1g; 3 = 2 + 1 = f0; 1; 2g; 4 = 3 + 1 = f0; 1; 2; 3g; ::: then 0; 1; 2; 3; 4; :::: 2 N. We now establish the elementary properties of the natural numbers. The first property which follows immediately from the fact that set N is the contained in every inductive set is the so-called Principle of Induction. If S is a subset of N which satisfies (a) 0 2 S (b) n 2 S =) n + 1 2 S then S = N. Proposition 1. (8n 2 N)(8m 2 N)(m 2 n =) m ⊆ n) Proof. Let S = fn 2 N j (8m 2 N)(m 2 n =) m ⊆ n)g. By the Principle of Induction is suffices to prove that S is inductive. We have 0 2 S since (8m 2 N)(m 2 0 =) m ⊆ 0) is vacuously true as 0 = ; implies that m 2 0 is false for all m 2 N. Now suppose that n 2 S and that m 2 n + 1. Then m 2 n or m = n. If m 2 n we have by our inductive hypothesis n 2 S that m ⊆ n which is also true if m = n. Since n ⊆ n + 1 we obtain m ⊆ n + 1 and hence that n + 1 2 S. Hence S is inductive. QED Corollary 1. (8m 2 N)(8n 2 N)(m + 1 = n + 1 =) m = n) Proof. If m + 1 = n + 1 then m 2 n + 1 which implies m 2 n or m = n and hence that m ⊆ n by Proposition 1. Similarly n 2 m + 1 implies n ⊆ m. Hence m = n. QED Definition 2. The mapping σ : N ! N defined by σ(n) = n + 1 is called the successor mapping. We also denote σ(n) by n+. Theorem 3. The successor mapping is injective with image N ¡ f0g. 2 Proof. The injectivity follows from Corollary 1. The mapping σ is not surjective since 0 6= n + 1 for any n 2 N. Now let S = f0g [ σ(N). It suffices to show that S = N. Since 0 2 we only have to show that n 2 S =) n + 1 2 S in order to prove that S is inductive. But n + 1 = σ(n) 2 S for any n 2 N so n + 1 2 S for any n 2 S. QED Corollary 2. If n 2 N and n 6= 0 there is a unique m 2 N with n = m + 1. This natural number m is denoted by n ¡ 1 or n¡ and is called the immediate predecessor of n. Proposition 2. (8n 2 N)n2 = n Proof. Let S = fn j n2 = ng. Then 0 2 S since 0 2= 0 = ;. Suppose that n 2 S. Then n2 = n. We want to show that n + 1 2= n + 1. Suppose to the contrary that n + 1 2 n + 1 = n [ fng. Then n + 1 2 n or n + 1 = n which implies n + 1 ⊆ n by Proposition 1. But then n 2 n + 1 implies that n 2 n which is a contradiction. Hence n + 1 2 S and S is inductive. QED Corollary 3. (8n 2 N)(8m 2 N)(m 2 n =) m ½ n) Proposition 3. (8n 2 N)(8m 2 N)(m 2 n () m ½ n) Proof. By Corollary 3 we only have to prove (8n 2 N)(8m 2 N)(m ½ n =) m 2 n. Let S = fn 2 N j (8m 2 N)(m ½ n =) m 2 n)g. Then 0 2 S since m ½ 0 = ; is false for all m. Let n 2 S and suppose that m ½ n + 1 = n [ fng. Then m ⊆ n or n 2 m. If m ⊆ n then m = n or m 2 n by the inductive hypothesis. In either case m 2 n + 1. If n 2 m then n ½ m ½ n + 1, which is not possible. Hence n + 1 2 S and S is inductive. QED Proposition 4. (8n 2 N)(8m 2 N)(m ⊆ n _ n ⊆ m) Proof. By induction on n. Let S = fn 2 N j (8m 2 N)(m ⊆ n or n ⊆ m)g. Then 0 2 S since 0 = ; ⊆ m for any m. Let n 2 S and let m 2 N. Then m ⊆ n or n ½ m. But m ⊆ n implies that m ⊆ n + 1 and n ½ m implies n 2 m and hence n + 1 = n [ fng ⊆ m. Hence n + 1 2 S and S is inductive. QED Corollary 4. N is linearly ordered under inclusion. If m; n 2 N we also denote m ⊆ n by m · n. Definition 3. For n 2 N we let [0; n) denote the set fm 2 N j 0 · m < ng. Note that by the definition of N we have [0; n) = n for any n 2 N. Definition 4. Let X be a set. An infinite sequence of elements of X is a function with domain N and range a subset of X. If a is an infinite sequence it is denoted by (an) = (a0; a1; : : : ; an;:::) where an = a(n) = (n + 1)¡st term of a. A finite sequence of elements of X of length n is a function a with domain [0; n) and range a subset of X. If n = 0 the domain of the finite sequence is ; and the sequence is called the empty sequence.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us