The Ant Subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, and Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Late Eocene Ambers of Europe G

The Ant Subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, and Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Late Eocene Ambers of Europe G

ISSN 0031-0301, Paleontological Journal, 2009, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1043–1086. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2009. The Ant Subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, and Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Late Eocene Ambers of Europe G. M. Dlussky Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Moscow, 119899 Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received May 20, 2008 Abstract—The ant subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae and Pseudomyrmecinae are revised in the Baltic, Bitterfeld, Rovno, and Scandinavian ambers of the Late Eocene age. Thirteen new species are described: Amblyopone groehni sp. n., A. electrina sp. n., Pachycondyla conservata sp. n., P. tristis sp. n., Ponera lobu- lifera sp. n., P. mayri sp. n., P. wheeleri sp. n., Gnamptogenys rohdendorfi sp. n., Bradoponera similis sp. n., Proceratium eocenicum sp. n. (Ponerinae), Procerapachys sulcatus sp. n. (Cerapachyinae), Tetraponera euro- paea sp. n., and T. groehni sp. n. (Pseudomyrmecinae). Tetraponera angustata (Mayr) is synonymized with T. simplex (Mayr). Keys to species are provided. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030109090068 Key words: Ants, Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Amblyopone, Bradoponera, Hypoponera, Electroponera, Gnamptogenys, Pachycondyla, Platythyrea, Ponera, Procerapachys, Proceratium, Tetrapon- era, new species, keys, Baltic amber, Bitterfeld amber, Rovno amber, Scandinavian amber, Late Eocene. INTRODUCTION ovsky et al., 2007; Dlussky and Rasnitsyn, 2009, this volume). Species from the subfamilies Ponerinae, Cerapachy- inae, and Pseudomyrmicinae comprise only a small The following collections were examined (the part of the ant diversity in the Late Eocene ambers: the abbreviations used in this publication are given in parentheses): proportion of their individuals in various ambers does not exceed 5%. However, because each of these species Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of is represented by only a few specimens, the share of Sciences, Moscow (PIN): Baltic amber; these subfamilies in the total number of species is sig- Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Acad- nificantly larger, 16.8% (29 out of 173). Yet, by this emy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev (SIZK): Rovno parameter, too, they are less diverse than the “large” amber; subfamilies, Dolichoderinae, Formicinae, and Myrmic- inae (39, 41, and 56 species, respectively). At the same Museum Ziemi PAN, Warsaw, Poland (MZ PAN): time, Ponerinae, Cerapachyinae, and Pseudomyrmici- Baltic amber; nae are of particular interest because representatives of Natural History Museum, London (NHML): Baltic these subfamilies display numerous plesiomorphic amber; characters and are highly important for reconstructing Naturhistorische Museum in Wien, Austria the phylogeny of ants. (NHMW): types of G. Mayr (1868) from the Baltic In the recent years I examined extensive collections amber; of ants preserved in Baltic (Kaliningrad Region of Rus- Geowissenschaftlicher Zentrum der Georg-August- sia and Poland), Bitterfeld (West Germany), Rovno Universität, Göttingen, Germany (GZG.BST): collec- (Ukraine), and Scandinavian (Denmark) ambers, tion of Baltic amber, which is part of the collection for- including all the survived types of the species previ- merly owned by the Geological Institute of Königsberg ously described by Mayr (1868) and Wheeler (1915). In and described by W. M. Wheeler (1915); contains some total, more than 5000 ant inclusions were studied, of Wheeler’s types. Below, in the lists of examined including 140 individuals from the subfamilies revised material for each species I indicated both the new num- here. The Late Eocene age, shared by all of the exam- bers (preceded by GZG.BST) and the old numbers ined ambers, and the assumed independence of their from the Königsberg collection (in parentheses); only origin are discussed in more detail elsewhere (Perk- the new numbers are given elsewhere in the text. 1043 1044 DLUSSKY r-rs 1RS RS + M R 1M 3r C 5RS 1r + 2r R rs-m M + Cu rm mcu 4M 3M A 2M cua m-cu cu-a A Cu + A 1Cu 2Cu cu-a RS A Cu M Fig. 1. Wings of a gyne Gnamptogenys europaea (Mayr), neotype SIZK, no. UA-822. Designations: (C, R, RS, M, Cu, A) longitu- dinal veins, (1RS, RS + M, 2M, etc.) their sections, (r-rs, r-m, m-cu, etc.) crossveins, (1r + 2r, rm, mcu, cua) cells. Humboldt Museum, Berlin, Germany (HM): Bitter- are measured strictly in profile, the head from above (in feld amber; full face view), and the scape so oriented that its mea- Zoological Museum of the University of Copen- sured length is maximal. Because it is often impossible hagen (ZMUC): Scandinavian and Baltic amber; to see certain parts of the inclusion from the proper angle, I could not take measurements from every spec- Personal collection of Carsten Gröhn, Glinde, Ger- imen and, therefore, only those taken more or less pre- many (CGC): Baltic and Bitterfeld ambers; type speci- cisely are included. The abbreviations for measure- mens from this collection are deposited at the Geologi- ments are as follows: AL, length of mesosoma from cal-Paleontological Institute and Museum at the Uni- articulation with head to articulation with petiole; BL, versity of Hamburg (Geologische-Paläontologischer combined body length; ED, maximum eye diameter; Institut der Universität Hamburg) (GPIH); F3, length of metafemur; FWL, length of forewing; Personal collection of Manfred Kutscher, Sassnitz, HL, length of head without mandibles; HW, maximum Rügen, Germany (MKC), recently acquired by the width of head without eyes; MdL, length of mandible; Geowissenschaftlicher Zentrum der Universität Göttin- PptL, length of postpetiole; PptH, height of postpeti- gen (GZG.BST): Bitterfeld amber; ole; PptW, maximum width of postpetiole; PtL, length Personal collection of V. A. Gusakov, Korolev, Mos- of petiole; PtH, maximum height of petiole; PtW, max- cow Region (VGC): Baltic amber. imum width of petiole; SL, length of scape. All the drawings illustrate actual specimens and The body length is reported at the beginning of each were prepared by tracing over photographs, taken using species description for the following reasons. First, it an Olympus SZX9 stereomicroscope equipped with an cannot be measured precisely, because gastral segments Olympus Camedia C-3030 digital camera or on a Zeiss in ants can be drawn into one another. At the same time, Stemi SV11 stereomicroscope equipped with an Axio- in the process of identification, even an approximate Cam HRC camera, using CorelDraw 9 software. The size allows to immediately exclude a significantly thick continuous lines show margins of tergites; the thin larger or smaller ant species. continuous lines, elements of sculpture and hairs; and The generic diagnoses and species descriptions the dashed lines, folds and assumed margins of tergites below include only those characters that can be seen on by dashed lines. Extraneous objects obstructing the specimens enclosed in amber. The problem is that some inclusion are represented by filled areas. Only the hairs important diagnostic characters cannot be seen on visible on the inclusion are illustrated. It should be kept inclusions. This is particularly true about mouthparts in mind that hairs are not always preserved and some and terminalia. When an ant becomes trapped into are visible only if illuminated at a particular angle. resin, it often releases liquid from its mouth and anus. In the systematics of recent ants, measurements are This liquid mixes with the resin to form an opaque taken in standard positions: the mesosoma and petiole “cloud”. Pubescense also tends to be preserved incom- PALEONTOLOGICAL JOURNAL Vol. 43 No. 9 2009 THE ANT SUBFAMILIES PONERINAE, CERAPACHYINAE 1045 pletely. Descriptions of the previously known species imately ten species have been described from Baltic were composed anew, except when I have not seen amber. Below I describe additional ten species from specimens of a given species. In that case, the original Baltic and similar ambers. description, somewhat modified and brought into Unlike other ants, mostly represented by workers, accord with modern terminology, is included. Ponerinae are represented predominantly by alate sex- Data on the number of genera and species are taken uals. For example, among the 19 amber specimens of from the latest version of the electronic catalogue by Gnamptogenys europea known to date, two are alate Bolton et al. (2006). The complete generic synonymy gynes, 15 are males, and only one is a worker. Among can be found in that catalogue and is not reproduced the 33 Pachycondyla succinea, 28 are alate gynes and here. The nomenclature of the forewing venation used five are males. Among the 59 inclusions of Hypoponera in this paper is illustrated in Fig. 1. Other terms follow and Ponera (not differentiated from one another by Bolton (1994). Mayr and Wheeler), 14 are alate gynes, 42 are males, and only three are workers (Mayr, 1868; Wheeler, 1915, and original data). Pachycondyla gracillicornis, Subfamily Ponerinae Lepeletier, 1835 P. baltica, and the species Amblyopone electrina, Recently, Bolton (2003) proposed a new higher Gnamptogenys rohdendorfi, Proceratium eocenicum, classification of ants, with 21 subfamilies. He divided Pachyconyla conservata, and P. tristis, which are the former subfamily Ponerinae into six subfamilies described below, are also represented exclusively by (Amblyoponinae, Ponerinae, Ectatomminae, Het- sexuals. eroponerinae, Paraponerinae, and Proceratiinae) and This is explained primarily by the fact that the vast the former subfamily Myrmicinae into the small sub- majority of

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    44 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us