The Genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe �� MARTIN KRAJICEK,JAN FOTT,MARIA R

The Genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe �� MARTIN KRAJICEK,JAN FOTT,MARIA R

Zoologica Scripta The genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe MARTIN KRAJICEK,JAN FOTT,MARIA R. MIRACLE,MARC VENTURA,RUBEN SOMMARUGA, PHILIPP KIRSCHNER &MARTIN CERNY Submitted: 17 November 2015 Krajıcek, M., Fott, J., Miracle, M.R., Ventura, M., Sommaruga, R., Kirschner, P., Cerny, Accepted: 8 March 2016 M. (2015). The genus Cyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in Europe. — Zoologica Scripta, 00, doi:10.1111/zsc.12183 000–000. Although copepods of the genus Cyclops are among the most common and dominant plank- ton taxa of lakes in the northern temperate zone, their taxonomy is still unclear. We analy- sed an extensive array of Cyclops populations from Europe by means of molecular methods and evaluated morphological characters. Altogether, 68 populations of Cyclops species were sampled, assigned to morphospecies and sequenced for the 12S rRNA gene. Selected popu- lations of each morphospecies were additionally sequenced for three mitochondrial (16S rRNA, cytochrome b, COI) and two nuclear genes (18S rRNA, ITS1) and analysed for micromorphological traits. Our analysis revealed fifteen lineages that can be regarded as separate species. Thirteen of these match currently accepted species, while the remaining two lineages were distinct from the other described species. Thus, their taxonomic status is open to further studies. Besides taxonomy, our study gives new insights into the ecology, distribution and phylogenetic relationships of these species. Finally, a set of morphological traits was selected to facilitate identification. Corresponding author: Martin Krajıcek, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, Prague 2 CZ-12844, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Martin Krajıcek, and Jan Fott, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, Prague 2 CZ-12844, Czech Republic. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Maria R. Miracle, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Microbiology and Ecology, University of Valencia, Campus of Burjassot E-46100, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] Marc Ventura, Spanish National Research Council, Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB- CSIC), C/d’acces a la Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, Girona E-17300, Spain. E-mail: ventura@- ceab.csic.es Ruben Sommaruga, and Philipp Kirschner, University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology, Techniker- str. 25, Innsbruck A–6020, Austria. E-mails: [email protected], philipp.kirschner@ student.uibk.ac.at Martin Cerny, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, Prague 2 CZ-12844, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction species and subspecies (Lindberg 1957). Most recently, the Of the currently recognized species of the genus Cyclops last major revision of the genus (Einsle 1996b) resulted in O.F. Muller,€ 1776 (Crustacea, Copepoda), seven were 22 species worldwide. described in the second half of the 19th century: Cyclops Like in most invertebrates, species descriptions of cyclo- strenuus Fischer, 1851, Cyclops furcifer Claus, 1857, Cyclops poid copepods are based mainly on morphological traits. insignis Claus, 1857, Cyclops abyssorum G.O. Sars, 1863, The range of these traits has extended since the era of Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863, Cyclops scutifer G.O. Sars, early investigators from large distinct structures (antennule 1863 and Cyclops vicinus Uljanin, 1875. Since then, the segmentation, thoracic legs and their armature, furca) to number of recognized species has fluctuated considerably – microstructures (spinulation and setation, minute pits, pore from a ‘lumping’ together by considering C. furcifer, C. configuration), which have often been shown to be species- scutifer, C. abyssorum and C. vicinus to be synonyms of specific. A good example of such microstructures is the C. strenuus (Schmeil 1892), to an ‘oversplitting’ of up to 52 configuration of spinules on the coxopodite of the fourth ª 2016 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1 The genus Cyclops in Europe M. Krajıcek et al. leg. These structures were earlier just depicted (Schmeil 2013. The samples came from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, 1892; Guerney 1933) without being mentioned in the text. the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Einsle (1985) pointed out their taxonomical importance Greece, Iceland, Montenegro, Norway (incl. Svalbard), and later on (Einsle 1996a,b) he included them in the diag- Poland, Romania, Russia (Lake Baikal), Slovakia, Spain, noses of Cyclops species. Other microcharacters used in the Sweden and Switzerland (Table S1) and included various taxonomy of Cyclops were described for the antennules, habitats such as glacial lakes, rift lakes, a karst lake, reser- antennae, maxillules and maxillipeds (Einsle 1996b; Dussart voirs, fishponds, mining lakes, riverine, and ephemeral and & Defaye 2001; Hołynska & Dahms 2004; Hołynska rock pools. Zooplankton were collected by plankton net 2008). Microcharacters were also extensively used in revi- tows from the shore or from an inflatable boat. Shallow sions of the genera Paracyclops and Ochridacyclops (Karaytug pools were sampled by a plankton net attached to a pole, 1999), Mesocyclops (Hołynska et al. 2003) and Thermocyclops or water was scooped up with a plastic jug and filtered (Mirabdullayev et al. 2003). through the plankton net. All samples for subsequent While the morphological delimitation of Cyclops species molecular analysis were preserved in 96% ethanol and advanced, analyses of other non-morphological traits began stored in a refrigerator. to be used as well. Einsle (1962) was the first to extend Identification was performed according to Einsle species diagnoses in Cyclops using observable cellular struc- (1996b). Specimens were assigned to established morphos- tures that are independent of external morphology, namely pecies by comparison with detailed descriptions and figures, chromatin diminution at the beginning of egg cleavage. but not by the usage of the dichotomic key. The identifica- This technique, however, has not become widely used in tion was subsequently checked using microcharacters on cyclopoid taxonomy because of the need to have live cephalothoracic appendages described by Hołynska & ovigerous females in high quantity and because of the Dahms (2004). For species not included in their study absence of chromatin diminution in many genera or even (Cyclops bohater Kozminski, 1933, Cyclops ochridanus Kiefer, inside some genera of Cyclopinae (Dussart & Defaye 1932, Cyclops kikuchii, C. vicinus), these traits were newly 2001). Moreover, the patterns of excised DNA during the established. diminution process are in fact also evaluated as morpholog- ical traits, although at the cellular level. Another method Morphological analysis independent of external morphology was based on allozyme For the detailed study of morphological traits, the tech- analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis. With this niques of observation and dissection recommended by Dus- method, it was possible to discriminate among the morpho- sart & Defaye (2001) were followed, but in addition logically similar species Cyclops vicinus–C. kikuchii Smirnov, copepods were treated in hot potassium hydroxide. About 1932 (Einsle 1994) and C. heberti Einsle, 1996–C. divergens 5 ethanol-preserved specimens were transferred into a Lindberg, 1936 (syn.: C. singularis Einsle, 1996)–C. furcifer small glass beaker, and 1 mL of 10% KOH was added. (Einsle 1996a). The beaker was covered with a large coverslip and heated Since the 1990s, the molecular genetic analysis of selected at 80 °C for 20 min (formalin-preserved specimens need to segments of DNA has become a standard method for species be heated at 90 °C for 30 min; the optimal variant for dif- delimitation. This approach has been well established in the ferent samples must be tested) to dissolve the soft tissues of taxonomy of Cladocera (Petrusek et al. 2008) and Calanoida the specimens until only translucent chitinous envelopes (Bucklin et al. 1995; Lindeque et al. 1999; Adamowicz et al. remained. Washing off the hydroxide was performed using 2007; Scheihing et al. 2010). However, molecular genetic a chamber made of a small plastic test tube, the bottom of studies on Cyclopoida are scarce (Blaha et al. 2010; Wyn- which was replaced by a nylon netting of 40 lm mesh size. gaard et al. 2010; Hamrova et al. 2012), and a broad genetic The washed copepods were then stained overnight in water study on the genus Cyclops has not yet been carried out. with a few drops of chlorazol black in ethanol. The stained Therefore, our main objective was to assess whether lineages copepods were transferred into a 1:1 mixture of 70% etha- emerging from a phylogenetic analysis correspond to cur- nol and glycerol and heated at 80 °C until the water and rently accepted morphospecies. Another goal was to identify ethanol evaporated, which made them ready for dissection. groups of related species within the genus and search for The dissection was performed in a drop of glycerol under their phylogenetic relations. a stereomicroscope. Dissection needles consisted of short, well-sharpened tungsten wires of 0.3 mm diameter, Material and methods attached to inoculating loop holders. Study sites, sampling and species assignment The following copepod parts were isolated and mounted Our study focuses on European species of the genus Cyclops individually in a series of permanent mounts: antennules that were sampled

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us