ISSUE 1 The Researc her The Refugee Documentation Centre Newsletter 30th March 2006 COI Researchers: Welcome to the first issue of The Who we are & what we do. Researcher. The Refugee Documentation Centre (or the The Researcher is a new initiative of the RDC or simply the Doc Centre as our friends Refugee Documentation Centre. It is an know us) is a clearing house and research electronic newsletter distributed by e-mail and service for Country of Origin Information for published quarterly. The purpose of The government agencies, solicitors and Researcher is to provide our clients and contractors of the RLS. We also provide interested parties with up to date information on library services to our clients. developments in the RDC. The newsletter will cover topics related to Country of Origin While we are a body functioning within the Information and legal research. We hope to Legal Aid Board, we are an independent feature a specialist article on a particular theme service, providing objective information to all in each issue. We will also let you know of our clients. recent library acquisitions, new resources and relevant RDC statistics. We welcome your The function of the COI researcher is to feedback on any of these matters. provide Any letters, comments, news or views can be Current sent to us at the following addresses: Relevant Reliable [email protected] Balanced [email protected] Accurate and Verifiable, as well as [email protected] Transparent Country of Origin Information. This issue contains the following articles: * * * * * COI Researchers: Who we are & what About the Library Management System we do. (LMS) The RDC’s Library Management System The LMS has been released to agencies and (LMS) is available at http://lib.lab.ie. This is a COI Network and E-Training separate database to the COI database which High Court Case Summary is already available at www.coi.lab.ie. To use Who are the Ogboni? the LMS you will login using your own RDC Statistics username and password which will be assigned to you by the RDC. PAGE 2 THE RESEARCHER About the Library Management System search of RDC holdings you must search (LMS) (cont’d) both. The RDC will be providing training to the agencies on the use of the LMS and COI The RDC will have a record of all usernames Database once the LMS has been released. If and passwords supplied so if a password is you have any queries on either database mislaid, it can be re-supplied. Your homepage please contact the RDC. on the LMS will have your own contact details and a record of any items requested or borrowed from the RDC library. This * * * * * information will be on the left hand side of the COI Network and E-Training screen. If any details are incorrect please contact the RDC. A list of options common to The RDC participated in developing the COI all users will be available on the right hand training programme which is used in a number side of the screen, for example Advanced of European countries. The RDC currently Search, What’s New, Serials and Journals etc. conducts this training programme as face-to- face training over the course of two days and The LMS will contain the following: has recently participated with European Library Catalogue Records: Catalogue counterparts in the development of an e- entries for books and reports held in the RDC learning course. library. You will be able to request a library item on the system. The training programme enables persons Journal Contents Pages: Listing of articles working with COI to understand the basic available in each issue of any journal received principles of RSD; apply quality standards in in the RDC. These were previously distributed COI research; identify and select relevant and either by email or placed on internal bulletin reliable sources and information; conduct boards. efficient research and document search Published Anonymised Query Responses: results according to quality control standards. These are the full text of our query responses with identifying information of the The e-learning course can be delivered as a requester/client/researcher removed and stand alone version for independent self study edited in accordance with the RDC Style (CD-ROM and Web based) as well as in a Guide. The RDC is focussing initially on tutor-supported blended learning format. It is publishing the most recent query responses. proposed to introduce a test phase in March However we will be publishing past query and during that phase the quality will be responses in due course. assessed by an external observer. The search page on the LMS will allow you to The blended learning format will be offered limit your search, if desired, for example, to over the course of three weeks online followed queries only. You can search by country, by a one day face-to-face training at the end subject/keywords, free text etc or by a of the course. The weekly study time will combination of options. The LMS can also consist of 20 learning hours (3 weeks x 4 generate a ‘What’s New?’ page. This will learning hours online phase + 8 hours face-to- present you with a list of the most recent face training. The RDC will provide e-tutor additions to the catalogue. Note that the LMS support for the duration of the online phase will be updated on a continual basis. and also for a determined period following the Remember that the LMS and COI Database face-to-face training. The course is currently are not the same and to carry out a complete available in English and it is proposed to PAGE 3 THE RESEARCHER translate it into Italian, German, French and Facts Russian at a later date. It is targeted at three Three judicial review proceedings were different COI user groups – COI heard together by agreement of the parties. research/specialists; decision makers/judges The applicants sought a review of their and consultants/legal representatives. entitlement to certain previous determinations made by the Refugee Participants need to possess basic computer and Appeals Tribunal. The applicants contended internet skills. They should know how to open, save, that the effect of the refusal of the Refugee read, download files, work with text-editing software Appeals Tribunal to grant access to previous (e.g. Word) and be able to use email and browser. decisions or determinations of that body Access to a computer with internet connection is also would “have a bearing upon, or are relevant required. or material decisions relating to their applications before that body.” The applicants claim an entitlement to records of For further information please contact previous decisions of the Tribunal as a [email protected] matter of fair procedures. The applicants had contended that they were entitled to “the same degree of natural justice and fairness * * * * * of procedures as a citizen” and this applies High Court Case Summary where he or she has made an application for asylum or refugee status. The Tribunal Atanasov and others v Refugee Appeals submitted that there is no mandatory Tribunal (Tribunal Member, Aidan Eames), requirement to do so by virtue of the Chairman of The Refugee Appeals Tribunal Refugee Act, 1996, as amended, and and Minister for Justice Equality and Law referred to section 19 of that Act, which deals Reform with confidentiality, publication of decisions and the Chairman’s discretion. The Tribunal High Court Judicial Review Mr. Justice John further submitted that sections 16(17), 28 MacMenamin 07/07/2005 [2004 No. 572 JR] and 28(A) of that Act, which deal with Asylum – Refugee Appeals Tribunal – Refusal communication of decisions and the question of Refugee Appeals Tribunal to grant access of retrospectivity, preclude the Chairman to applicants to certain previous decisions by from publishing his decisions. The Tribunal that body – Refugee Act, 1996, sections 19, submitted that publication of previous 16 and 28 – Function of the Chairman - Right decisions was not a requirement of fair of applicants to access certain previous procedures. determinations – The nature of the procedure - Entitlement to natural justice and fair procedures – Extent of fair procedures “there must be vested in the Chairman a positive Consequences of confidential hearings in discretion to publish decisions which are of legal private – Companies Act, 1963, section 205 – importance”. Bunreacht na hÉireann, 1937, Articles 34, 34.1º - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,1953,Article 6.1 – Decisions of the Held by Justice MacMenamin that there is a European Court of Human Rights – Common discretion in s. 19 4A (a) not to publish Law Authority – Legal Principles and their unimportant decisions of the Tribunal. But Application – Discretion of the Chairman to this does not preclude publication of all publish decisions. decisions. PAGE 4 THE RESEARCHER It is clear from s. 4A(a) and (b) that there A good summary of the available information must be vested in the Chairman a positive on the Ogboni can be found in a “Response discretion to publish decisions which are of to Information Request” published by legal importance. Decisions of the Tribunal ACCORD in June 2004. This states that “The can only be considered relevant to an Ogboni is a Yoruba secret society, an Elders’ applicant where they deal with a substantive Council, whose structures date back to pre- issue of legal principle. The court held that colonial times where the Ogboni were part of such principles are at stake in the applicants the system of checks and balances of cases. The respondents’ refusal to make Yoruba kingdoms. Apart from being available to the applicants in the second and kingmakers, they had religious as well as third set of proceedings relevant tribunal judicial power.” decisions constitutes an unlawful exercise of the statutory discretion afforded them under An important distinction needs to be made the Immigration Act of 2003.