Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars and Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters in Supernova Remnants

Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars and Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters in Supernova Remnants

Anomalous X-ray Pulsars and Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters in Supernova Remnants Bryan Gaensler Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Introduction There is little direct information for AXPs/SGRs on: • Distances Robert • Ages • Space velocities Mallozzi • Lifetimes / UAH MSFC • Birthsites • Progenitors • Evolution Indirect information from associations with: Supernova remnants Star clusters Molecular clouds Associations with SNRs For radio pulsars, typical criteria for association are: • Evidence for interaction . • Consistent distances/ages (tPSR = P/2P) • Inferred transverse velocity: V^ = RPSR / t • Proper motion • Probability of random alignment Galactic plane, 4o < l < 200 (11 cm Bonn survey): Gaensler & Frail (2000) 20 SNRs, 66 radio pulsars, 14 “associations” AXPs in SNRs Age (kyr) Pchance V^ (km/s) • 1E 2259+586 in CTB 109 ~10 5 x 10-4 < 400 (Fahlman & Gregory 1981) • 1E 1841-045 in Kes 73 2 1 x 10-4 < 500 (Vasisht & Gotthelf 1997) • AX J1845-0258 in G29.6+0.1 < 8 2 x 10-3 < 500 (Gaensler et al 1999) x CTB 109 (ROSAT; Rho & Petre 1997) Kes 73 (Chandra; Slane et al 2002) G29.6+0.1 (VLA; Gaensler et al 1999) Other AXPs • RX J170849-400910 - complicated region - adjacent SNR? (P = 10%) Are these AXPs • 1E 1048.1-5937 older than or - near ? Carina different from the + • 4U 0142+61 others? - no nearby sources • CXOU J010042.8-721132 - near H II / SNR complex N66 CXOU J010042 (AAT Ha; Ye et al 1991) + + + RX J170849 (VLA; Gaensler et al 2001) 1E 1048 (MOST; Whiteoak 1994) 4U 0142 (DRAO; Gaensler et al 2001) Properties of AXPs • 2 out of 6 AXPs (3 out of 7?) definitely associated with SNRs - at SNR centres; implied velocities V^ < 500 km/s; age < 10 kyr - similar to youngest pulsars and “radio-quiet” neutron stars • AXPs are young neutron stars, lifetimes ~ 10 kyr (birth-rate > 1/2000 yr) ? EM dipole braking: magnetars, but limited lifetimes (Colpi et al 2000; Duncan 2001) ? accretion: exotic models required to attain long P (Chatterjee et al 2000; Alpar 2001) -3 • SNR age, size: high inferred ambient densities, n0 > 1 cm (Marsden et al 2001) - huge uncertainties in age, explosion energy, distance ? ? n0/n0 ~ 100 - selection effect: AXPs all found in targeted observations of SNRs! Kes 73 (Chandra; Slane et al 2002) G11.2-0.3 (Chandra; Kaspi et al 2001) Cas A (Chandra; Tananbaum 1999) SGR 0526-66 • On rim of SNR N49 in the LMC (Cline et al 1982; Rothschild et al 1994) - t ~ 5000 yr, V^ ~ 1000 km/s - P = 2 x 10-3 over whole LMC - but in complicated region… x N49 (HST; Williams et al 2002) Large Magellanic Cloud (IRAS 60 µm) SGR 1806-20 • At centre of catalogued SNR G10.0-0.3 (Kulkarni & Frail 1993) - but SGR offset by 14? from core (Hurley et al 1999; Kaplan et al 2002) - central LBV, time-variable: is G10.0-0.3 a SNR? - coincident with massive star cluster & molecular clouds at 15 kpc (Corbel et al 1997; Fuchs et al 1999; Eikenberry et al 2001) + + G10.0-0.3 (VLA; Kulkarni & Frail 1993) 2.2 µm CTIO 4-m (Eikenberry et al 2001) SGR 1900+14 • 5 arcmin outside rim of SNR G42.8+0.6 (Hurley et al 1999) - complicated area, P = 0.04 (Gaensler et al 2001; Kaplan et al 2002) - adjacent young radio pulsar J1907+0918 (Lorimer & Xilouris 2000) - next to massive star cluster at d > 10 kpc (Vrba et al 2000) ++ + G42.8+0.6 (VLA; Kaplan et al 2002) I-band USNO (Vrba et al 2000) SGR 1627-41 • Next to SNR G337.0-0.1 (Woods et al 1999; Hurley et al 2000) - t < 5000 yr, V^ > 1000 km/s - P = 0.05, very complicated region (Sarma et al 1997; Smith et al 1999) - OH maser, molecular clouds: single complex at 11 kpc (Frail et al 1996; Corbel et al 1999) + G337.0-0.1 (ATCA; Sarma et al 1997) CTB 33 region (ATCA; Sarma et al 1997) SGR 1801-23 • Not well-localised (Cline et al 2000) - error circle passes near/through several SNRs - in dense region of Galactic Plane 11 cm Galactic Plane survey (Bonn; Reich et al 1990) Properties of SGRs • 3 out of 4 SGRs in vicinity of SNRs - outside SNRs; V^ > 1000 km/s; associations not compelling - almost all such PSR/SNR associations are spurious • Clearly associated with recent star formation and SNe activity - SGRs are neutron stars, ages < 100 kyr • If SGR/SNR associations are real… ? high velocity population, distinct from AXPs or radio pulsars asymmetric neutrino recoil? (Duncan & Thompson 1992) • If SGR/SNR associations are spurious... ? SGR ages ~ 50 kyr, SNRs have dissipated older population than AXPs? ? SGRs have massive progenitors, in low n0 bubbles? could explain associations with clusters & molecular clouds Conclusions • AXPs are associated with SNRs ? young (< 10 kyr) neutron stars, low space velocities x • SGRs are probably not associated with SNRs ? older (> 50 kyr) neutron stars whose SNRs have faded ? massive progenitors in low-density bubbles • The future… - proper motion of SGRs with Chandra (Hurley et al 2002) - looking for bubbles around SGRs (Gaensler et al 2002) - surveys of SNRs for compact sources (Kaplan et al 2002) .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us