2012 y Apppendices to: Ma Biological and Water Quality Study of the Upper Scioto River Watershed 2009 & 2011 John Kasich, Governor Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor Scott J. Nally, Director Upper Scioto River TSD Appendices 2009 & 2011 DSW/2012-3-5 May 01, 2012 Appendix A-1. Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI) attributes and scores collected from the upper Scioto River basin, 2009 and 2011 Appendix A-2. Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI) attributes and scores collected from the upper Scioto River basin, 2009 and 1995 Appendix B-1. Fish scores for the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) and the Modified Index of well-being (MIwb), 2009 & 2011 Appendix C-1. Fish Species and Abundance for Each Sampling Location, 2009 & 2011 Appendix D-1. Macroinvertebrate ICI Scores and Metrics, 2009 & 2011 Appendix E-1. Notice to Users, Biosurvey Background information, Mechanisms for Water Quality Impairment, and Methods Appendix F-1. Surface Water Chemistry Results, 2009 Appendix G-1. Durez Corporation - Chronology of Events and Remediation Plan Appendix A-1 Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI) attributes and scores collected from the upper Scioto River basin, 2009 and 2011. WWH Attributes MWH Attributes High Influence Moderate Influence Key QHEI Components River Gradient Mile QHEI (ft/mile) (02-001) Scioto River Year: 2011 211.5 59.0 3.25 # # # 3♦ 1• • • • • • • 7 0.50 2.25 210.1 67.0 1.21 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • • • 7 0.14 1.14 203.4 74.5 2.07 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • • 4 0.11 0.56 196.2 53.0 2.07 # # # # 4♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.40 1.60 192.2 61.0 0.92 # # # # 4♦ 1• • • • • 5 0.40 1.40 Year: 2009 236.7 61.5 5.15 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • 5 0.14 0.86 234.4 77.5 6.99 # # # # # # # 7 0• • • • 4 0.13 0.63 231.8 79.5 4.59 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • 2 0.11 0.33 226.3 38.5 1.50 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 224.2 32.5 1.50 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 1.00 3.33 222.8 37.5 1.02 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 216.6 46.0 1.20 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 0.75 2.50 211.5 46.5 3.25 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 1.00 3.33 210.1 57.0 1.21 # # # # 4 0• • • • • 5 0.20 1.20 203.4 74.5 2.07 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • 3 0.11 0.44 196.2 60.5 2.07 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 192.2 71.0 0.92 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • 4 0.14 0.71 186.0 67.0 0.74 # # # # 4♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.40 1.60 179.1 71.5 0.74 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • 5 0.17 1.00 (02-145) Fulton Creek Year: 2011 6.4 50.5 2.94 # # # 3♦ 1• • • • • • • 7 0.50 2.25 Year: 2009 16.3 27.0 3.60 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • 5 2.50 5.00 10.4 76.5 3.88 # # # # # # # 7 0• • • 3 0.13 0.50 8.7 42.5 4.81 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 1.00 3.33 6.4 60.5 2.94 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • • 6 0.14 1.00 1.2 74.0 13.16 # # # # # # # # # 9 0• • 2 0.10 0.30 (02-148) Kebler Run Year: 2009 0.8 83.5 7.46 # # # # # # # # 8♦ 1• 1 0.22 0.33 12/23/2011 1 WWH Attributes MWH Attributes High Influence Moderate Influence Key QHEI Components River Gradient Mile QHEI (ft/mile) (02-149) Ottawa Creek Year: 2009 0.1 79.5 33.33 # # # # # # # # # 9 0 0 0.10 0.10 (02-154) Battle Run Year: 2009 0.3 70.5 14.29 # # # # # # 6♦ ♦ 2• • • • 4 0.43 1.00 (02-155) Patton Run Year: 2009 2.3 56.0 5.38 # # # # # # 6♦ ♦ 2• • • • 4 0.43 1.00 (02-158) Little Scioto River Year: 2009 25.6 40.5 3.25 # # # # 4♦ 1• • • • • 5 0.40 1.40 19.7 69.5 4.55 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • 5 0.17 1.00 11.1 49.0 2.87 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 9.2 73.5 2.87 # # # # # # # # # 9 0• • • • 4 0.10 0.50 6.5 31.0 1.54 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 2.00 5.00 6.2 34.5 1.54 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 0.4 45.5 0.34 # # 2♦ 1• • • • • • • 7 0.67 3.00 (02-159) Honey Creek Year: 2009 0.1 58.5 33.33 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • 4 0.33 1.00 (02-162) Rock Fork Year: 2009 8.1 35.5 5.68 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • 5 1.67 3.33 1.1 74.0 4.88 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • 4 0.14 0.71 (02-165) Rush Creek Year: 2009 39.5 82.5 8.33 # # # # # # # # # 9 0• 1 0.10 0.20 36.2 82.0 37.04 # # # # # # # # # 9 0• • 2 0.10 0.30 26.3 65.5 6.10 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • 4 0.14 0.71 14.5 79.0 3.01 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • 2 0.11 0.33 8.8 61.0 3.36 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • • 6 0.17 1.17 7.4 60.5 3.45 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 5.4 62.5 2.79 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • • 6 0.17 1.17 0.6 60.0 3.91 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 12/23/2011 2 WWH Attributes MWH Attributes High Influence Moderate Influence Key QHEI Components River Gradient Mile QHEI (ft/mile) (02-166) McDonald Creek Year: 2009 9.1 38.0 5.32 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 6.8 43.0 11.11 # # # 3♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.00 2.50 2.7 44.5 5.32 # # # # # 5♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • 6 0.50 1.50 (02-172) Wildcat Creek Year: 2009 6.7 43.5 8.77 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 0.75 2.50 4.0 49.5 12.50 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • 6 0.75 2.25 0.5 84.5 6.02 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • 2 0.11 0.33 (02-175) Panther Creek Year: 2009 8.9 82.5 11.90 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • 3 0.11 0.44 7.8 75.0 9.43 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • • 4 0.11 0.56 1.8 71.5 6.10 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • 3 0.11 0.44 (02-177) Wolf Creek Year: 2009 0.5 59.0 12.20 # # # # # # # 7♦ ♦ 2• • • • • 5 0.38 1.00 (02-181) Taylor Creek Year: 2011 0.8 65.0 16.67 # # # # # # 6♦ 1• • • • • 5 0.29 1.00 Year: 2009 4.5 80.0 7.14 # # # # # # # # # 9 0• • 2 0.10 0.30 0.8 66.5 16.67 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • 5 0.14 0.86 (02-182) Silver Creek Year: 2009 2.3 74.5 10.53 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • 5 0.14 0.86 (02-186) McCoy Run Year: 2009 0.6 53.5 6.76 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 (02-188) Cottonwood Ditch Year: 2009 4.1 24.0 2.63 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • • • 7 1.67 4.00 0.7 18.0 2.05 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • • 6 2.50 5.50 12/23/2011 3 WWH Attributes MWH Attributes High Influence Moderate Influence Key QHEI Components River Gradient Mile QHEI (ft/mile) (02-190) Dunlap Creek Year: 2009 0.1 20.5 1.92 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • 5 2.50 5.00 (02-193) Wallace Fork Year: 2011 0.2 39.0 3.16 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • 5 2.50 5.00 (02-237) North Rockswale Ditch Year: 2009 0.6 49.0 3.29 # # # 3♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • 5 1.25 2.50 (02-374) Elliot Run Year: 2011 1.3 42.0 7.94 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 Year: 2009 1.3 38.0 7.94 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • • 6 1.67 3.67 12/23/2011 4 Appendix A-2 Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI) attributes and scores collected from the upper Scioto River basin, 2009 and 1995. WWH Attributes MWH Attributes High Influence Moderate Influence Key QHEI Components River Gradient Mile QHEI (ft/mile) (02-001) Scioto River Year: 2009 236.7 61.5 5.15 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • • 5 0.14 0.86 234.4 77.5 6.99 # # # # # # # 7 0• • • • 4 0.13 0.63 231.8 79.5 4.59 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • 2 0.11 0.33 226.3 38.5 1.50 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 224.2 32.5 1.50 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 1.00 3.33 222.8 37.5 1.02 # # 2♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 1.33 3.33 216.6 46.0 1.20 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 0.75 2.50 211.5 46.5 3.25 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 7 1.00 3.33 210.1 57.0 1.21 # # # # 4 0• • • • • 5 0.20 1.20 203.4 74.5 2.07 # # # # # # # # 8 0• • • 3 0.11 0.44 196.2 60.5 2.07 # # # # # 5♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.33 1.33 192.2 71.0 0.92 # # # # # # 6 0• • • • 4 0.14 0.71 186.0 67.0 0.74 # # # # 4♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.40 1.60 179.1 71.5 0.74 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • 5 0.17 1.00 Year: 1995 233.6 50.0 6.99 # # 2 0• • • • • • • • 8 0.33 3.00 231.7 65.5 4.59 # # # # # 5 0• • • • 4 0.17 0.83 226.3 23.0 1.50 0♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • • • 7 5.00 *.** 221.9 44.0 1.02 # # 2♦ 1• • • • • • 6 0.67 2.67 220.8 25.0 1.02 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 2.00 5.00 216.2 42.0 1.20 # # 4♦ ♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • • 6 0.60 1.80 213.9 32.0 3.65 0♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4• • • • • • 6 5.00 *.** 212.8 37.0 3.25 # 1♦ ♦ ♦ 3• • • • • • 6 2.00 5.00 211.5 52.0 3.25 # # # 3♦ 1• • • • • • • 7 0.50 2.25 211.3 45.5 1.21 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • 6 0.75 2.25 211.2 41.0 1.21 # # 2♦ ♦ 2• • • • • • 6 1.00 3.00 210.1 51.0 1.21 # # # 3♦ ♦ 2• • • • • 5 0.75 2.00 207.3 57.5 1.21 # # # 3 0• • • • • • 6 0.25 1.75 203.3 78.0 2.07 # # # # # # # 7 0• • • 3 0.13 0.50 192.2 60.5 0.92 # # # # # 5 0• • • • • 5 0.17 1.00 04/17/2012 1 Appendix B-1 Fish scores for the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) and the Modified Index of well being (MIwb) for the Upper Scioto River watershed, 2009 & 2011.