Latest Tracking Poll Results Press Release September 22, 2020 Contact Information 2 Naming stage Rating stage Date of survey 31/8-1/9/2020 2-4/9/2020 Survey method Random telephone survey conducted by real interviewers Target population Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong residents aged 18 or above 508 (including 255 landline 500 (including 244 landline Sample size and 253 mobile samples) and 256 mobile samples) Effective response 61.4% 55.8% rate Sampling error of percentages not more than +/-4% and that of ratings not more Sampling error than +/-3.3 at 95% conf. level Rim-weighted according to figures provided by the Census and Statistics Department. The gender-age distribution of the Hong Kong population came from Weighting method “Mid-year population for 2019”, while the educational attainment (highest level attended) distribution and economic activity status distribution came from “Women and Men in Hong Kong - Key Statistics (2019 Edition)”. Survey Topic 3 Popularity of Executive Councillors Top 5 non-official Executive Councillors - Naming Top 5 non-official Executive Councillors - Rating Survey result - Popularity of Executive Councillors 4 Top 5 non-official Executive Councillors – Naming Executive Change in Rank 17-18/3/2020 31/8-1/9/2020 Change Councillors ranking 1 Regina Ip 32% 34% ▲2% -- 2 Bernard Chan 16% 15% ▼1% -- 3 Ronny Tong 12% 14% ▲2% -- 4 Tommy Cheung 4% 7% ▲3% * ▲1 5 Ip Kwok-him 3% 5% ▲1% ▲1 6 Lam Ching-choi 11% 4% ▼7% * ▼2 The naming survey showed that Regina Ip, Bernard Chan and Ronny Tong were named most frequently. However, 11% made a wrong attempt at citing non-official Executive Councillors while 55% had no clue. *Significant change Survey result - Popularity of Executive Councillors 5 各行政會議成員提名 - 綜合圖表 (按次計算) Naming rates of Executive Councillors - Combined (per poll) Regina Ip Bernard Chan Ronny Tong Tommy Cheung Ip Kwok-him Lam Ching-choi 40% 35% 34% 30% 25% 20% Percentage 15% 15% 百分比 14% 10% 7% 5% 5% 4% 0% 9/2017 3/2018 9/2018 3/2019 9/2019 3/2020 調查月份 Month of Survey Survey result - Popularity of Executive Councillors 6 Top 5 non-official Executive Councillors – Rating 19-20/3/2020 2-4/9/2020 Change Record Regina Ip 29.5 31.0 ▲1.5 Record high since Apr. 2019 Bernard Chan 31.1 29.5 ▼1.6 All-time record low since Jan. 2005 Ronny Tong 24.2 26.8 ▲2.6 Record high since Apr. 2019 Ip Kwok-him 24.6 26.7 ▲2.1 Record high since Apr. 2019 Tommy Cheung 24.7 26.6 ▲1.9 Record high since Sept. 2019 Lam Ching-choi 28.8 30.1 ▲1.3 All-time record high since Mar. 2020 The mean score obtained by these top 5 non-official Executive Councillors was 28.1 marks. In this latest survey, Lam Ching-choi obtained a support rating of 30.1 marks, but he was dropped due to his relatively low recognition rate. The rating of Bernard Chan has registered an all-time record low since 2005. Survey result - Popularity of Executive Councillors 7 各行政會議成員評分 - 綜合圖表 (按次計算) Ratings of Executive Councillors – Combined (per poll) Bernard Chan Regina Ip Tommy Cheung Ip Kwok-him Ronny Tong 60 50 Rating 40 評分 31.0 30 29.5 26.8 26.7 26.6 20 9/2012 9/2013 9/2014 9/2015 9/2016 9/2017 9/2018 9/2019 9/2020 調查月份 Month of Survey Community Democracy Project - Community Health Module Press Release September 22, 2020 Contact Information - PENRI 9 HKPOP Panel Date of survey September 7, 3pm – September 21, 3pm Survey method Online survey Target population Hong Kong residents aged 12+ Total sample size 13,350 Response rate 12.8% Sampling error Sampling error of percentages at +/-1% at 95% confidence level The figures are rim-weighted according to 1) gender-age distribution of Hong Kong population and by District Councils population figures from Weighting method Census and Statistics Department; 2) Voting results of District Councils Election from Registration and Electoral Office; 3) rating distribution of Chief Executive from regular tracking surveys. Survey Result - PENRI 10 Date of Publication 6/9 7/9 8/9 9/9 10/9 11/9 12/9 13/9 14/9 15/9 16/9 17/9 18/9 19/9 20/9 21/9 22/9 Imported Cases(Ytd) 0 6 1 3 1 7 9 4 8 2 4 4 3 1 9 19 4 Local Infection Cases(Ytd) 7 15 10 3 5 5 3 9 11 12 0 5 6 2 4 4 2 Post-Epidemic Work Resumption 41.3 6.9 10.5 43.9 43.6 15.1 15.1 15.1 11.9 11.9 / / / / / / / Index (PEWRI) Post-Epidemic Public-Facilities 41.3 11.3 15.1 43.1 42.3 16.9 17.0 16.8 13.2 13.2 / / / / / / / Re-open Index (PEPRI) Post-Epidemic Gathering 42.8 16.7 20.0 45.1 43.1 21.7 21.8 21.5 18.6 18.5 57.9 42.0 42.7 42.9 17.8 17.8 38.7 Resumption Index (PEGRI) Post-Epidemic Business 45.9 10.8 14.3 48.4 46.6 18.0 18.0 17.9 13.6 13.5 / / / / / / / Resumption PEBRI(catering) Survey Result - PENRI 11.