Linguistics and Literature Studies 7(4): 121-125, 2019 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2019.070401 Language as a Marker of Identity in Tiaret Speech Community Brahmi Mohamed*, Mahieddine Rachid, Bouhania Bachir Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Languages, University of Adrar, Algeria Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract This paper explores the linguistic behavior in In his analysis of British English speakers who reside in relation to the identity of speakers who stay in their the USA, Trudgill suggests that how, the extent to which, hometown and speakers who travel from one dialect region and why accommodation to American English occurs to another. Following the methodology of sociolinguistic appears to be due to several factors such as phonological variation studies, combined with qualitative analyses, this contrast and strength of stereotyping. Adopting insights study examines two noticeable linguistic features of Tiaret from these researchers, as well as taking language compared to those acquired by speakers who moved to ideologies into consideration, this study suggests factors other dialect areas. Qualitative analyses of speakers’ social that trigger or fail to trigger accommodation by speakers identities, attitudes and language practices match migrating to a new dialect area. quantitative analyses of patterns of phonological variation. Previous sociolinguistic research has detailed how The study finds that the migrant groups do make changes historical, political and sociolinguistic factors have in their linguistic production due to their continuous influenced issues of language, identity, and conflicts in exposure to a new dialect. Moreover, the findings suggest almost every country and in Algeria particularly, as stated that speakers’ linguistic behavior is noticeably related to by (Benrabah, 2007) in his The Language Planning their identities, social networks, language attitudes and the Situation in Algeria. Those studies have largely stressed wider sociopolitical framework in the whole country. language use in the larger macro social structure, focusing Keywords Identity, Phonological Variation, on language attitudes, language shift, and language use. Linguistic Behavior, Language Practices 2 . Language Variation and Change Language is defined as a system of doubly articulated 1 . Introduction signs, that is to say that the meaning-making is done at two levels of articulation: that of significant entities Ever since Labov’s (1963) early studies, sociolinguists (Morphemes and lexemes) forming statements and that of have considered language attitudes as one of the major distinctive units (phonemes) forming the signifying units. factors manipulating language variation and change. Since Ferdinand Saussure, one also distinguishes, the Implementing recent approaches to variation combined language and the word, which is the use and the with qualitative inquiry, this study explores the linguistic realization of the system of language by its speakers, as behavior and language ideologies of speakers who stayed for language, it is the human faculty implemented by in their hometown and those who migrated from one means of language. dialect to another in the sociocultural context of Speakers of commonly comprehensible dialects interact contemporary Algeria. and converse with each other, the dialects that are in Current developments in the field of sociolinguistic contact may be changed linguistically. When speakers of a variation view variation as a reflection of social agency particular dialect are exposed to another dialect in the long that constructs social meaning and considering how term, such as in the case of migration, these speakers may ideologies cooperate with internal linguistic restraints on adjust their speech to accommodate to the members of variation (Milroy 2004). local speech community and modify their pronunciation In his book Dialects in Contact, Trudgill (1986) of certain linguistic variables that are markers within the examines factors of long-term linguistic accommodation local community (Trudgill 1986). Gradually, they acquire by speakers moving to a different region from their own. a dialect other than their native dialect. 122 Language as a Marker of Identity in Tiaret Speech Community Language guarantees the social cohesion of the convergence, which is a process of people naturally community that speaks it, while becoming the container tending to adapt other communicators’ way of and place of social integration, literacy and acculturation; communicating to connect and decrease their social it is also necessary to remember that it creates solidarity differences. The other one is divergence, which is a with the past and history through the discourses carried by process of non-adaptation of communication this language; that is, one must associate the discourses characteristics and accentuation of social and nonverbal and the culture, if not how to explain that the Maghreb communication differences. and French cultures are not identical despite the use of the The people involved and situation of communication same language (French or Arabic) decide which accommodation process is used. If a person Another example of this situation can be borrowed from is interacting with another with very high standards, better Berber speakers who live in the non-Berber regions of at things and who seem to be powerful, then divergent Algeria where they use three different languages: Berber, characteristics are shown highlighting the differences. Algerian and French, changing from one language to Similarly, if the other person is perceived to be of same another or mixing them, more often in the same language. standard, people try to be like them creating a comfort This results from their acquisition of the rules and rules of zone for both. language use within these communities. In this regard, Gumperz, (1968:69) claims that a discourse community is one, all those whose members share at least one unique 3. Method variety and standards for its appropriate use. Data Collection Speech Accommodation Theory The research method employed in this paper is the In order to reach intelligibility and communicative Labovian Method that distinguished mainly between two efficiency, speakers may shift styles mainly in response to categories of variables: linguistic; morphological, lexical their audience; they regulate their speech towards their and phonological, and the social variables named; age, listeners if they wish to express or achieve solidarity. This gender and social class. In order to collect the data, we approach is rooted in a social psychological approach to have opted for analyzing only the phonological variables stylistic variation originally known as speech as we think they noticeably mark many speakers’ attitudes accommodation theory (Giles 1973). and identities in the city of Tiaret. The wilaya of Tiaret is The theory talks about speakers intending to depict their located in the north-west of the country. Geographically positive identity to others. They tend to match their own speaking, the city is bounded by several wilayas which vocabulary, accent and cadence as of other listeners. For makes it a heterogenous area of sociolinguistic research as instance, people adopt the slang their friends use to fit in. it is considered as the meeting point where other linguistic People talk differently using different words and gestures landscapes inevitably make constant contact. accordingly to the different group of people like old Two main groups are dealt with in the present paper; people, children, women, men, teens, rich, poor, powerful, speakers staying in their hometown, and those moving to weak, etc. another dialect area or district. To better-cover the Sociolinguists believe that speech accommodation research objectives, we have limited the sample and began as “a socio- psychological model of speech-style chosen university students to conduct the interviews. Fifty modifications”. It then developed into communication (50) local speakers spent their university career in Tiaret, accommodation theory in order to acknowledge that not and the same number (50) migrants who moved to only speech but other “communicative behavior” (Giles et Mostaganem University have carried on their studies and al., 2007:134), affect interpersonal or intergroup stayed in campus the whole university period. interaction, i.e. an individual’s speaker identity is The speakers’ speech data were gathered using constructed from interaction with varying social groups. sociolinguistic semi-structured interviews. Interviews are Each group constitutes a unique culture and social seen as the most commonly adopted approach among category. An individual’s membership of a social group sociolinguists to elicit the spontaneous vernacular usage will typically influence the individual’s linguistic choice. of speakers (Milroy & Gordon 2003). The conversations The individual will be a member of a group because he lasted about half an hour for the individual interviews and wishes to be part of the group. That is to say, in order to about an hour and a half for the group interviews. We minimize the social distance between that individual and have aimed at interviewing students to gain access to their the group he wishes to be part of, he will then have to vernacular speech and the primary