"Double Contour" Effect in the Long Bones of Newly Born Infants by N

"Double Contour" Effect in the Long Bones of Newly Born Infants by N

Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.26.130.543 on 1 December 1951. Downloaded from THE RADIOLOGICAL "DOUBLE CONTOUR" EFFECT IN THE LONG BONES OF NEWLY BORN INFANTS BY N. M. HANCOX, J. D. HAY, W. S. HOLDEN, P. D. MOSS, and A. S. WHITEHEAD From the Mill Road Maternity Hospital, Liverpool, and the Department of Physiology and Histology, University of Liverpool (RECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 5, 1951) The radiological appearance of a double contour Results on the sides of the long bones of infants has been A double contour effect was noted on the radio- noted by several writers since Chiari first drew graphs of the long bones as a single, continuous, attention to it in 1938. Many theories of its linear shadow running adjacent to the diaphysis on Protected by copyright. causation and significance have been advanced, its outer side, and separated from it by a radio- including the view that it may be due to organic translucent strip about 1 mm. in width (Figs. 1, 2, disease such as rickets or syphilis. Glaser, however, 3, 4). This thin, pencilled line, which was never in 1949 suggested that this appearance may be seen laminated, was limited to the diaphyseal portion in radiographs of normal, healthy bone, and that of the bone, and never extended beyond the its production depends on the angle of projection. metaphyseal region, at which point it merged with The results of the investigation described below the outline of the diaphysis. It was somewhat support his view that a double contour effect may variable in its extent and position, being visible on be seen in normal bones, but suggest that its origin both sides of some bones and on only one side of is in the histological structure of the bone itself others. In some it extended the whole length of the rather than in the technique of radiography. diaphysis while in others it was limited to a part of the shaft. Commonly, though by no means invariably, it was Investigation present in both limbs. In some cases it was very obvious, in others it had to be http://adc.bmj.com/ One hundred and seventeen infants, of whom the looked for carefully. Variation in the focal-film majority were premature, born in the Mill Road distance or in the angle of projection of the radio- Maternity Hospital, Liverpool, have been studied, graphs produced no difference in the appearance of 97 during life and 20 after death. Of the living the double contour. infants, 73 were regarded as healthy, 62 being Healthy Infants. The 73 healthy infants showed premature, with birth weights of 5 lb. 8 oz. or less, no physical signs of organic disease while under and 11 mature. Twenty-four were abnormal on observation. Blood alkaline phosphatase estima- account of congenital defects or acquired disease. tions in three revealed values within the normal on September 28, 2021 by guest. Each infant was examined physically while in range for infants (25, 22, and 27 King Armstrong hospital and subsequently after discharge. All were units), and in one the serum calcium level was radiographed before discharge from hospital, the 12-5 mg. and the phosphorus level 5 1 mg. per mature infants usually during the second week, and 100 ml. The mothers of all these infants were also the premature infants when the weight reached 5 lb. regarded as healthy, and had negative blood in the breast fed, and 5, lb. in those artificially fed. Wassermann reactions and/or Kahn tests. The radiographic examination included antero- The double contour effect was noted in one or posterior and lateral projection of the limbs, with more bones in 20 (27 %) of the 73 cases examined. oblique and tangential views when required. A Of these 14 (70%) showed the appearance in more rotating anode tube with a 1 mm. focal spot and than one bone. The bones most commonly affected non-screened films were used. The focal-film were the tibia and ulna, followed by the fibula, distance was usually 40 in. with KV 55, and Mas. 20. radius, femur, and humerus. No double contours 543 Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.26.130.543 on 1 December 1951. Downloaded from 544 ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD were seen in the ribs, clavicles, metatarsals, meta- TABLE 3 carpals, or phalanges. INCIDENCE OF DOUBLE CONTOUR EFFECT AT DIFFERENT The incidence of the double contour effect in BIRTH WEIGHTS individual bones is shown in Table 1. Number of Infants Per TABLE 1 Birth Weight Showing Double centage INCIDENCE OF THE DOUBLE CONTOUR EFFECT IN Contour cetg INDIVIDUAL BONES Under 3 lb .. .. 5 80 Number of Infants Bone Pretg Showing Double Contour Percentage 3Ib.-3 lb. 15 oz. .. 26 42 Tibia .. 15 22 4 lb.-4 lb. 15 oz. .. 27 26 Ulna .. 14 20 5 lb.-5 lb. 7 oz. .. 5 20 Fibula .. 9 12 5 lb. 8 oz.-5 lb. 15 oz. 3 None Femur 7. 10 6 lb. and over .. 7 None Radius .. 7 10 Humerus .. 2 3 one month, in others for longer periods up to eight months after the initial radiograph. As a rule, the more pronounced the change initially, the Protected by copyright. The incidence of the double contour effect in longer it persisted. We did not note its reappearance combinations of bones in the same patient is shown in any case serially radiographed, though such an in Table 2. occurrence would be quite compatible with our TABLE 2 histological studies. Nor did we see its later development as described Glaser in infants INCIDENCE OF DOUBLE CONTOUR EFFECT IN by whose COMBINATIONS OF BONES IN THE SAME PATIENTS initial films did not show the change. Abnormal Infants. The double contour effect Combination Number of Infants was noted in two (8 *4 %) of the 24 abnormal infants of Bones Showing Double Contour Percentage included in the investigation. 9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Of these infants, six had congenital Radius and deformities, Ulna .. 8 11 eight suffered from haemolytic disease, two showed radiological evidence suggestive of rickets, and five, Tibia and with their mothers, had positive blood Wassermann Fibula .. 6 8 and Kahn reactions. The double contour effect was http://adc.bmj.com/ Tibia, Fibula, seen in two of these five infants. It was not observed Radius, and in the other 22 cases. Ulna .. 2 3 The congenital deformities were anencephaly, encephalocoele,lacunar skull, spina bifida, achondro- plasia, and dyschondroplasia. The radiographs of The incidence of double contour effect in infants the bones in these cases revealed the appearances of varying maturity at birth is shown in Table 3 characteristic of the deformities. The bones of the where the infants are divided into groups according infants with haemolytic disease were of normal on September 28, 2021 by guest. to their birth weights. The high incidence of the appearance. In the two infants with rickets, aged effect in the infants of lowest birth weight is striking. 6 months and 11 months, the metaphyseal changes Amongst the healthy infants were four pairs of typical of the condition were seen. twins, two uniovular and two binovular. In one Of the five infants, all premature, whose blood of the uniovular pairs both infants showed double Wassermann and Kahn reactions were positive, the contour effect, in the other it was well marked in two in whom the double contour effect was seen one infant, but absent in the other. Of the binovular showed no radiological evidence of any other twins the effect was noted in both infants of one pair skeletal changes. The other three showed definite and in neither infant of the other pair. bone changes suggestive of syphilis in the form of Radiographs taken at intervals revealed that the osteochondritis, osteitis, and periostitis. These length of time the double contour effect persisted lesions tended to be multiple, affecting more than varied from infant to infant, remaining in some for one bone, and to be asymmetrical in distribution.- Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.26.130.543 on 1 December 1951. Downloaded from Protected by copyright. http://adc.bmj.com/ FIG. 3.-Marked double contour ettect limited to the inner side of the tibial shaft. [IG. 2. on September 28, 2021 by guest. FIG. 4.-Double contour effect most marked at the lower end of the anterior tibial shaft and in the middle of the posterior surface. Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.26.130.543 on 1 December 1951. Downloaded from FIG. 5.-Cross section of tibia of FIG. 6.-Cross section of control_ Case 72 (low power photomicro- bone. The vascular channels are graph). The arrow points to the smaller and more uniformly dis- Indian ink which had been injected persed, indicating a less concentratedProtected by copyright. in the region of the double contour. apposition of bone tissue. Note the porosity of the subadjacent V4 bone tissue resulting from the large, arciform, primitive vascular channels. FIG. 7.-Higher power view of tibia of Case 72. The outermost portion http://adc.bmj.com/ of the bone is shown. The tissue is normal and its appearance suggests rapid deposition. Histological Material Histology In order to determine the histological appearances In the first case examined histologically the tibia of the bones showing the double contour effect, and fibula were left in their natural relationship 4-' post-mortem material was obtained from 20 other with some adherent soft tissue. After fixation and on September 28, 2021 by guest. infants who had no known skeletal abnormality. decalcification a block of tissue was excised by The bones were removed and radiographed from transverse cuts in the mid-shaft region and was different angles to demonstrate the double contour embedded in paraffin wax.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us