Successful Visual Rehabilitation After Neonatal Penetrating Keratoplasty 645

Successful Visual Rehabilitation After Neonatal Penetrating Keratoplasty 645

644 British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997;81:644–648 Successful visual rehabilitation after neonatal Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.81.8.644 on 1 August 1997. Downloaded from penetrating keratoplasty Richard W Hertle, Stephen E Orlin Abstract As a result of clinical, behavioural, electro- Background—Penetrating keratoplasty in physiological, and anatomical studies of con- infancy and childhood has traditionally genital obstruction of vision clinicians now are met with limited visual success due to a aggressive at early establishment of a clear and combination of unique physiology and optically corrected visual axis. Surgical and technical problems in this patient popula- optical rehabilitation is performed within 1 tion. With the advances in microsurgical week of diagnosis in neonates and infants.18 instrumentation, corneal preservation, Amblyopia is treated with occlusion of the and visual developmental physiology oph- sound eye. This method of treatment has thalmologists are finding increasing indi- improved visual results in infants with congeni- cations for penetrating keratoplasty in the tal cataracts.18 We have used these treatment childhood population. The long term principles in the management of two patients results of neonatal penetrating kerato- with congenital corneal opacification with plasty in two patients with unilateral con- good results. genital corneal opacification are reported. Methods—Penetrating keratoplasty was performed on one eye in each of two Methods infants within the first 3 weeks of life. A retrospective analysis of clinical information Amblyopia treatment and optical therapy was obtained on the two patients who are the have been continued since surgery. subjects in this report. Clinical data included Results—After 6 years both grafts have all information obtained at surgery and outpa- remained clear. One patient developed the tient examinations. These data are summarised infantile esotropia syndrome. Visual de- below. velopment using Snellen optotypes is age normal for both transplanted eyes. Conclusions—Penetrating keratoplasty Patients when combined with optical correction CASE 1 and amblyopia therapy may restore and JG was born 1 month premature on 23 Febru- http://bjo.bmj.com/ preserve vision in selected patients with ary 1990 to a 24-year-old woman with a known congenital corneal opacification if per- history of mental retardation and strabismus formed in the neonatal period. who denied any use of drugs or health (Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:644–648) problems during her pregnancy. JG’s medical problems included tetralogy of Fallot, noctur- nal seizures with an asymmetric Todd’s paraly- Penetrating keratoplasty has a high success rate sis, and associated asymmetrically abnormal in the adult population.1 Technical challenges, electroencephalogram and developmental on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. an exuberant inflammatory response, amblyo- delay. She was first evaluated by us at 10 days pia, rejection, glaucoma, and treatment com- old, referred because of an abnormal red reflex pliance in neonatal and infant transplantation in both eyes. Examination at that time revealed have led some authors not to recommend sur- objection to light in both eyes. Both corneas gery for unilateral corneal opacities.2–8 had obvious opacification extending from the If the visual axis is congenitally obstructed inferior-nasal portion of the limbus in a wedge (ptosis, corneal opacification, cataract, vitreous shape with obscuration of the pupil on the right Children’s Hospital of haemorrhage, etc) and left untreated irrevers- and up to the border of the pupil on the left. Philadelphia and ible changes take place in the visual system There was no evidence of corneal oedema, Scheie Eye Institute, 910 University of serving that eye. The lateral geniculate and thinning, or vascularisation in either eye (Fig Pennsylvania, striate cortex suVer from anatomical and 1). Her cycloplegic refraction was +1.75 Philadelphia, USA physiological maldevelopment.11 Various visual sphere in both eyes The iris appeared normal R W Hertle functions (for example, grating acuity, recogni- and after dilatation of the pupils the lenses, vit- S E Orlin tion acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, reous, and retina appeared healthy. Correspondence to: accommodation, fusion, colour vision) may On 14 March 1990 at 19 days of age a pen- Richard W Hertle, MD, have diVerent ‘sensitive periods’ in etrating keratoplasty was performed on the Division of Ophthalmology, development.10 12 In human infants 1 week of right eye. The sclera was supported with a The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and monocular occlusion can result in severe Flieringa ring and a 7.0 mm graft was placed in Civic Center Boulevard, amblyopia at the peak period of a 6.5 mm host bed. The donor button was Philadelphia, PA 10104, susceptibility.13–15 Also in humans, neither con- secured with 16 interrupted 10–0 nylon USA. genital cataracts nor congenital esotropia sutures. She had an uneventful postoperative Accepted for publication produce permanent loss of acuity if treated course and was placed on Pred-G (pred- 1 May 1997 before 2 months of age.15–17 nisolone) ointment in the left eye four times Successful visual rehabilitation after neonatal penetrating keratoplasty 645 She did not return again until 6 August 1990 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.81.8.644 on 1 August 1997. Downloaded from at which time she underwent an examination under anaesthesia. Her intraocular pressure was 6.0 mm Hg in both eyes under light anaes- thesia with pneumotonography. Her corneal diameters were 10.0 mm horizontal (H) by 9.0 mm vertical (V) right eye and 10.5 mm H by 9.5 mm V left eye There was ciliary injection in the right eye. The graft had an endothelial rejection line from the 5:00 position to the 10:00 position with stromal and epithelial oedema occupying the inferolateral half of the graft. There were vessels around two sutures at the 5 o’clock and 6 o’clock positions from the host cornea into the graft superficially. All sutures were removed at this time. The anterior chamber, lens, vitreous, and fundus examin- ation was normal. A subconjunctival injection of Decadron (dexamethasone) 5 mg/0.5 ml was given. The foster parents were instructed to instil prednisolone acetate 1% solution in the right eye every hour during the day and Pred-G ointment at night. On 21 August 1990 she returned with a thin, clear graft and no evidence of rejection. Her cycloplegic refraction was +3.50 +2.25 × 65 right eye and +4.00 +1.75 × 180 left eye. She Figure 1 Right eye (photograph developed from negative was continued on a tapering regimen of steroid in reverse) of patient JG at 19 days of age showing corneal drops. On 26 September 1990 she had a stable opacification present before surgery. examination with CSM gaze and orthophoria at near and a clear graft. Teller grating acuity daily and atropine 0.5% left eye twice daily. cards were performed for the first time and The parents were instructed to begin patching showed approximate Snellen acuities to be the left eye 4–5 waking hours a day. 20/300 right eye (one octave below normal for Pathological analysis of the corneal button age) and 20/200 left eye (normal for age). The removed during surgery showed disorganisa- parents were instructed to stop the steroid tion of stromal lamellae with scattered vessels drops and patch the left eye all but 1 hour a day and absence of Descemet’s membrane within and return in 2 weeks. the area of stromal opacification, consistent On 19 December 1990, now 10 months old, http://bjo.bmj.com/ with a diagnosis of corneal dysgenesis. she returned and her examination was un- On 3 April 1990 the patient had an uncom- changed except for the appearance of typical plicated repair of her cardiovascular abnormal- congenital nystagmus and a small angle ity. She was examined on 13 April 1990 and intermittent esotropia. The graft was clear and she had fixation with poor following in both her cycloplegic refraction was +2.00 +3.00 × eyes but central steady and maintained (CSM) 85 right eye and +1.00 +1.75 × 95 left eye. Her gaze in both eyes The graft was thin, clear, and parents were given a prescription for glasses completely epithelialised without vascularisa- and instructed to continue patching the left eye on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. tion. Refraction was +1.00 +1.00 × 10 in the for half her waking hours. right atropinised eye. Pred-G ointment, atro- She did not return for evaluation until 13 pine, and patching were continued. May 1991, now 15 months old. She was on no She returned for examination on 11 May ocular medicines. She had CSM gaze in both 1990 with CSM gaze in both eyes and no eyes with an 18–20 prism dioptres esotropia change in the ocular examination except a and a left eye preference on cover/uncover test- small angle esotropia. The cycloplegic refrac- ing. She also had bilateral dissociated vertical tion was +1.75 +2.25 × 35 right eye and +1.75 deviation, overaction of the inferior obliques, sphere left eye She was scheduled for examin- and a nystagmus pattern typical of congenital ation under anaesthesia and suture removal nystagmus with a latent component or mani- and the parents were instructed to continue fest latent nystagmus. The graft was thin and with patching, atropine, and Pred-G ointment. clear without any evidence of new vascularisa- Because of a diYcult family environment tion, scarring, or rejection. The remainder of with the child being transferred to foster care her examination was normal. A cycloplegic she was not examined again until 20 June refraction was +2.00 +1.00 × 90 right eye, 1990. She was now on no medicines and had +3.00 +0.50 × 160 left eye.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us