The development of an icon for a Reformed liturgy in a South African context By Fay Clare van Eeden 20193069 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree: MTh (Practical Theology) In the Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria Supervisor: Prof Cas Wepener Pretoria November 2018 Room 4-1.7, Level 4, Building Univ ersity of Pretoria, Private Bag X20 Hatf ield 0028, South Africa Tel +27 (0)12 420 1234 Fax +27 (0)12 420 5678 Email [email protected] www.up.ac.za “Experiences of beauty, whether in nature or in art, are among the most precious and powerful given to us. Beauty has the strange effect of at once beckoning us to itself and pointing beyond itself to that which seems tantalizingly unattainable. It draws us to itself and through itself…If God is the giver of all good gifts and contains within Himself all possible perfections, then He must be beauty as much as He is goodness and truth.” − Richard Harries Dedicated to Anna-Marie Bands Gifted iconographer, teacher and mentor i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my wonderful husband Peet van Eeden for his encouragement, advice and the meals he prepared for me while was working on this dissertation. Thank you to my family and friends for all your support during these two years. A special thank you to my study buddy, Leanie Lemmer, for the many hours together in the library. Francisca du Randt – thank you for patiently combing through my work for mistakes. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the DRC Lynnwood and Stellastraat congregations for making this academic journey possible. To the church councils thank you for the financial support. My colleagues – thank you for your patience. A special thanks to my ‘Nuwe Generasie’-family for taking the ministry-reins when I couldn’t. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude toward two great teachers and mentors. Anna-Marie Bands – thank you for not only teaching me how to write icons, but also for sharing your love and passion for Byzantine icons with me. Secondly, I am very grateful to my supervisor Cas Wepener. Thank you not only for your guidance and the good questions you ask, but also for being so patient with me. Soli Deo Gloria! ii DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA The Department of Practical Theology places great emphasis upon integrity and ethical conduct in the preparation of all written work submitted for academic evaluation. While academic staff teach you about referencing techniques and how to avoid plagiarism, you too have a responsibility in this regard. If you are at any stage uncertain as to what is required, you should speak to your lecturer before any written work is submitted. You are guilty of plagiarism if you copy something from another author’s work (eg a book, an article or a website) without acknowledging the source and pass it off as your own. In effect you are stealing something that belongs to someone else. This is not only the case when you copy work word-for-word (verbatim), but also when you submit someone else’s work in a slightly altered form (paraphrase) or use work previous ly produced by another student. You are also not allowed to let anybody copy your work with the intention of passing it off as his/her work. Students who commit plagiarism will not be given any credit for plagiarised work. The matter may also be referred to the Disciplinary Committee (Students) for a ruling. Plagiarism is regarded as a serious contravention of the University’s rules and can lead to expulsion from the University. The declaration which follows must accompany all written work submitted while you are a student of the Department of Theology. No written work will be accepted unless the declaration has been completed and attached. Full names of student: Fay Clare van Eeden Student number: 20193069 Topic of work: The development of an icon for a Reformed liturgy in a South African context Declaration 1. I understand what plagiarism is and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this dissertation is my own original work. Where other people’s work has been used (either from a printed source, Internet or any other source), this has been properly acknowledged and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. 3. I have not used work previously produced by another student or any other perso n to hand in as my own. 4. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work. SIGNATURE: Fay Clare van Eeden iii ABSTRACT The last decade has been characterized by a changing ritual landscape which inevitably brings about a change in the expression of worship and liturgy. This changing landscape can be seen in the growing interest in Orthodox icons. The Reformed tradition runs the risk of becoming irrelevant should it ignore this changing landscape and the needs it brings about regarding other forms of spirituality and ways of experiencing God. For this reason the researcher wished to explore the importance and place of icons in the liturgical and spiritual life of the Orthodox tradition, so as to develop an icon that can be used in a Reformed liturgy. The Practical Theology framework of Richard Osmer guides this research. The importance of rituals and symbols in the liturgy is discussed keeping liturgical inculturation and the significance of aesthetics and art in people’s religious experience in mind. The research explores iconography and the role icons play in the Orthodox spirituality and liturgy at length. Using a well-known icon as example the process of reading and writing icons is explained. The research also attends to icons from the Coptic and Ethiopian Orthodoxy. The research attempts to give a comparison regarding the liturgies of the Reformed and Orthodox tradition. With all this in mind an icon-enriched Reformed liturgy is proposed. With liturgical inculturation and the South African context in mind an icon and accompanying liturgical element is developed in this study. The researcher is of opinion that the icon and creed that is presented in this study will enrich a Reformed liturgy in South Africa. iv KEY TERMS 1. Practical Theology 2. Liturgy 3. Orthodox tradition and liturgy 4. Reformed tradition and liturgy 5. Icons and iconography 6. Iconoclasm 7. Iconostasis 8. Liturgical inculturation 9. Dynamic equivalence 10. Creative assimilation 11. Bricolage liturgy 12. Convergence liturgy 13. Shweshwe 14. Ubuntu LIST OF ICONS & PHOTOGRAPHS 1. The Coptic icon of Christ and St. Menas……………………………………………….…43 2. The Ethiopian icon Crucifixion………………………………………………………….….45 3. The Hodegetria………………………………………………………………………..……..48 4. The first few stages of writing the Christ Pantocrator icon………………………………52 5. Colour pigments and egg tempera………………………………………………..……….53 6. Traditional iconostasis……………………………………………………………………....63 7. Anna-Marie Bands’ contemporary icon Jesus accepts the cross…………………...….75 8. The shweshwe fabric used on the developed icon’s frame……………………...……...79 9. Icon developed for this study Jesus Christ accepts the cross…………………………..82 v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………...…………..i Declaration of originality…………………………………………………………………………iii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………...iv Key terms and list of icons………………………………………………………………...…….v 1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.....………………………………………………..……..... 1 1.1 Preface……………………………………………………………………………………1 1.2 A changing landscape…………………………………………………...……………...2 1.3 Literature overview and research gap…………………………………………...…….3 1.4 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………...4 1.5 Overview of the research structure…………………………………………..………..4 2. CHAPTER 2: THEORY AND METHODOLOGY………………………………....……….6 2.1 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………...6 2.2 Practical Theology…………………………………………………………………........6 2.3 Liturgical Studies…………………………………………………………………………8 2.3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………8 2.3.2 The influence of the liturgical movement in South Africa……………...……10 2.3.3 Liturgy, culture and globalisation…………………………………………….....13 2.3.4 Rituals and symbols…………………………………………………..…………13 2.3.5 Moving forward……………………………………………………………...……15 2.4 Liturgical inculturation………………………………………………………………….16 2.4.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………….........16 2.4.2 Historical development of liturgical inculturation………………………...……17 2.4.3 David Bosch on liturgical inculturation……………………………………...….19 2.4.4 Postmodern challenges to liturgical inculturation……………………………..20 2.5 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….22 3. CHAPTER 3: THE IMPORTANCE OF AESTHETICS IN THE RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE…………………………………………………………………………………..23 3.1 Aesthetics and Theology………………………………………………………………23 3.2 Clarification of terms………………………………………………………………...…24 3.2.1 Aesthetics………………………………………………………………………..23 3.2.2 Art…………………………………………………………………………………25 vi 3.3 Aesthetics and art within a theological framework………………………………….25 3.4 Aesthetics and liturgy…………………………………………...…………………......27 3.4.1 The inescapability of aesthetics………………………………………...…......28 3.4.2 The upsurge of a culture of images……………………………………….......28 3.5 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………29 4. CHAPTER 4: ICONS AND ICONOGRAPHY………………………………………...30 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………......30 4.2 The emergence of the Orthodox tradition and the place of icons within it…...…..30 4.3 The Iconoclastic Controversy………………………………………...……………….33 4.4 The iconoclasm of the Reformation…………………………………...…………......36 4.4.1 Martin Luther………………………………………………...………………......36