BRIEFING PAPER Number 08085, 11 September 2017 Committee of Selection By Richard Kelly 1. Motions to appoint a Selection Committee (12 September 2017) On 12 September 2017, the House is expected to debate a number of motions in relation to the appointment of a new select committee for the duration of this Parliament. The Committee, to be called the Selection Committee, is to have many of the functions of the Committee of Selection. Like the Committee of Selection in the last Parliament, it will have nine members, all but one of whom are whips from the Government, Official Opposition and second largest opposition party. 2. Role and operation of the Committee of Selection The Committee of Selection meets weekly in private to nominate Members to serve on Private Bill Committees and General Committees, which include Public Bill Committees, European Committees and Delegated Legislation Committees. Standing Order No 86 states that “In nominating such Members the Committee of Selection shall have regard to the qualifications of those Members nominated and to the composition of the House”.1 These nominations are not subject to approval by the House, and are reported in the Votes and Proceedings on the day the Committee of Selection’s decision. The Committee of Selection also considers nominations of members to the majority of select committees (excluding committee chairs, who are directly elected by the whole House). Nominations for select committees (departmental and non-departmental), unlike other nominations, are subject to approval by the House. At least two sitting days’ notice has to be given before the House can be asked to approve a motion to nominate a Member or Members to a select committee.2 The Committee of Selection normally meets on Wednesdays, Motions therefore appear on the remaining orders (Future Business) on 1 Committee of Selection, Committee of Selection and membership of general committees, Memorandum from the Committee of Selection for the Procedure Committee’s inquiry into the Committee of Selection and Membership of General Committees (P26), September 2013, para 1 2 House of Commons, Standing Orders of the House of Commons – Public Business, 2015, March 2015, HC 1154 2014-15, Standing Order No 121 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Committee of Selection Thursdays, and the earliest time the House can be asked to agree them will usually then be the following Monday. The Committee appoints Opposed Bill Committees (S.O. 111(1)) as well as the Unopposed Bill Panel, from which members for unopposed bill committees are drawn (S.O. 111(2)). It also appoints the Standing Orders Committee (S.O.103) and two Members of the Panel of Chairs whom the Speaker consults before certifying a bill to be a money bill (under the Parliament Act 1911). Box 1: Origins of the Committee of Selection The Committee is appointed under Standing Orders relating to private business because the Committee was first created to appoint private bill committees. Between the 1860s and 1930s, there were about two hundred private bills per annum, and appointing committees to consider these bills was a considerable task. From the 1880s, the Committee of Selection was charged with the appointment of general committees (until recently called standing committees). With the creation of modern day departmental select committees in 1979, the Committee took on the role of nominating members to these committees also. 3. Composition of committees As noted above, generally, the Committee of Selection is required to follow precedents that ensure that committees appointed by it reflect the composition of the House. 3.1 What happens when the Government does not have a majority? There have been three occasions in relatively recent history when the Government had no majority. After the February 1974 election, the Government did not have a majority. Even number of government and opposition members were appointed to committees. In October 1974, the Labour Government secured a narrow majority at the election. Having lost its majority by April 1976, in May 1976 it accepted that it was no longer entitled to a majority on committees. In January 1995, following the suspension of a number of Members, the Conservative Party technically lost its majority but argued that as it had not lost seats at by-elections or as a result of defections, it should continue to have a majority on committees. February 1974 After the general election of February 1974 the Labour Government did not have a majority in the House. However, the House appointed a “normal” Committee of Selection, with 11 members and a Government majority of one, and it appointed a Government Chair. This Committee of Selection appointed standing committees with even numbers of members split equally between Government and Opposition. Since, in line with precedent, the Chair of these committees would cast his/her vote in favour of the status quo, in the event of a tied vote, this effectively meant that amendments and new clauses could not succeed in committee against the Government’s will. Likewise, votes on clause stand part would succeed. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 11 September 2017 May 1976 After the general election of October 1974 the Labour Government had a majority, but it lost this in April 1976. Labour had been elected with a majority of three (and a lead over the Conservatives of 42). However, it lost a by-election, suffered two defections to the Scottish Labour Party, and then the repudiation of the Whip by John Stonehouse. This left it with no overall majority in the House. The Government eventually conceded the principle that only a majority on the floor of the House should guarantee a majority in standing committee. On 7 May 1976 it brought forward a motion to this effect, to which the House agreed. This is often referred to as the “Harrison motion” after the Deputy Chief Whip who moved it: Nomination of Standing Committees Resolved, That this House recommends that in this Parliament the Committee of Selection should interpret Standing Order No. 62(2) so that only an overall majority in the composition of the House should guarantee a majority in each Standing Committee and that this should apply to all Bills in relation to which the Committee stage has not been entered upon.—[Mr. Walter Harrison.]3 The motion was agreed to without debate or division, the matter having previously been debated on a motion for the adjournment4. The issue arose after the nominations made by the Committee of Selection on 28 April 1976. In that Parliament the Committee had nine Members, with a Government majority and a Government Chair. Despite the Labour Party not having a majority in the House of Commons, the Committee of Selection gave it a majority on standing committees nominated that day, all of which had an odd number of members.5 This was raised at Prime Minister’s Questions the following day by Margaret Thatcher, leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Thorpe, leader of the Liberal Party, and William Whitelaw.6 At Business Questions that day, 29 April 1976, the Leader of the House announced that there would be a “Debate on appointments by the Committee of Selection”, on the Adjournment. Again both Thatcher and Thorpe questioned the Government’s approach.7 The Adjournment debate was held on Monday 3 May 1976.8 The following day, the death of the Chair of the Committee of Selection, Hugh Delargy, was announced. This meant that the Government lost control of the Committee of Selection. 3 HC Deb 07 May 1976 c1738 4 HC Deb 3 May 1976 cc983-1025 5 The issue was raised at Prime Minister’s Questions and at Business Questions on 29 April, see HC Deb 29 April 1976 cc551-553 and HC Deb 29 April 1976 cc557-559, respectively. 6 HC Deb 29 April 1976 cc551-553 7 HC Deb 29 April 1976 cc557-559 8 HC Deb 3 May 1976 cc983-1025 4 Committee of Selection January 1995 After the 1992 election the Conservatives had a majority in the House, but this was reduced in the course of the Parliament. Following the withdrawal of the Whip from nine “Maastricht rebels” who rebelled over the European Communities (Finance) Bill 1994-95 in November 1994, the Government no longer had an absolute majority subject to the party whip. On 11 January 1995 the House agreed the following motion: Resolved, That, unless and until the party which achieved an overall majority of Members elected at the preceding general election loses that majority either as a result of by-elections or through the secession of Members to another party the Committee of Selection shall interpret paragraph (2) of Standing Order No. 86 (Nomination of standing committees) in such a way as to give that party a majority on any standing committee.9 9 HC Deb 11 January 1995 cc157-201 About the Library The House of Commons Library research service provides MPs and their staff with the impartial briefing and evidence base they need to do their work in scrutinising Government, proposing legislation, and supporting constituents. As well as providing MPs with a confidential service we publish open briefing papers, which are available on the Parliament website. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publically available research briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated or otherwise amended to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing only with Members and their staff. If you have any general questions about the work of the House of Commons you can email [email protected].