Electromagnetic Radial Forces in a Hybrid Eight-Stator-Pole, Six-Rotor-Pole Bearingless Switched-Reluctance Motor Carlos R

Electromagnetic Radial Forces in a Hybrid Eight-Stator-Pole, Six-Rotor-Pole Bearingless Switched-Reluctance Motor Carlos R

Electromagnetic Radial Forces in a Hybrid Eight-Stator-Pole, Six-Rotor-Pole Bearingless Switched-Reluctance Motor Carlos R. Morrison, Mark W. Siebert, and Eric J. Ho s Abstract—Analysis and experimental measurement of the A0 Common cross-sectional area between aligned electromagnet force loads on the hybrid rotor in a novel rotor and stator pole, 2×10–4 m2 bearingless switched-reluctance motor (BSRM) have been performed. A BSRM has the combined characteristics of a B Flux density (T) switched-reluctance motor and a magnetic bearing. The BSRM c has an eight-pole stator and a six-pole hybrid rotor, which is Bk Flux density between stator pole k and circular composed of circular and scalloped lamination segments. The rotor lamination stack (T) hybrid rotor is levitated using only one set of stator poles. A Bs Flux density between stator pole k and scalloped second set of stator poles imparts torque to the scalloped portion k of the rotor, which is driven in a traditional switched reluctance rotor lamination stack (T) manner by a processor. Analysis was done for nonrotating rotor c Ek Energy density between stator pole k and circular poles that were oriented to achieve maximum and minimum 2 radial force loads on the rotor. The objective is to assess whether rotor laminations (J/m ) simple one-dimensional magnetic circuit analysis is sufficient for s Ek Energy density between stator pole k and preliminary evaluation of this machine, which may exhibit strong scalloped rotor laminations (J/m2) three-dimensional electromagnetic field behavior. Two magnetic c circuit geometries, approximating the complex topology of the Fk Magnetic force between circular lamination stack magnetic fields in and around the hybrid rotor, were employed in and stator pole k (N) formulating the electromagnetic radial force equations. s Reasonable agreement between the experimental results and the Fk Magnetic force between scalloped lamination theoretical predictions was obtained with typical magnetic stack and stator pole k (N) bearing derating factors applied to the predictions. Fm Magnetic force (N) Index Terms—Bearingless motor, electromagnetic device, F c Net downward magnetic force on circular rotor hybrid motor, magnetic field calculation, and switched- net reluctance motor.* lamination stack (N) s Fnet Net downward magnetic force on scalloped rotor I. NOMENCLATURE lamination stack (N) c c A0 Common cross-sectional area between a stator F Magnetic force on circular rotor lamination due 2 Tlower() pole and circular lamination stack (m ) to stator poles 1, 2, and 8 (N) s s 2 s Aa Average of Ab and Ac (m ) FTlower() Magnetic force on scalloped rotor lamination due s Ab Face area of stator pole 1 defined by length of to stator poles 1, 2, and 8 (N) scalloped segment, 2×10–4 m2 FT(net_lev) Total net magnetic levitating force on the rotor s s Ac Surface area inside scallop cavity, rθ L , (N) –4 2 4.35×10 m F c Total net magnetic levitation force on the Tnetlev()_ c circular rotor lamination due to stator poles 1, 2, Ak Common cross-sectional area between stator pole k and circular lamination stack (m2) 4, 5, 6, and 8 (N) s F s Total net magnetic levitation force on the Ak Common cross-sectional area between stator Tnetlev()_ pole k and scalloped lamination stack (m2) scalloped rotor lamination due to stator poles 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 (N) Manuscript received February 23, 2007. Ft(net) Total net downward magnetic radial force on Carlos R. Morrison is with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 U.S.A. (phone: rotor (N) 216–433–8447; fax: 216–977–7051; e-mail: [email protected]). s Mark W. Siebert is with the University of Toledo, Cleveland, OH 44135 Funet_ Net downward magnetic radial force on the U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]). unaligned scallop segment (Fig. 10) (N) Eric J. Ho was a summer intern at NASA Glenn Research Center and is now at University of Texas, Arlington, TX (email: [email protected]).* 1 s Ft(u_net) Total net downward magnetic radial force on R0 Nominal reluctance at the scalloped segment unaligned rotor (N) (1/H) c s FTupper() Magnetic force on circular rotor lamination due R5_ratio Reluctance ratio at pole 5 to stator poles 5, 4, and 6 (N) c R& Parallel reluctance at circular rotor lamination s FTupper() Magnetic force on scalloped rotor lamination due stack (1/H) to stator poles 5, 4, and 6 (N) s R& Parallel reluctance at scalloped lamination stack g General gap width (m) (1/H) ga Average stator-rotor gap spacing at stator pole 1 r Outer radius of rotor laminations (m) or 5 (Fig. 10) (m) v Flux volume between stator pole and rotor (m3) gb Gap length between a corner edge of the salient c Vk Flux volume between stator pole k and circular stator pole 1 (Fig. 10) and either of its adjacent rotor laminations (m3) rotor salient pole corner edges (m) s Vk Flux volume between stator pole k and scalloped gc Gap length between the midpoint of pole face 1 3 or 5 (Fig. 10) and the base of its adjacent scallop rotor laminations (m ) cavity (m) wm Magnetic energy (J) wc Magnetic energy between stator pole k and g Gap width at stator pole k (m) k k circular rotor laminations (J) –4 g0 Nominal gap width, 5×10 (m) s wk Magnetic energy between stator pole k and i Current (A) scalloped rotor laminations (J) x Rotor vertical displacement from nominal ik Current in coil k (A) c position (m) L Circular rotor lamination stack length, c 5.88×10–3 m φk Magnetic flux between stator pole k and circular laminations (Wb) Ls Scalloped rotor lamination stack length, φ s Magnetic flux between stator pole k and 1.94×10–2 m k scalloped laminations (Wb) –2 ltw Tooth width, 1.03×10 m φk Magnetic flux at stator pole k (Wb) –7 n Number of turns in coil, 215 μ0 Permeability of free space, 4π×10 H/m Pk Permeance at stator pole k (H) II. INTRODUCTION Pc Permeance between stator pole k and the circular k There is a need for reliable, fail-safe, robust, compact, low- rotor lamination stack (H) cost electric motors for applications with high temperatures or s Pk Permeance between stator pole k and the extreme temperature variations; switched-reluctance motors scalloped rotor lamination stack (H) possess these characteristics [1]. These motors have been evaluated as high-speed starter-generators [2] and [3]. P Sum of permeances (H) T However, conventional switched-reluctance motors can suffer c PT Sum of permeances at the circular laminations from undesired vibration due to (1) unbalanced lateral forces (H) on the rotor caused by electrical faults, (2) mechanical offset s of the rotor, and (3) uncontrolled pulsed current in one or PT Sum of permeances at the scalloped laminations (H) more shorted coils [4]. A viable solution for mitigating mechanical vibration is to suspend the rotor magnetically via c Rk Reluctance between stator pole k and circular self-levitation. In addition, magnetic suspension of the rotor lamination stack (1/H) allows the motor to operate at much higher rotational s frequency for a prolonged period. This benefit is due largely to Rk Reluctance between stator pole k and scalloped lamination stack (1/H) the elimination of friction, as there is no physical contact between the stator and rotor. Consequently, motors c RT Total reluctance at circular rotor lamination stack incorporating magnetic bearings perform at higher efficiency (1/H) than motors incorporating ball bearings. Self-levitation also s obviates the need for a lubrication system, which has the RT Total reluctance at aligned rotor scalloped lamination stack (1/H) added benefit of significantly decreasing the weight and s complexity of turbomachinery mechanisms. RT1 Total reluctance at scallop cavity through pole 1 (Fig. 10) (1/H) 2 Methods for simultaneously levitating and rotating a rotor proportional-derivative (P-D) algorithm was used to levitate within a single stator in switched-reluctance motors have been the nonrotating rotor. The rotor was then vertically displaced proposed in [5] and [6]. In these motors, the technique of using a fixture containing a load cell, and the stator coil using differential stator windings was employed. The studies currents and force exerted on the rotor were recorded for each in [5] and [6] center primarily around the use of a main four- displacement value. In the corresponding analysis, the pole winding to rotate an eight-pole rotor while utilizing a measured currents were utilized directly, thus making the two-pole winding to apply radial force to the rotor with all of calculations independent of the control law. The question this the 12 stator poles having both windings thereon. A variation paper now seeks to answer is, can one successfully apply one- on this theme was described in [7], wherein only a single coil dimensional magnetic field analysis to the complex three- on each stator pole (in a 12/8 stator-rotor pole configuration) dimensional hybrid rotor to obtain the associated was employed to achieve motor-bearing action. electromagnetic radial force? Self-levitation (also called self-bearing) of motors has been A. Derivation of General Magnetic Force Equation achieved for nearly every type of electric motor, but is very marginal in performance for switched-reluctance motors with Fig. 2 depicts a portion of the rotor and a portion of a stator low numbers of poles. The motoring technique disclosed in [8] tooth on which the stator coil is energized to produce a will simultaneously levitate and rotate a rotor, not only for magnetic field flux density B.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us