Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Acromioplasty in Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Acromioplasty in Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

54 Acta Orthop. Belg., 2018 84, 54-61 SUN ET AL. ORIGINAL STUDY Systematic review and Meta-analysis on acromioplasty in arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears Zhengyu SUN, Weili FU, Xin TANG, Gang CHEN, Jian LI From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic INTRODUCTION review and meta-analysis including all available randomized controlled trials to determine the role of Since Neer (25) and Bigliani (4) reported the role acromioplasty in arthroscopic repair of full-thickness of anterior acromioplasty for chronic impingement rotator cuff tears. syndrome, many authors demonstrated consistent A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, satisfactory outcomes after acromioplasty for Cochrane, and Web of Science. All randomized and the treatment of various rotator cuff tears and quasi-randomized controlled trials evaluating the impingement syndrome (5,11). The possible benefits outcomes of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with or without acromioplasty of acromioplasty for rotator cuff repair are based were included in our meta-analysis. After the studies on the theory of extrinsic subacromial impingement were selected by two reviewers, data were collected that acromial morphology is the initial factor and extracted independently. Data were pooled for contributing to abrasion of the rotator cuff and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) eventual rupture (3,4). Subacromial decompression score, Constant-Murley (CM) score, University of as described by Ellman (9), including bursectomy, California-Los Angeles (UCLA) score, visual analog coracoacromial ligament release, and anterior- scale (VAS) for pain and reoperation rate. inferior acromioplasty, is believed to relieve extrinsic, Five prospective randomized studies involving 465 primary impingement by increasing the height of patients were included. The current meta-analysis subacromial space (27). Therefore, subacromial did not show any significant difference between decompression has become the mainstay of surgical acromioplasty and nonacromioplasty groups with treatment for rotator cuff disorders. regard to the outcomes for ASES score, CM score, UCLA score (P = .17, .05, and .13, respectively). There was also no significant difference in VAS for pain and n reoperation rate between the two groups (P = .87, and Zhengyu Sun,. n Weili Fu. .57, respectively). n Xin Tang On the basis of the currently available evidence, there n Gang Chen. was no statistically significant difference in clinical n Jian Li. outcomes for patients undergoing arthroscopic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. short-term follow-up. Correspondence : Jian Li, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Keywords : Rotator cuff repair ; acromion ; acromioplasty ; Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, China subacromial decompression ; functional outcomes. E-mail : [email protected] © 2018, Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. No benefits or funds were received in support of this study. ActaThe authorsOrthopædica report Belgica,no conflict Vol. of 84 interests. - 1 - 2018 Acta Orthopædica Belgica, Vol. 84 - 1 - 2018 Sun.indd 54 8/11/18 12:36 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS ON ACROMIOPLASTY 55 However, the superiority of subacromial Types of participants decompression, especially acromioplasty is still under debate, although the incidence of Patients aged 18 years or older who were acromioplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff diagnosed with a full-thickness tear of at least 1 rotator cuff tendon were eligible for inclusion. repair has significantly increased recently (33,34). The potential disadvantages of subacromial The primary outcome of interest was a commonly decompression include weakening of the deltoid used functional score for rotator cuff disease, origin and acromioclavicular joint, anterosuperior American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) instability of the glenohumeral joint, and the score (20). The secondary outcomes of interest were formation of adhesions between the undersurface the other functional scores, including University of acromion and rotator cuff that may limit range of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) score (2) and Constant-Murley (CM) score (8). Visual analog of motion (12). Furthermore, several studies have confirmed that rotator cuff tears are caused by scale (VAS) for pain and reoperation rate were also aging and intrinsic overloading rather than the included in the outcomes of interest. Two reviewers (Z. Sun and W. Fu) independently extrinsic impingement (6,29). The purpose of this study was to perform a evaluated each of the relevant studies for eligibility systematic review and meta-analysis of all available for full review on the basis of titles and abstracts. level I and II randomized controlled trials comparing Disagreement was resolved by discussion and the outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic consensus. The reviewers were not blinded to the repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with titles of journals or the names of authors of any or without acromioplasty. We hypothesized that evaluated studies. there would be no significant difference between Two researchers separately extracted data, and acromioplasty and nonacromioplasty groups in the data were pooled for a meta-analysis. In terms terms of clinical outcomes. of data abstraction, it included study characteristics, patient demographics, tear size, acromion type, MATERIALS AND METHODS procedure details, and functional outcomes. All the extracted data were pooled for statistical analysis The systematic review and meta-analysis was with the use of RevMan software 5.3 (Cochrane conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Collaboration, London, UK, 2014). Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta- For continuous outcomes (ie, ASES, VAS), the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence Analysis) statement (22). We performed a literature search with the search terms “acromioplasty,” intervals (CI) was calculated. For binary variables “subacromial decompression,” and “rotator cuff” (ie, reoperation rate), the relative treatment effect with the limits “randomized controlled trials” using was reported as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. PubMed (1950 to January 2015), Embase (1978 to The degree of heterogeneity was investigated with January 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of the Cochrane χ2 test and quantified with the I2 Controlled Trials (up to January 2015), and Web of statistic. An I2 of less than 50% was the cutoff Science (1977 to January 2015). All of the retrieved for homogeneity of the data using a fixed-effects articles were screened for potential studies. When model, justifying pooling. Otherwise, a random necessary, the authors were contacted for a complete effects model was applied if I2 of more than 50% manuscript or data confirmation. and heterogeneity was significant. Results for all All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled analyses were considered significant at P values < trials (level I and II studies) that compared the clinical 0.05. outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with or without acromioplasty were included. Acta Orthopædica Belgica, Vol. 84 - 1 - 2018 Sun.indd 55 8/11/18 12:36 56 SUN ET AL. RESULTS 56.8 to 60.3 years. The mean follow-up period was between 15.6 and 35 months, and the follow-up rate The process for the search strategy was summarized ranged from 79.1% to 100%. in Figure 1. The literature search produced a total of ASES score was reported in 4 studies (1,10, 342 titles and abstracts including duplicates. After 17,30). Pooled analysis presented no statistically initial screening and exclusion of duplicates, 207 significant difference in patients treated with or studies were eliminated. After examining the titles without acromioplasty (MD, 1.92; 95%CI, -0.85 to and abstracts, 116 studies were considered to not 4.70; P = 0.17) and no heterogeneity (P = 0.39, I2 meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, we identified 5 = 0%) (Fig 2). Three studies reported the outcomes recently published randomized trials (1,10,17,21,30), of CM score (1,21,30). Pooled analysis revealed that 3 level I and 2 level II, that met the prespecified the CM score of patients treated with subacromial inclusion criteria. A total of 5 randomized trials decompression was higher than those without it in were included in the meta-analysis. favor of performing subacromial decompression Table I presents the patient demographics and (MD, 3.12; 95%CI, -0.05 to 6.29; P = 0.05) (Fig baseline characteristics. Table II summarizes the 3). However, this difference did not reach the characteristics of individual studies and outcomes. significant level (P =0 .05) and was not likely to In total, 465 patients were extracted from the be clinical significance. There was no statistically included studies, of whom 277 (59.6%) were men. significant heterogeneity (P = 0.50, I2 = 0%). Two The mean age across all of the trials ranged from clinical trials (1,30) were reviewed for UCLA score. Fig. 1. — Flow chart shows how articles were selected. RCT, randomized controlled trial Acta Orthopædica Belgica, Vol. 84 - 1 - 2018 Sun.indd 56 8/11/18 12:36 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS ON ACROMIOPLASTY 57 Table I . — Characteristics of included studies Author Setting Mean age Sample size Effective fol- Mean follow- Evidence (years) (% male) low-up (%) up (months) level Gartsman et al. 2004 [10] United States 59.7 93 (55) 100 15.6 I Milano et al. 2007 [21] Italy 60.3 71 (55) 88.8 24 I MacDonald et al. 2011 [17] Canada 56.8 86 (65) 79.1 24 I Shin et al. 2012 [30] South Korea 56.8 120 (56) 80 35 II Abrams et al. 2014 [1] United States 59.2 95 (67) 83.3 24 II Fig. 2. — Forest plot of MD with 95% CI for ASES score The meta-analysis yielded similar result between groups (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.05 to 5.29; P = 0.57) the two groups (MD, 0.70; 95%CI, -0.21 to 1.60; with heterogeneity detected (P = 0.10, I2 = 57%) P=0.13) with no heterogeneity detected (P = 0.33, (Fig 6).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us